- NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
- shows RTI
- RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
- 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
- The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
- Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
- Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
I am a new member & my name is swami. Can I get the answers for the following queries:
1. Does the citizen of India can have access to the personal information (revenue details) of other citizen?
2. If the Citizen cannot access, then who has the right to access it?
3. Under what conditions govt authorities can access to personal information of the citizens of India?
It would be of great help if the above issues are explained with reference to a case law.
Please enlighten me on the above issues.
Thanks & Regards,
Can a senior officer fine his subordinates for not furnishing information under the Right to Information Act? No, says the Karnataka Information Commission (KIC).
In a recent order, the KIC ruled that penalty under Section 20 (1) can be levied only by the information commissions and that too only on public information officers.
State chief information commissioner K K Misra and state information officer K A Thippeswamy ruled this while hearing a complaint filed by nine officials from Kolar.
They were fined Rs 25,000 each â€” maximum penalty under the RTI Act, 2005 â€” by assistant commissioner of Kolar subdivision for denying information to an applicant.
"The commission is aware that it is responsibility of all concerned, including the PIOs, to provide information sought under RTI Act promptly. Inordinate delays defeat the very purpose of the Act. In case, any official holding information is found to have failed to provide the required information without reasonable cause, he must be dealt with severely and action has to be taken against him. The option of levying penalty under section 20 (1) is, however, not available to the first appellate authority," KIC ruled.
S Narayanaswamy, editor of local weekly, sought details of lands granted and copies of mutations from the tahsildar of Srinivasapura taluq.
After the tahsildar replied that information was not available, the applicant went on appeal before the assistant commissioner,Kolar sub-division.
In a surprise decision, the assistant commissioner, also the first appellate authority, slapped the highest penalty of Rs 25,000 on nine officials â€” from the tahsildar to the second division assistant to even the case worker â€” for having failed to furnish complete information.
Upset with the decision, the officials complained and the KIC set aside the impugned order passed by the assistant commissioner.
The KIC held that the first appellate authority has no powers to impose penalty under the RTI Act, but held that they can initiate disciplinary proceedings for dereliction of duty against the officials concerned.
Only info panels can slap RTI fine-Bangalore-Cities-NEWS-The Times of India