Jump to content
karira

Punjab: Govt staff leave info personal, can’t be disclosed: Punjab panel

Recommended Posts

karira

Govt staff leave info personal, can’t be disclosed: Punjab panel

 

 

The Punjab State Information Commission has rejected a plea seeking details on ex-India leave of more than 30 days by government employees during the past 10 years of service. The rationale is that such leave, as per norms, constituted a personal matter and had no bearing on the state exchequer.

The Right to Information (RTI) applicant from Sangrur, Prem Kumar Rattan — who had sought the employees’ applications for leave, the sanction, and copies of their passports and visa — also faces legal action as the commission has asked the senior superintendent of police (SSP) of Sangrur to register a case against him for furnishing a false undertaking after he had been refused information of the same nature earlier by the SIC. Information commissioner Surinder Awasthi pointed out that the applicant was aware of the case having been disposed of earlier by him, and had thus requested that the case now not be assigned to him this time.

The latest decision refers to a 2012 judgment of the Supreme Court, which says that salary details, including deductions, copies of memos, show-cause notices, inquiry proceedings and income tax returns, fall in the category of personal information, because disclosure of these would amount to invasion of privacy. “The information sought qualifies to be far more personal than those mentioned in the case decided by the Supreme Court,” says Awasthi’s decision, reiterating that the public information officer (PIO) concerned was not expected to provide information exempted under section 8(1) of the RTI Act.

While it must be mentioned here that the state vigilance bureau is investigating alleged misuse of ex-India leave by government employees, the SIC order says that if information related to ex-India leave were to be furnished, someone could even ask for leave availed within India, and the period thereof could be reduced or increased in the RTI pleas; resulting in no end to such requests and little time for the government departments to perform their core duties.

Explaining its express rationale, the judgment says the employees had taken leave for personal visits and there was no resultant burden on the state exchequer. The availing of leave, whichever kind, due to an employee is governed by service rules which fall under the expression “personal information”, disclosure of which has no relationship with public activity or public interest, it says.

The RTI Act, the apex court verdict says, should not be allowed to be misused or abused, nor be converted into a tool of oppression or intimidation of honest officers.

 

Read More: Govt staff leave info personal, can’t be disclosed: Punjab panel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

Great decision. Only HRD experts have to express their opinion. Is leave a matter of right ? Can they go on such long leave inconveniencing general Public ? What is invasion on privacy if leave particulars are disclosed ? (If any employee proceeds to Canada and states reason as "Visiting Cananada to stay with my son" what is the proposed harm or invasion on privacy. If applicant wishes to know the reason through other sources, in India is that information very difficult and classified as confidential that no one can lay his hands)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • momita
      By momita
      Even before waiting for the outcome in the RTI case seeking property details of IAS and IPS officers, the officials of Haryana government have weeded out the files concerned.
      Even before waiting for the outcome in the RTI case seeking property details of IAS and IPS officers, the officials of Haryana government have weeded out the files concerned. A division bench of the commission has expressed its displeasure to the officers of government and police department for weeding out the files before the outcome of the cases pending before the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the panel.
      The division bench consisting State Information Commissioners Hemant Atri and Yoginder Paul Gupta, in their order pronounced on Friday, directed the State Public Information Officers (SPIOs) of the state government’s Personnel Department and Director General of Police office to re-construct the files with the help of the applicants as well as the commission’s secretariat.
      An RTI activist, PP Kapoor, had approached the Commission after the government did not share property details of the IAS and IPS officers. Apart from Kapoor, officers of Home Department were also present when the case was heard on June 26..
      Speaking to The Indian Express on Saturday, Kapoor said, “A large number of IAS and IPS officers don’t submit their property returns to the governments, hence their details are not put up on the websites. The exercise of weeding out files even before completion of hearing into the matter shows that the government is not serious in disclosing property details of the IAS and IPS officers.”
      In response to Kapoor’s RTI application filed in 2009, the state government had sought consent of IAS officers to share the information but 33 IAS officers had refused for the same while 36 bureaucrats had given their consent.

      View full entry
    • momita
      By momita
      Even before waiting for the outcome in the RTI case seeking property details of IAS and IPS officers, the officials of Haryana government have weeded out the files concerned. A division bench of the commission has expressed its displeasure to the officers of government and police department for weeding out the files before the outcome of the cases pending before the Punjab and Haryana High Court and the panel.
      The division bench consisting State Information Commissioners Hemant Atri and Yoginder Paul Gupta, in their order pronounced on Friday, directed the State Public Information Officers (SPIOs) of the state government’s Personnel Department and Director General of Police office to re-construct the files with the help of the applicants as well as the commission’s secretariat.
      An RTI activist, PP Kapoor, had approached the Commission after the government did not share property details of the IAS and IPS officers. Apart from Kapoor, officers of Home Department were also present when the case was heard on June 26..
      Speaking to The Indian Express on Saturday, Kapoor said, “A large number of IAS and IPS officers don’t submit their property returns to the governments, hence their details are not put up on the websites. The exercise of weeding out files even before completion of hearing into the matter shows that the government is not serious in disclosing property details of the IAS and IPS officers.”
      In response to Kapoor’s RTI application filed in 2009, the state government had sought consent of IAS officers to share the information but 33 IAS officers had refused for the same while 36 bureaucrats had given their consent.

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy