Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
  • 0
R Suresh

Non-delivery of urgent parcel by Speedpost

Question

R Suresh

Hello,

 

I booked an order from Ebay.com. They dispatched my order through Speedpost on 27/12/2014. But today, its 14/01/2015, but I have not received it yet. The Speedpost No is EM620401401IN. When I try to track it, it shows status of 30/12/2014 as below--

27/12/2014 09:53:00 Vasai Road E S.O Item Booked

27/12/2014 14:39:21 Vasai Road E S.O Item bagged for NSH MUMBAI

27/12/2014 14:59:18 Vasai Road E S.O Bag Despatched to NSH MUMBAI

27/12/2014 18:08:37 NSH MUMBAI Bag Received

27/12/2014 19:26:04 NSH MUMBAI Bag Opened

27/12/2014 19:26:07 NSH MUMBAI Item Received

27/12/2014 19:57:29 NSH MUMBAI Item bagged for NSH NEW DELHI

27/12/2014 23:30:10 NSH MUMBAI Bag Despatched to NSH NEW DELHI

28/12/2014 18:41:34 PALAM TMO Bag Received

28/12/2014 23:20:24 PALAM TMO Bag Despatched to NSH NEW DELHI

29/12/2014 00:24:54 NSH NEW DELHI Bag Received

29/12/2014 13:49:00 NSH NEW DELHI Item Received

29/12/2014 16:34:39 NSH NEW DELHI Item bagged for Greater Kailash S.O

30/12/2014 05:52:13 NSH NEW DELHI Bag Despatched to GREATER KAILASH PART II

30/12/2014 11:12:42 Greater Kailash S.O Bag Received

30/12/2014 11:14:00 Greater Kailash S.O Delivery Attempted: Missent

30/12/2014 11:14:03 Greater Kailash S.O Bag Opened

30/12/2014 11:14:03 Greater Kailash S.O Item Received

30/12/2014 11:23:00 Greater Kailash S.O Item bagged for NSH NEW DELHI

30/12/2014 16:11:07 NSH NEW DELHI Bag Received

30/12/2014 16:11:09 NSH NEW DELHI Bag Received

30/12/2014 16:11:20 NSH NEW DELHI Bag Received

30/12/2014 16:11:30 NSH NEW DELHI Bag Received

 

 

Under this circumstances, I want RTI help to get the order delivered to my address as soon as possible as its very very urgent.

 

R. SURESH

NEW DELHI - 110048

MOBILE NO. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
MANOJ B. PATEL

Welcome to RTI INDIA PORTAL. Thank you for choosing RTI INDIA PORTAL.

 

Please click the following link and read through the topics:

 

RTI Information

 

Please do not post in to multiple forums or start multiple threads. You need to study links on home page of this website and then start drafting RTI for common problem of specific issues etc. You can post draft RTI application on this portal so that our members can refine it. Thus you will be having working knowledge of RTI over a period of time. Please also visit this website often and peruse queries and replies by our members, which will make you comfortable with RTI.

 

Dear Member, in addition,

 

To explore about RTI kindly refer following links

 

(A) Download RTI Forms

(B) How to Become RTI Activist

© How to file RTI Online

(D) Centre / State RTI Rules and Fees

(E) Case laws of RTI

 

Regard & Best Wishes.

Manoj B.Patel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Prasad GLN

Please immediately lodge complaint on line and also PGRMS portal and contact your nearest post office to trace the parcel, as it was reported having been received at NSH, New Delhi.

First try to to contact over phone.

Also make a complaint to sender about non receipt.

 

RTI can not be of immediate help to you.

 

Delete your mobile no. as it is against discipline of the forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • venugopal
      By venugopal
      I had asked for the information from the superintendent of Post Office about details of my registered letter which I had booked 3 years before, but he has refused to give the information saying that he cannot give that information.
       
      He has not written why he cannot give that information. Should I go for appeal?
    • Shrawan
      By Shrawan
      CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
      BLOCK IV, OLD JNU CAMPUS, NEW DELHI 110067


       

      F.No.PBA/06/149
      22nd September, 2006


       
       

      Appeal No.112 /ICPB/2006


      In the matter of Right to Information Act, 2005 – Section 19.
       

      Appellant: Shri Dhruba Charan Naik
      Public authority: Department of Post, Orissa Circle, Bhubaneshwar. The Sr. Supdt. of Post Offices & CPIO. Shri S.K. Kamila, Director Postal Services – Appellate Authority.
      FACTS:
       
      By an application dated 21.3.2006 addressed to the CPIO, the appellant has requested for information regarding percentage of marks obtained by the last candidate (category wise i.e. OBC/SC/ST) of selected candidates of open market for filling up vacancies of Postal Assistants/Sorting Assistants for the recruitment years 1994, 1995 and 1996 separately,
      pertaining to Sundargarh Postal Division. It appears that the CPIO declined to furnish the information and accordingly he appealed to the AA. By a decision dated 2.5.2006, the AA directed the CPIO to furnish the information sought for by the appellant and accordingly, the CPIO furnished certain information on 9.5.2006, which according to the appellant was incomplete and therefore, he filed an appeal before the Post Master General, who has advised him that the second appeal lies before this Commission and accordingly, the appellant has filed
      this appeal on 25.6.2006. Comments were called for from the CPIO in which the CPIO has furnished full information and it is also stated that similar information has been sent to the appellant. On receipt of the comments and reply, the appellant has written to the CPIO on 17.8.2006, seeking for certain clarification and endorsing a copy of the said letter, the appellant has sought time to file his rejoinder after receipt of clarifications from the CPIO.
       
      DECISION:
       
      From the reply furnished to the appellant as per the comments, I find that whatever information that the appellant had sought, the same has been furnished to the appellant. In his letter dated 17.8.2006 addressed to the CPIO, the appellant has not questioned the information
      furnished but has asked for not only additional information but also raised various queries un connected with the information sought and provided. A far as this appeal is concerned, since the information sought has been provided, the appeal stands closed.
       
      3. Let a copy of this decision be sent to the appellant and CPIO.
       
       


      Sd/-
      (Padma Balasubramanian)
      Information Commissioner


Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy