Jump to content
News Ticker
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
  • 0
sb.vaidya

Is circular of DoPT No 1/6/2011-IR dt 15-4-2013 applicable to Nationalised banks?

Question

sb.vaidya

Hello, A Nationalised bank CPIO has taken stand that DoPT No 1/6/2011-IR dt 15-4-2013 is not applicable since it is only marked to Ministrues /department of Govt of India and not to Banks.. If any body can give me decisions of CIC/High courts in this regard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
MANOJ B. PATEL

Welcome to RTI INDIA PORTAL. Thank you for choosing RTI INDIA PORTAL.

 

Please click the following link and read through the topics:

 

RTI Information

 

Please do not post in to multiple forums or start multiple threads. You need to study links on home page of this website and then start drafting RTI for common problem of specific issues etc. You can post draft RTI application on this portal so that our members can refine it. Thus you will be having working knowledge of RTI over a period of time. Please also visit this website often and peruse queries and replies by our members, which will make you comfortable with RTI.

 

Dear Member, in addition,

 

To explore about RTI kindly refer following links

 

(A) Download RTI Forms

(B) How to Become RTI Activist

© How to file RTI Online

(D) Centre / State RTI Rules and Fees

(E) Case laws of RTI

 

Regard & Best Wishes.

Manoj B.Patel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Prasad GLN

Unless you quote the contents, members are not interested in your issue to search and find out the website and then guide you on that specific issue.

Banks are being guided by Awards and settlements at apex level between IBA and other employee's Association. Please post your specific query so that the comparison can be made as to whether banks have individual such stipulation in awards/settlements/internal agreements which may be not in consonance with DOPT circulars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
loyolaganesh

The order related to Suo Moto disclosures has CC to "All Departments of GOI". Department of Financial Services is one such department under the GOI which is administering Government policies having a bearing on the working of banks. Allahabad Bank, Indian Bank have already uploaded their Suo Moto disclosures in their site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
RAVEENA_O

DoPT No 1/6/2011-IR dt 15-4-2013

Section-4 of RTI Act is mandatory and applicable to all Public Authorities. DoPT circular in question is further guidelines and clarification.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
koteswararaonerella

The CPIO of the bank is right and unless the Finace Minstry endorse the copy to RBI and whom in turn mark the same to all the CEOs the local branches may not be able to act on such circulars without knowing what is inside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Sunil Ahya

As said by Raveenaji, the Office Memorandum of DoPT very much applies to the said Bank.

 

If you have filed a RTI Application, then you can file a first appeal under section 19(1) with the concerned First Appellate Authority and take your RTI forward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • Shrawan
      By Shrawan
      Central Information Commission



      Decision No. 297/IC(A)/2006
      F. No. CIC/MA/A/2006/00663
      Dated, the 21st September, 2006



      Name of the Appellant : Shri S. Gangaiah Nayakar, 3/488, Rajapalayam Salai, T. N.C.Alangulam, District - Virudhunagar-626127
      Name of the Public Authority: Indian Overseas Bank, Customers Service Department, Central office, 763,Anna Salai, Channai-600 002. DECISION
       
      The appellant had sought certain information, which was largely furnished to him.
      The CPIO however denied the information relating to the details of loan accounts of another person and other documents submitted by him. The CPIO contented that the information sought is related to personal information, which is exempted u/s 8(1)(j) of the Act. The appellate authority upheld the decision of the CPIO.
      There is no denial of information to the appellant. The Banks are expected to maintain confidentiality of the accounts of its customers and that the documents submitted by its customers do not fall under public domain. Hence, exempted u/s 8(1)(j) of the Act.
      The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
      Sd/-
      (Prof M. M. Ansari)
      Information Commissioner
      Download the decision from Download Segment



    • armyguy
      By armyguy
      This RTI is a powerful tool to expose major policy decisions. Recently a major breakthrough happened with effort in Delhi to privatize water supply in the city.
       
      Apparently, this was a proposed World Bank funded effort. The proposal was on since the mid nineties in complete secrecy. However, some news leaked out in to the press, and an RTI petition was filed asking for the files on this process.
       
      At first there was a lot of resistance, but finally the files were made public, and the story was shocking. Apparently, the World Bank was arm twisting and almost dictating policy to the government. The process of privatization (or any government work) takes place with bids by bidding companies. There is a two layered process, where first in this case the top six companies would be selected, and then in the second round, the best among them would be selected. Here, in the first round, Pricewaterhouse-Coopers, the well known consulting firm, had a bid that came in tenth. By law, they should have been eliminated. But the world bank insisted that PWC be considered. At first the government protested, but with continuous pressure relented, and declared PWC to be selected in the top six by declaring it to be an Indian company! In the next round, again PWC fared badly, with only a 67% score, and a terrible proposal. Again the world bank pressurized the government (by asking it to remove the people who evaluated the proposal), and forced the government to declare the PWC bid as the winner. Again, the government capitulated to pressure.
       
      It wasn’t just this, but the entire process of water privatization in this proposal was rather absurd, and would have affected millions of people adversely.
       
      Bowing to public pressure (after the dealings were revealed due to the RTI petition), the government scrapped the project completely.

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy