Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
ganpat1956

India has 31.5 million taxpayers

Recommended Posts

ganpat1956

NEW DELHI: In a country of over a billion people, only 31.5 million people pay taxes, and this is after the number of taxpayers has grown by nearly 11 percent between March 2002 and March 2006.

 

In response to a Right to Information (RTI) query by seasoned RTI campaigner P. Hari Kumar, 24, of Kasaragod in north Kerala, the finance ministry has said that the number of taxpayers has increased from 28.4 million in 2002 to 31.5 million in 2006.

 

Replying to another RTI application, the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems) has said that a total of 54 million Permanent Account Numbers (PAN) had been allotted till July 5, 2007.

 

Full news at: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/India_has_315_million_taxpayers/articleshow/2240281.cms

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sagginyou

Dear if u count who all are non-govt persons who pay income tax.,..then u can count them on fingers...

it may include several high profile RTI activists too,...who by their non-sensical questions splurge lots of public money by asking all sorts of stupid questions for which every govt office waste a substantial amount of time and resource....

i can quote some applications ..

1. list of the restricted holidays availed by the govt officers in every department.....(think of the volume as it is an openended RTI application...so all govt offices will need to answer this..) the poor RTI activist pay only 10 rs as fee but how much govt is spending on sending this marvellous peace of question paper to all its subordinate offices....just brother think on this aspect too...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wagh7
Dear if u count who all are non-govt persons who pay income tax.,..then u can count them on fingers...

it may include several high profile RTI activists too,...who by their non-sensical questions splurge lots of public money by asking all sorts of stupid questions for which every govt office waste a substantial amount of time and resource....

i can quote some applications ..

1. list of the restricted holidays availed by the govt officers in every department.....(think of the volume as it is an openended RTI application...so all govt offices will need to answer this..) the poor RTI activist pay only 10 rs as fee but how much govt is spending on sending this marvellous peace of question paper to all its subordinate offices....just brother think on this aspect too...

 

Sagginyou sir,

 

It is true that all Govt./PSU employees pay Income tax correctly and most of Non-govt. persons pay less tax as compared to their income or donot pay tax, they take help of tax consultants to reduce the tax.

 

But, if the information is asked by some citizen and it is the right of the citizen to know that what Public Authorities are doing. It may be volumes, but the applicant is paying for this information.

 

If the department is not knowing the holidays and leave details of their staff taken, then where is the administration?

 

Assume a situation that same question had been asked by some Public representative in Parliment, then could you have told the same answer to them? You never..

 

So, when you cannot deny any information to parliement, you cannot denay to citizen. This is the charming of RTI Act, 2005.

 

Sir, beaing a public servants we have to think citizen as the salary providers for govt., semi-govt., psu employees.

 

rakatkam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
karira
Dear if u count who all are non-govt persons who pay income tax.,..then u can count them on fingers...

it may include several high profile RTI activists too,...who by their non-sensical questions splurge lots of public money by asking all sorts of stupid questions for which every govt office waste a substantial amount of time and resource....

i can quote some applications ..

1. list of the restricted holidays availed by the govt officers in every department.....(think of the volume as it is an openended RTI application...so all govt offices will need to answer this..) the poor RTI activist pay only 10 rs as fee but how much govt is spending on sending this marvellous peace of question paper to all its subordinate offices....just brother think on this aspect too...

 

sagginyou,

 

A long time back, I had decided that I will not get into "catfights" or "dogfights" on this forum. But your two posts (read my reply to your other post in the other thread) made me wake up from slumber.

 

1. Are you a PIO ?

2. Are you a Officer or a Government Servant ?

3. How long have you been in the Government ?

 

Since you seem to be so aggrieved by this Act and "stupid" people like me, please enlighten me:

 

1. What do you mean by "non-sensical" ?

2. Who decides what is "non-sensical" ?

 

The "non-sensical" subject matter of the applications you referred to should have been denied under Sec 7(9) by the "sensible" PIO. Didn't he read the RTI Act ? Probably he was too busy putting the badge of "PIO" on his belly button (like you accuse me of doing, in your following post):

 

http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/2316-now-nail-foreign-tours.html#post11493

 

=====================================

 

Kushal and other Moderators,

 

I request you to please book sagginyou for a "infraction".

His post is totally irrelevant to the thread.

It contains insinuations.

 

I have been called "middleman" by the Prime Minister

I have been called "dalal" by a State minister.

But being called "stupid" by sagginyou is a bit too much !

 

sagginyou, my knowledge is not restricted to the RTI Act. If need be I can call you all kinds of names in 18 different languages, some of which even babblefish will never translate for you ! But not in this forum.

 

DON'T MESS AROUND WITH THE RTI ACT 2005 !

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wagh7

Karira Sir,

 

Wonderful post and good reaction.

 

Sir, I from the depth of my heart, I sincere congradulate and thank you over your reaction, which will definately motivate any sincere RTI Applicant and RTI Activits, not only RTI Activists & applicants any Desh Bhakt who loves India will appreciate you over this post and your efforts to motivate people.

 

Sir, Hatsoff to you. Keep us motivating.

 

rakatkam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ganpat1956

Thread is closed to prevent any further flaming here. All members are requested to familiarise themselves with the posting rules of the forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Similar Content

    • Shrawan
      By Shrawan
      Central Information Commission



      Decision No.285/IC(A)/2006
      F. No.CIC/MA/A/2006/00653
       
      Dated, the 20th September, 2006



      Name of the Appellant : Sh. Pradipta Dutta, B-141 Chittaranjan Park, New Delhi – 110 019
      Name of the Public Authority: Directorate of Income Tax (Legal & Research) (DIT), 3rd floor, Drumshaped Building, I.P.Estate, New Delhi- 110 002. DECISION
       
      Facts of the Case:
      The appellant had sought certain information in the form of queries, whichhave been duly responded by the CPIO and the appellate authority as well. Hehas however filed an appeal before the Commission against the reply of theappellate authority and prayed that the CPIO of DIT (L&R) be directed to furnishinformation with respect to his following queries:
      “Kindly inform why ITOs have been posted at DIT (L&R) even though there is no corresponding post in the same pay-scale at ITJSection, CBDT. What functions are the ITOs expected to discharge at DIT (L&R)?
      Kindly inform why ITOs at DIT (L&R) are being forced, under threat of disciplinary action, to perform the functions of an Asstt.Commissioner without being paid officiating pay.”
      Commission’s Decision:
       
      In its oft-repeated decisions, the Commission has advised the informationseekers that they ought not seek the views and comments of the CPIO on the questions asked by them. Yet, in the garb of seeking information mainly for redressal of their grievances, applications from requesters are filed. The CPIO’s in turn, have also ventured to answer them. Thus, the information seekers as providers have erred in interpreting the definition of information.
      A CPIO of any public authority is not expected to create and generate a fresh, an information because it has been sought by an appellant. The appellant is, therefore, advised to specify the required information, which may be provided, if it exists, in the form in which it is sought by him.
      The information sought relate to duties and responsibilities of ITOs deployed at different locations and the salary or compensation paid to them.Under Section 4(1) of the Act, all the public authorities are required to disclose such information as above. Had it been done by the respondent, the CPIO could have informed the applicant about the source where from he could have obtained the information. The need for filing application for information and this appeal could have thus been avoided. In pursuance of the principle of maximum disclosure, as u/s 4(1) of the Act, the CPIO is directed to disseminate the information so that in future, such applications are minimized.
      The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

      Sd/-
      (Prof. M.M. Ansari)
      Information Commissioner
      Download the Decision from Download segment.


       

    • ganpat1956
      By ganpat1956
      PUNE: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is more than just holding medical camps or running literacy classes in villages close to the factory location. For mentors of the Bharatiya Yuva Shakti Trust (BYST), it means inculcating a sense of fiscal responsibility and values (like paying taxes,) among brand new entrepreneurs. For companies like Cummins India Ltd, it means getting involved in an organisation like the Public Concern for Governance Trust (PCGT), which is spearheading a campaign on eradicating corruption in the country.
       
      BYST, supported by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) as part of its CSR initiatives, ensures its mentors inculcate a sense of social commitment to would-be entrepreneurs. The mentors are themselves usually entrepreneurs, drawn from the small and medium size enterprise (SME) sector.
       
      Pratibha Bhamburkar, partner, Shiv Shakti Paints and mentor with BYST, ex-plained that among her first lessons to the would-be entrepreneur was to impart a sense of fiscal discipline.
       
      "The entrepreneur I was mentoring had to be given directions on the need to pay taxes regularly, that he needs to be registered with the relevant tax authorities, especially now since his turnover is Rs. 40 lakh," Ms Bhamburkar said. Thereby creating an upright corporate citizen.
       
      Dinesh Castellino, vice president legal and company secretary, Cummins India Ltd (CIL) said the engine manufacturer's involvement with the NGO was for its CSR initiatives.
       
      "For us, at Cummins, this is part of our involvement in a social cause, which is also part of our values, of improving the lives of the people and communities in which we operate," Mr Castellino said. He added that CIL is represented on the right to information (RTI) and anti-corruption sub-committees of the PCGT. Two other sub committees, on improving the condition of roads and imparting softer, people- and situation-handling, skills to policemen, are yet to start in Pune.
       
      This is in keeping with CIL's commitment made by its chairman, Anant Talauli-car, at the company's annual general meeting in July 06. He had then said, "We will promote the RTI Act to ensure India becomes a meritocracy," adding that CIL would work with the PCGT, a Mumbai-based Trust.
       
      Taking that commitment forward, Mr Castellino explained that CIL's role is limited to creating awareness about the existing fora for redressal which exist in government departments.
       
      "Government departments have the mechanism to fight corruption. All we plan to do by holding workshops is to make people aware of these mechanisms, which government officials will themselves explain," Mr Castellino stated. For the over Rs. 1400 crore engine maker, this is an activity into which all its eight entities could be roped in, on a need basis.
       
      PCGT plans to start a help desk at its own office, manned two-three hours a day, which will offer help to people on the RTI Act.
       
      CSR for fiscal responsibility & tax payment-Corporate Trends-Companies A-Z -News-The Economic Times

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy