Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
  • 0

Rti related family court




There is one case going on in family court Mumbai.During the case when position for judge was vacant the stage for submitting affidavit was required to come on board. But it could not be happened. Then when new judge was appointed this stage was not come on board and court had skipped the stage and not allowed the lady to file her affidavit. so on this matter we had done RTI and asked family court to give reason for not allowing the lady to submit her affidavit and avidances . also we have asked why the court had not mentioned her stage on board after appointment of new judge ? in reply of RTI Now family court says I) as per section 13 b of high court notification dt 03.09.2009 they are not able to provide the detail II) INFORMATION INCLUDES OPINION, EXPLANATIONS ETC under section 2 of RTI ACT 2005 . But they says we can appeal to Principle judge of family court . so is these valid reason ? under which section we can ask this question ? This is not related directly to case , but it is related to court administration . so please guide .

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Yes, it is valid reason.


The definition of information, as it occurs in Section 2(f), lays down scope of the type of information an applicant can seek. The underlying idea is clearly that the Applicant’s entitlement for information is only in respect of the categories of information mentioned in Section 2(f) read with Sec.2(i) and (j). It is not open to an applicant to ask, in the guise of seeking information, queries to public authorities about the nature and quality of their actions. The RTI Act also does not cast on public authority any obligation to answer queries. Applicant’s right extends only to seek information as defined in Section 2 (f) & (j) either by pinpointing the file, document, paper, record or sample etc, or by mentioning the type of information as may be available with the specified public authority.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

The remedy was to file an appeal against such decision before the appropriate court. RTI is not a tool to question the nature and quality of actions by the public authority.


As per Rule-10(3) of the Maharashtra District Courts Right to Information Rules, 2009, if the information sought by the applicant is in respect of judicial proceedings or record, he shall obtain the information as per the procedure prescribed for obtaining certified copies under the rules and orders for the time being in force in that behalf.


Similarly under Rule-13 of the said rules, following information shall not be supplied:


(b) information which relates to judicial functions and duties of court and matters incidental and ancillary thereto;


(f) information/copies with respect to cases pending in court, shall be obtained from court as per rules and orders in force for the time being.


Opinion and explanation etc mentioned in definition only mean such information held by and under the control of the public authority. What is not on record is not an information.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • crusader
      By crusader
      I want to know that I have got information from Nagar nigam, Can I use it as an evidence in the court of law? What are the provisions related to that?
    • Shrawan
      By Shrawan
      Central Information Commission


      Decision No.292/IC(A)/2006
      F. No.CIC/MA/A/2006/00588


      Dated, the 21st September, 2006


      Name of the Appellant : Sh. Sharabh Dubey, 11/7 Civil Lines, Kanpur –208 001. (U.P.)
      Name of the Public Authority: The British India Corporation Limited, 14/136 Civil Lines, P.B. 77, Kanpur-208 001.
      Facts of the Case:

      The appellant is an employee of the respondent. He was transferred to another Unit of the company. The office order was challenged by him in the Court, which adjudicated on the matter. Subsequently, he has filed a few more petitions on service related matters in the Court. In this backdrop, he has sought documents relating to the legal opinion obtained by the respondent, file notings by the senior officials on the issue of transfer, letters/correspondence with other officials, etc.
      The CPIO has denied the information and sought exemption u/s 8(1)(d) & (g) of the Act.
      The case was heard on 12.9.06. The appellant could not be present. The CPIO and the appellate authority were present. In the course of hearing, the CPIO showed a copy of the petition filed by the appellant in the Court, whic hcontained almost all the documents asked for by him. The CPIO contended that the documents asked for by the appellant relate to the various petitions filed by him in the Court. He, therefore, pleaded that the disclosure of the documents might adversely affect the disputed cases. Hence, the relevant documents are treated as confidential.
      Commission’s Decision:

      There is a dispute between the appellant and the company on service matters, including transfer of the appellant to another unit. The matter is pending before the Court for adjudication. There is every possibility that the appellant would get opportunity for his effective defense. The information sought is in the interest of the seeker. And, as such, there is no overriding public interest, u/s 8(1)(j) of the Act, for disclosure of the information.
      The appeal is therefore dismissed.

      (Prof. M.M. Ansari)
      Information Commissioner


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy