मामला न्यायप्रविष्ट होने का कारण बताकर सूचना देने से इनकार नहीं किया जा सकता : नवीन अग्रवाल
प्राथमिक शालाओं के अधिकारियों के लिए सूचना अधिकार पर कार्यशाला
4 दिन में 320 लोगों ने प्रशिक्षण प्राप्त किया
नागपुर। "मांगी गई सूचना से संबंधित मामला न्यायालय में विचाराधीन होने पर मामला न्यायप्रविष्ट होने का कारण बताकर आवेदक को सूचना देने से इनकार नहीं किया जा सकता, क्योंकि सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 की धारा 8 (1) (ख) के अनुसार न्यायालय द्वारा किसी सूचना के प्रकट करने पर यदि स्पष्ट रूप से
प्रकरण न्यायप्रविष्ट असल्याचे कारण देऊन माहिती देण्यास नाकारता येत नाही: नवीन अग्रवाल
प्राथमिक शाळांच्या अधिकाऱ्यांसाठी माहिती अधिकार कार्यशाळेचे आयोजन
4 दिवसात 320 लोकांना प्रशिक्षण
नागपूर. "मागितलेली माहिती संबंधी प्रकरण न्यायप्रविष्ट असल्याचे कारण देऊन अर्जदाराला माहिती देण्यास नाकारता येत नाही, कारण माहितीचा अधिकार अधिनियम, 2005 च्या कलम 8 (1) (ख) नुसार न्यायालयाने जी प्रकाशित करण्यास स्पष्टपणे मनाई केली आहे किंवा जी प्रकट केल्यामुळे न्यायालयाचा अवमान होऊ शकेल फक्त अशी माहिती
आरटीआई में कर्मचारियों की व्यक्तिगत जानकारी प्रदान करना बंधनकारक नहीं : नवीन अग्रवाल
कोटा विश्वविद्यालय, राजस्थान में सूचना का अधिकार विषय पर कार्यशाला आयोजित
नागपुर। सूचना का अधिकार अंतर्गत प्राप्त आवेदन में यदि कर्मचारियों की व्यक्तिगत जानकारी मांगी गई हो तो सूचना का अधिकार कानून की धारा 8 (1) (जे) के तहत ऐसी जानकारी प्रदान करने से मना किया जा सकता हैं। उक्त उदगार दादा रामचंद बाखरू सिंधु महाविद्यालय, नागपुर के रजिस्ट्रार एवं जाने-माने सूचना अधिकार प्रशिक्षक श्री नवीन महेशकुमार अग्रव
Nagpur. 28th September is observed as International Right to Information Day across the world. Mr. Naveen Maheshkumar Agrawal, Registrar, Dada Ramchand Bakhru Sindhu Mahavidyalaya, with a view to creating awareness about the Right to Information Act, 2005 in society sent the soft copies of the RTI Act to 1000 people on International Right to Information Day. It was indeed a novel way on his part to spread awareness about the Act. The copies of the Act were sent in English, Hindi and Marathi lang
Information under RTI cannot be Refused even if the matter is sub judice : Naveen Agrawal
Workshop on RTI organised for officers of primary schools
320 people trained in 4 days
Nagpur. "Information sought under the RTI act 2005 cannot be denied on the pretext of the matter concerned being sub judice as per the provision of the act under section 8 (1) (b)" observed Mr. Naveen Maheshkumar Agrawal, recognised trainer of YASHADA , Pune and Registrar, Dada Ramchand Bakhru Sind
a very important topic that needs to be discussed more actively in modern society. I am always for the security of relationships, always for them to be as comfortable as possible for the two parties, to cause only positive emotions. Now I spend time on sites like Adultfriendfinder https://hookupmasters.com/adult-dating-sites/adultfriendfinder-review/. Adult Friend Finder is one of the commonly known sites where you can get fast sexual encounters and many hookups. It is a platform where you can g
Sir, existance of cooperative society on the govt will be very important in deciding cases of numerous such mushrooming socieites by political leaders getting works exclusively from the govt without any tendering at double the prevailing rates.
In my humble opinion, this judgment can be useful in such mushrooming socieites.
As per Revision petition of full bench of NSCRDC "RTI Applicant is not a consumer" and SC has refused to entertain RP. There is no scope for considering RTI Applicant as consumer as the NSCRDC decision is final. No Consumer forum entertains any such complaint from RTI Applicant.
LUCKNOW: The Central government has provided categorized security cover to 308 persons, out of which 24 have been provided the highest Z-plus cover, according to the answer to an RTI query.
As per information provided by S.C.L. Das, Joint Secretary in the Union Home Ministry to city-based activist Nutan Thakur, two dozen persons have been given Z-plus security, 59 persons have been given Z security, 109 have been given Y-plus, 34 have been given Y and 82 persons have been given X category security.
New Delhi: Delhi High Court has ruled that vehicles of India’s top constitutional authorities like the President, the Vice President, Governors and Lieutenant Governors will have to be registered with the authority. According to the ruling, all vehicles need to clearly display the registration numbers. A petition, filed by an NGO Nyayabhoomi, claimed that the practice of displaying the state emblem, instead of the registration numbers, make the dignitaries become easy targets for terrorists and anyone with malicious intent.
In December last year, the Delhi High Court had asked the Centre and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government in the national capital to place before it the rules regarding display of just the State Emblem of India on the cars of the constitutional authorities and dignitaries, such as the President, instead of their registration numbers, PTI had reported.
The petitioner also sought direction to the Delhi government and Delhi Police to seize the cars used by the Rashtrapati Bhawan, Vice President, Raj Niwas and Protocol division of the Ministry of External Affairs for not being registered under the Motor Vehicles Act, PTI reported.
After the petition was filed, a bench of acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar had directed both the governments to check the position and inform it about the same.
The plea was based on an RTI response by the Ministry of External Affairs which stated that none of its 14 cars maintained were registered.
Last year, the Rashtrapati Bhawan had refused to provide the registration numbers of all the presidential vehicles on the ground that disclosure of such information would endanger the security of the state and life of the President.
In our area, Corporation started laying new roads for sub-streets.They uprooted all the ballast in the sub street to prepare the street for laying new road.After heaping the ballast, they stopped the work midway causing life miserable for residents. A child playing on the street got her head broken on the ballast and got treated in a Private hospital.MLC registered.We are unable to take our vehicles out.Raised a complaint with Corporation and they did not take action till date ( more than 2 months elapsed since the date of complaint ).I would like a draft a complaint with proper exhibits.I need MLC information from police such as doctor MLC report.wound certificate etc to prove the mishap due to negligent conduct of the contractor,engineer and supervisor of corporation.Also need information on the contractor who left the work midway and the AE incharge of the ward.Also, in the main street,they re-laid the road with tar and within 2 months, a huge hole has come up.We have temporarliy closed it with boxes to prevent accidents.