Jump to content
  • 0

RTI Against High Court Clerk Recuitment




I have given the High Court Recruitment Clerk Exam, Pre & Mains have been cleared by me, but they have failed me in the Typing Test, which i can believe and unfortunate. My Query is that, if PIO refused to give me my type test copy, what should be my next step for the same. Whom should i approach as i have to file the case against the High Court Officials.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You have to file First Appeal to the FAA within time limit of 30 days under RTI Act.



Sent from RTI INDIA Mobile App

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Dear Sir,

Please tell me, the result is out by Punjab & Haryana High Court, Can we challenge the result of High Court or the High Courts have the Immunity from RTI Act.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

If PIO refused you the information you sought, then file a first appeal.

If not satisfied with the order of the first appellate authority, you can file a second appeal.


Challenging the result in the High Court is a entirely different matter - nothing to do with RTI.


RTI will only help you in getting documents and records - which you can then use in the case in the High Court.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

What is the reason given by PIO. He should give one of the reasons mentioned in section 8.1 with justification for that reason. You may also refer Courts RTI Rules and Fees - Guide for filing first appeal. You have 30 days time to file first appeal from the date of receipt of PIO decision by you.


Following links will also be useful to you for future:


Bank recruitment:





Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • crusader
      By crusader
      I want to know that I have got information from Nagar nigam, Can I use it as an evidence in the court of law? What are the provisions related to that?
    • Shrawan
      By Shrawan
      Central Information Commission


      Decision No.292/IC(A)/2006
      F. No.CIC/MA/A/2006/00588


      Dated, the 21st September, 2006


      Name of the Appellant : Sh. Sharabh Dubey, 11/7 Civil Lines, Kanpur –208 001. (U.P.)
      Name of the Public Authority: The British India Corporation Limited, 14/136 Civil Lines, P.B. 77, Kanpur-208 001.
      Facts of the Case:

      The appellant is an employee of the respondent. He was transferred to another Unit of the company. The office order was challenged by him in the Court, which adjudicated on the matter. Subsequently, he has filed a few more petitions on service related matters in the Court. In this backdrop, he has sought documents relating to the legal opinion obtained by the respondent, file notings by the senior officials on the issue of transfer, letters/correspondence with other officials, etc.
      The CPIO has denied the information and sought exemption u/s 8(1)(d) & (g) of the Act.
      The case was heard on 12.9.06. The appellant could not be present. The CPIO and the appellate authority were present. In the course of hearing, the CPIO showed a copy of the petition filed by the appellant in the Court, whic hcontained almost all the documents asked for by him. The CPIO contended that the documents asked for by the appellant relate to the various petitions filed by him in the Court. He, therefore, pleaded that the disclosure of the documents might adversely affect the disputed cases. Hence, the relevant documents are treated as confidential.
      Commission’s Decision:

      There is a dispute between the appellant and the company on service matters, including transfer of the appellant to another unit. The matter is pending before the Court for adjudication. There is every possibility that the appellant would get opportunity for his effective defense. The information sought is in the interest of the seeker. And, as such, there is no overriding public interest, u/s 8(1)(j) of the Act, for disclosure of the information.
      The appeal is therefore dismissed.

      (Prof. M.M. Ansari)
      Information Commissioner


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy