All Activity
This stream auto-updates
- Last week
-
Give a polite reminder stating that IC has directed PiO to provide information within a week, but there is no trace of response from PIO, and make a gentle reminder to provide the information as expeditiously possible and mark this as copy to SIC . It is more than enough. If he is local just request them over phone without writing a letter.
-
Sir during Second Appeal at SIC on 06.01.20 the IC ordered information to be provided within a week. But still now I havent received the information and a copy of the order. The order is also not yet uploaded on TNSIC website. So should I wait till I receive the order physically or can I go ahead with Non Complaince.
-
Think practicably. In India, it is power, party and influence that can get things done and inadequate funds is the main issue. Under RTI you can get only that information which is available on record in material form under custody of the public authority. As per my understanding, authorities might have taken a decision to prefer those colonies where the population is more. There may be exceptions also, and when some one wants to reject a thing, they will find out the loopholes first as excuse/reason. You can file two separate RTI Applications...one only for knowing the policy guidelines Please provide me the laid down norms for selecting layouts for providing Roads and drainage. For the second you can use template that is ready in our forum as sample application RTI wiki. https://www.righttoinformation.wiki/guide/applicant/application/sample/gram-panchayat Make suitable alterations
-
Unless members read the PIO response, it is not possible to guide. You have to submit the appeal within 30 days of completing inspection, as early as possible. It is surprising as to how it is possible that you can not get any information in such an important task. There is something wrong somewhere. Please submit first appeal as expeditiously as possible and state Grounds for appeal clearly. If PIO provided information query wise, then prepare a three column table and explain the reasons as to why you are not satisfied with reply. _______________________________________________________________________________________ Information solicited............................Provided by PIO.......................................Reasons for first appeal. ______1____________________________2_________________________________3_______________ 1 2 3 4 to10 ___ Pray for personal hearing, and take permission for taking assistance during First appeal hearing in the appeal itself.
-
After visiting the office I could get no information after file inspection nor I have received any information from 18/01/2020. Can I proceed with my 1st appeal and what can be the last date of filing 1st appeal ( Extremely thankful for giving prompt replies)
-
Sir, Our area is located under the control of Panchayat Union.The officer incharge is Block Development Officer and District level officer is DRDA. No roads laid for over 10 yrs, We lodged representations with DC and higher ups. Today BDO called me and said out of 75 plots in our layout , there are 25 unsold plots and we cannot lay roads in such a state with 25 unsold plots.They have laid roads in layouts with only one house constructed, Again I called DRDA and he said check with your revenue dept whether your layout is approved or not. In this regard, i would like to seek information on orders stating that roads cannot be laid in an layout with 25 empty plots, list of road works carried out in the panchayat etc. Kindly advice
-
RTI Section 11 & 8(1)(d) - sub-judice matter
Prasad GLN replied to manjun_papanna's question in Ask for RTI Support
By the time your written addendum reaches, IC might have despatched his orders. During oral submissions IC might have already decided and he reduces the same in writing within few minutes. (I apprehend that IC may give one line decision and rest is done by Registry, and here local PIOs keep registry in good moods and get decision in their favour) Try to send the same by Fax . Any submission made to IC by one party, he should necessarily make a copy to the other party. It is clearly written in your Hearing notice and that notice also states that written submissions much reach them 7 days before hearing. Just wait for the decision of IC. -
RTI Section 11 & 8(1)(d) - sub-judice matter
manjun_papanna replied to manjun_papanna's question in Ask for RTI Support
Thanks sir. With this I made a submission citing sub-judis previous decision. Now the order is reserved. Since the order is reserved, can i submit addendum with additional points at this time based on the reply/statement filed by respondent with the commission. ?Infact I wanted to put-forth my response during the VC but due to time shortage it could not be done. If addendum can be submitted, is it required to submit a copy to respondent as well ? THX. -
- koteswararaonerella
- nreddyy
FAA noformat is prescribed and you have to appeal as below
To
...................... FAA, Address (FAA will be generally higher officer of PIO and mostly in the same office building)
Sir,
sub: Submission of FIRST APPEAL under sec 19 of RTI Act 2005.
22222222
I have submitted RTI Application to PIO.....................on - - and PIO has not furnished reply/furnished reply is NOT COMPLETE and therefore this APPEAL.Kindly arrange to provide the desired information as per RTI ACt.I am herewioth enclosing my RTI application and replyof PIO (copes) for ready reference
yours sincerely
-
akshay6900
@Galibe_vishal @CPHydCity @cpcybd @VijayGopal_ @CoreenaSuares2 @TSConsumers @dheeshmap @NGOKYR @HiHyderabad Asian M… https://t.co/owwJwyUssK
-
akshay6900
@CEC_EVDM Sir, hope this illegal hoarding is removed as there is no permission given by the department. #WakeupEVDM https://t.co/89M6O9Es3G
-
Dear RTI Gurus: I filed an RTI query with SEBI, using an e-IPO to make payment of INR 11 towards application fees. Just noticed that I received text notification on my cell phone: "Dear Customer, your Account XXxxx has been credited with INR 11.00 on 22-Jan-20. Info: VPS REF www indiapost gov in." This has to be the RTI application fees I paid. In 15 years of making RTI applications, many to SEBI, I have never had this happen. And I don't know what to make of this. I do realize that in Sept 2018 I made the exact same query to SEBI, and never received an answer. I don't know if now SEBI has suddenly discovered that old query and RTI application fees payment, and is therefore returning this INR 11. This would be a kind interpretation, but inconsistent with SEBI's usual attitude. On the other hand I wonder if this is a novel way of rejecting a query. The query itself is very simple, asking SEBI to update the data it solemnly promised to provide in response to a Rajya Sabha question by Shyam Benegal, intended to provide stale historical-archival FII transaction data that is available from https://www.sebi.gov.in/statistics/fpi-investment/trade-wise-equity-data-of-fpi.html. This data is used by academics for research purposes. SEBI was supposed to allow a lag of no more than 3 months. That was never honoured but it did occasionally update allowing a lag of no more than a year. But since July 2017 there has been no update at all, So now the lag is more than 30 months. FYI, over the past few years, depending strictly on the luck of the draw (I don't know of any systematic reason) sometimes SEBI has updated on its own. Sometimes it has updated upon receiving an RTI query. Sometimes it has just ignored the whole query, and the SEBI First Appeal has proved to be only an obscene joke. My second appeals are languishing for years at CIC. Please help. What should I do? The 30-day period is not yet over (runs till 5th Feb 2020). Attaching a copy of my RTI query. Best, Murgie Krishnan for_RTIInfdia.org to_SEBI_RTI_Query_re_FPI_data_6th_Jan_2020.pdf
-
RTI Section 11 & 8(1)(d) - sub-judice matter
Prasad GLN replied to manjun_papanna's question in Ask for RTI Support
When PIOs do not want to part with information, without application of mind, they will select all 8 (1) clauses one by one to deny information. Mere quoting of section and denying information is not lawful denial. They have to justify as to how such exemption clause applies to this specific information now being provided in the query.. Unless you provide the exact query, it is not possible to guide you on 8 (1) (d) you have to inform name of public authority also. Application of 11 as exemption is unknown. It is only formal letter written to third party seeking objections if any as courtesy and that is not binding on PIO and when larger public interest is involved there are never any exemptions. It is not clear as to whether they have referred your application to third party and also informed you of his objections if any. Subjudice is never a reason for denial. TO use such exemption, the court should order for not disclosing that information specifically and then only it can be rejected. I could find these smart tricks only of one Public sector oil company notorious in their RTI implementation Appellant should always stress larger public interest and transparency and acccountability, and PIO can not claim any exemption. -
RTI Section 11 & 8(1)(d) - sub-judice matter
manjun_papanna posted a question in Ask for RTI Support
Sir, Requesting suggestions in this regard. I have 2nd appeal hearing this week RTI application came to be denied for all points under section 8(1)(d) and 7(9) by CPIO. FAA up-held CPIO decision and also invoked additional Section 11 to deny the information under the response from 3rd party. Reason for invoking section 11 (no sub-section mentioned) is that pending court case. My contention is that, public interest outweighs personal interest / commercial confidence / trade secrete, and involved in this public project ~200Cr rupees public money and seeking the information so that I could seek appropriated agency investigation. CPIO/FAA arguments is that applicant is also involved in the project thru 3rd party and exited the project abruptly and litigation on-going. While checking web-site, I could find few decisions about sub-judice can not be the reason to deny information. However, in this case it involves litigation/court case b/w applicant and 3rd party which came to be filed only after filing RTI application. Appreciate any suggestion/help with earlier decisions. Thanks. -
akshay6900
RT @DCPEASTZONE: Nice rao song on #ObeyTrafficRules by school children . #RoadSafety @HYDTP @AddlCPTrHyd @tkp1080 @vinay_vangala @HydForum…
-
There should be some purpose as to how one can arrive at a logical conclusion to an issue and how to make the information useful in general. I am sorry seeking 10 years information and for such vast information may not appear proper for normal citizen. Coming to first appeal the simple grounds for appeal may be information provided by CPIO is not complete, relevant, correct and not satisfactory. The prayer is for providing complete correct and relevant information for all points. Unless you come out exactly wit the issue, the queries always appear to be an harassment of CPIO and even CIC may pass strictures against appellant.
-
1. Kindly provide the total number of Ex-servicemen security guards are working at IOCL. from all the units of Port Blair from last 10 years in year wise with names and present posting. Ans: Security guards are engaged by the contractor, hence data is not avl from last 10 years and given present year posted security guards. 2. Kindly provide the payment of each Ex-servicemen security guard in a month working at all the units of IOCL. Port Blair. Ans: the information sought under personal information under ec. 8(1)(j) of RTI act disclosure is would not satisfy any larger public interest 3. Kindly mention any register was maintaining by IOCL, Port Blair of all units for these Ex-servicemen Security Guards, if yes provide the Xerox copies from last 10 years. Ans: No such records are available. 4. Kindly provide the total number of Ex-servicemen agency suppliers participated in the tender process from last 10 years in year wise, mention the name of the firms. Ans: presently data is not available 5. Kindly provide the tender process of these ex-servicemen security guards. Ans; limited tender with single bid.
-
-
The Sec.2 (f) definition for information includes "data material held in any electronic form' and as such CITIZEN is entitled to get that form through CD from the custodian, if that information is stored, preserved and under custody of that authority.
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
Since today all public authorities are under CC TV surveillance, Can I get a footage of some recordings under the RTI Act
-
Advice given to President on Mercy Petition by Home Ministry is not Ministerial Advice- CIC
Andrii93 commented on momita's entry in News
great -
Andrii93
I’ll quickly tell you my friend’s secret how he found a good job! everything is simple! he turned to professionals who wrote him a good resume! here is their site resume writing service
-
akshay6900
RT @Collector_MDL: Appeal to all citizens especially voters of 13 Urban Local Bodies in Medchal dist : Pls spare an hour of your time on 22…
- Earlier
-
akshay6900
RT @DrTamilisaiGuv: Participated in pulse polio program for Rajbhavan families today at #Hyderabad @rashtrapatibhvn @PMOIndia @MoHFW_INDIA…
-
akshay6900
@prdthailand Thailand's Hon'ble Deputy PM today visited Charminar at city of pearls. #IndiaThailand🤝 #Hyderabad… https://t.co/xto6ACG9oT
