Jump to content

Raveena O Blog

  • entries
    22
  • comments
    28
  • views
    1,277

What after decision by central or state information commissioner


RAVEENA_O

1,401 views

WHAT AFTER DECISION BY CENTRAL/STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER

There are large number of instances, where the State Information Commissioners are passing orders contrary to the spirit and object of RTI Act and contradicting the laid down procedures. Another issue is the Public Authorities did not comply the decisions of CIC/SIC and the Information Commissions are not strict about enforcing penal provisions under section-20. The Information Seekers feel they were pushed to dead end. There is a common feeling that no appeal lies against decision of State Information Commissioner. Let us examine it.

 There is also a general notion that Courts have no jurisdiction to entertain challenges arising out of RTI Act. This is not correct. The bar provided under Sec.23 of the Act is specific to entertaining suit, application or other proceedings by lower courts. There is no bar in approaching Supreme Court under Article-32 and High Courts under Article-226 of the Constitution of India.

 Another aspect is the jurisdiction of individual Information Commissioners to pass binding orders. Sec-19(7) of the Act states that decision of Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall be binding. This does not mean that decision is not appelable. The wording of Sec-19(7) denote the decision of the Commission and not the Commissioner. The Commission consists of the Chief Information Commissioner and Central Information Commissioners or State Chief Information Commissioner and State Information Commissioners. The decision of the Central Information Commissioner or State Information Commissioner, as the case may be, cannot be said to be the decision of the Central Information Commission or State Information Commission. The constitution of the Central Information Commission and State Information Commission are defined u/s 12(2) and 15(2) respectively.

 Section-19(9) provides that Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be, shall give notice of its decision, including any right of appeal, to the complainant and public authority. Thus, the legislative intent is amply clear that a right to appeal accrue in favour of Applicant and Public Authority against the decision of Central Information Commissioner / State Information Commissioner. It is pertinent to note that under section-15(4), the general superintendence, direction and management of the affairs of the SIC shall vest in the State Chief Information Commissioner.....etc.

 In this view this, if the order of the Central Information Commissioner / State Information Commissioner is patently illegal and not in conformity with the provisions of the Act, an appeal can be filed before the Central Information Commissioner / State Chief Information Commissioner for consideration and adjudication by the Central Information Commission / State Information Commission.

 Section-19(8)(b) provides that the CIC or SIC has powers to require the public authority to compensate the complainant for any loss or other detriment suffered. Consumer courts can also be moved to seek compensation.

 In addition, the Appellant can also file Complaint under Section-18 before the Commission with specific prayers. Delhi High Court vide decision dt: 28/10/13, distinguished Sec-18 and 19(3) and held that - it is expected that the Commission (CIC) henceforth will decide the complaints on merits instead of directing the CPIO to provide the information which the complainant had sought (see copy of judgment attached below)

After disposal of Appeal u/s 19(3) and/or Complaint under sec-18(1) of the Act, the applicant can challenge the orders of the Information Commission by filing writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Also read: Appeal -vs- Complaint

2 Comments


Recommended Comments

garg0505

Posted

Sir, as mentioned in your blog about High Court decision dated 28.10.13, the copy of judgement not available. I shall me highly obliged if you post the copy of the order.

Thanks and regards.

Link to comment
garg0505

Posted

On 8/2/2020 at 4:35 PM, garg0505 said:

Sir, as mentioned in your blog about High Court decision dated 28.10.13, the copy of judgement not available. I shall me highly obliged if you post the copy of the order.

Thanks and regards.

Inspired by your article, I am submitting you a brief, and documents for your kind perusal and opinion to file 
the writ petition in Delhi High Court for the inaction of the information commissioner, central information commissioner under RTI Act. Hopefully after having study you shall revert back to me with your opinion.
The relevant Point for consideration to challenge the orders of the Sh. Y.K. Sinha, Information Commissioner, Central Information Commission by filling the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The following 8 N0s of complaint/ Appeals were filed, before the Central Information Commission, New Delhi under section 18 (1) /19(3) of the RTI Act,2005.

1.      CIC/NDMCC/C/2018/106150       PIO Jt. Director (Civil)

2.      CIC/NDMCN/A/2018/110090       PIO Sr. Account Officer

3.      CIC/NDMCN/A/2018/130124       PIO Sr. Account Officer

4.      CIC/NDMCN/C/2018/132921       PIO Sr. Account Officer

5.      CIC/NDMCN/C/2019/109082       PIO Sr. Account Officer

6.      CIC/NDMCN/A/2019/110493       PIO Jt. Director (Civil)

7.      CIC/NDMCN/A/2019/110770       PIO Jt. Director (Civil)

8.      CIC/NDMCN/A/2019/114103       PIO Jt. Director (Civil)

The simultaneous hearing for above mentioned Appeals/Complaint, was held on 23.09.2019 wherein along with Appellant/Complainant, Sh. Pankaj Sharma Jt. Director (Civil) and Sh. R.K. Mamgain, Account Officer as PIOs have represented as PIOs of Public Authority.

The Complainant/Appellant have submitted his written statement before the Information Commissioner prior to hearing i.e. on 03.09.2019 with a copy to PIO and FAA pertaining to complaint/Appeal mentioned at sl. no. 1, 6,7, and 8, on 03.09.2019 for sl.no. 5, and on 09.09.2019 for at sl. no. 2,3, and 4.

Further on 17.09.2019 Cue based on cogent reasons and compiled with procedure from reply furnished by PIOs of Civil Estt. And the Finance Department of Public Authority submitted  for deciding the Appeal/Complaint as per provision of section 18,19 20 and 25 (5) of RTI Act 2005.

Since the Order dated 24.09.2019 (Copy Attached) by the Information Commissioner, Central Information Commission, New Delhi, are contrary to the spirit and object of RTI Act and contradicting the laid down procedures. As the another issue is the PIOs did not comply the decisions of the Information Commissioner, in true spirit of the order and status report filed by me. Information commissioner has not strictly enforced penal provisions under Section 20 of the RTI Act in spite the status report submitted by Appellant/Complainant on 30.12.2019 (Copy Attached) as such information seeker have been pushed to dead end by not implementing own decision dated 24.09.2019 in above mentioned Appeals/Complaint.

cic_decision_24_09.pdf Status Report to CIC.pdf

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy