Jump to content

CIC: Info regarding pension is a "life or liberty" matter

Recommended Posts


CIC has ruled that information regarding pension of the applicant is a matter related to "life or liberty" and should be responded to within 48 hours.







When a woman below poverty line was surviving on pension from social welfare department,

nonpayment of pension would cause a serious problem of living, the RTI request about nonpayment

of pension is information about ’life and liberty’ of appellant and the respondent

authority should have responded to within 48 hours. The stand taken by the respondent

authority that the pension is stopped as there was no bank account is unreasonable and not

acceptable. Going by reasonability, common sense and legal duty, the respondent authority

would have continued paying pension to the appellant through the Post Office Account, till

she got the account opened in the bank. CIC ordered payment of dues of pension Rs 43,500

with simple interest from due date to date of restoration and Rs 5000 as compensation. The

public authority has to put in place a mechanism of not stopping the pension till the

communication is reached the pensioners and respond to their general enquiries and RTI

question very promptly without any delay, maximum in 48 hours from the date of receipt of


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

Again the decision is from same IC SA, who is more liberal to social problems and the decision is the best decision by any IC so far, as it directly touches common man.

(Particularly when six persons lost their lives while filing applications for such pensions before Post offices during this Dec,14. One can see people aged at 80 and physically disabled waiting in queue right from 6 am for their turn to open savings bank account post offices without providing any extra staff for additional load. They are simply starving and there is not even drinking water facility for them. No need to mention that several post offices stopped usual transactions meant for PO)


But the pity is that Pensions are State Govt., schemes, and most honorable state information commissioners openly defy such well considered decisions and say that they are not binding on State Commissions. Neither they work creatively and public friendly nor implement other's good decisions. May be SA may become competitive to Ex Hon IC SG, but another sorry affair is IC SA is restricted to Delhi only. May be there are chances for him to become CIC one day.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • humhongeykamyaab
      By humhongeykamyaab
      Need some clarity on how to draft the RTI for the information asked; Alternatively, please advice what other course of action to pursue?
      Case of Illegal Recovery of Pension by Public Sector Bank  (thereafter referred as PSB)
      1) The PSB, the pension disbursal bank mistakenly overpaid the pension to the pensioner for 10 years;
      2) No connivance or misrepresentation from the Pensioner; solely a mistake done by the Bank. 
      The over payment was detected via a CAG Audit, and the mistake of the bank as well was pointed out in the same audit
      3)Now the PSB has started recovering the Pension since last 3 years, illegally.
      4)No recovery order or show cause notice has been ever issued to the Pensioner by the bank or any competent authority
      5)This recovery is illegal as per Apex Court judgement on Rafiq Masih's Case- 
      which states that no recovery can be done after 5 years of continual overpayment
      6) The Pensioner has been forced to go to the court to seek redressal. Case is stuck in the court for the last 3 years
      An RTI Was filed in May 2018/ Information sought and response received are as under:-
      Q-2) Provide the list of all officials and their designation who dealt with this pension matter during Dec 2006 to Dec 2007 at CPPC and PSB Branch
      Q-3) Name the officer who responsible for sanctioning the excess pension
      Q-5) Please provide number of cases in your bank wherein excess amount of pension is being recovered
      Response received (for all three questions, above) from CPIO: As informed by the Branch Manager of your branch : Information is not available
      Q-4) Name the officer who is recovering my excess pension
      Response received : The excess pension has been detected by the Performance Audit Team  under CAG and adviced via audit memo 36 dated XX 
                           to recover the amount of 10 Lakhs which is over paid since  1. 1. 2007. As such bank is recovering now and refunding the authority.
      My Comment on Q-4:
      It doesn't give the name of the officer who is recovering excess. Plus: The Audit Memo from CAG does not talk about recovery at- all. This has also
      been mentioned in the affidavit by the pension sanctioning authority in the court where it states that CAG has not issued any order of recovery. So this response is misleading.
      Unfortunately I was not able to file the First Appeal to the above response.
      Should I file another RTI ? Is re-drafting of the questions needed? The bank is hell bent on shielding its errant officials and protecting them.  Please feel free to advise me on any other course of action as deemed fit. 
      Thank You,
    • Shrawan
      By Shrawan
      NEW DELHI: The beaming face of Laxmi Devi says it all. The 80-year-old has finally got her pension after she'd almost given up hope, thanks to the Right To Information Act.
      Laxmi Devi lives with her daughter, who works as a domestic help, in Khirki village. In May 2005, she applied for an old-age pension to MCD. But despite numerous visits to the office, there was no sign of a pension.
      Finally, she approached an RTI camp organised by Satark Nagarik Sanghathan, an NGO. She was told her application was missing and she would have to apply again. She did. And promptly got approval for a monthly pension of Rs 350 in December. She will receive a cheque of Rs 1,750 (for five months) this month.
      Laxmi Devi is not alone. Ordinary people are now using RTI to get basic amenities, install road signage, repair roads and even get admission in schools.
      Sangeeta and Sultana of Begumpur didn't get their ration entitlements for over two years as their ration cards weren't being renewed by the Food and Civil Supplies Department. Though touts offered to help them for a ‘fee', they decided to take the RTI route. By November 2006, both had got their ration cards.
      Source: Citizen uses RTI to get elusive pension -India-NEWS-The Times of India


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy