Jump to content
News Ticker
nk agarwal

Long Pendency at CIC

Recommended Posts

nk agarwal

The CICI web site shows 40200 appeals and complaints as pending before the CIC at 13:30pm on 19th July 2015

(1) What purpose the stale info/relief, if at all, the appellant gets, would serve the purpose?

(2) To clear pendency, run of the mill disposal would be the general outcome rather than exceptions - I apprehend.

(3) Unless CIC takes a proactive stance against the PIOs and FAAs, to reduce 2nd appeals and complaints, the pendency is likely to increase in coming years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RAVEENA_O

There are many reasons for increasing SAs.

 

[1] increased awareness of citizens about RTI

[2] attitude of PIOs, FAAs and public authority to suppress / deny information.

[3] frivolous SAs airing merit of issues involved in information sought under RTI.

[4] insufficient number of Information Commissioners.

[5] long duration vacancy of ICs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MANOJ B. PATEL

PIOs and FAAs are 75 % responsible for such situation. For remaining, A flow of RTI applications and ICs are responsible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jps50

No govt wants RTI to work smoothly, since misdeeds of govts will come out and PIL could be problem for politicians and govt officers. Best way is to keep CIC/SICs fractured by not providing adequate and efficient ICs and infrastructure etc. Now only way out for alert citizens is to get adequate ICs. This can be done only through judicial pressure, as it did in case of Chief IC at CIC recently. In Gujarat there is pendency of 6000 appeals and complaints with CIC and only one IC and time lag is 36 months [good governance]. An alert senior citizen [bank officer] and dialysis patient has recently filed writ in HC for adding five more ICs to GIC. Earlier also he had got two ICs added twice through HC orders only. Valuable things do not come cheap. We as alert citizens will have to build up pressure to ensure that CIC/SICs function smoothly. If ICs are prompt in penalising PIOs the inflow will reduce and PIOs and FAAs will discharge their duties properly. For this at least we can create record by referring:

 

Not penalized

http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/blogs/jps50/3140-no-penalty-imposed-under-rti-revised-format.html

 

Let us do what is possible for us. Some thing is better than nothing. This Govt will understand only legal language as far as right based rights of citizens are concerned. This is Gujarat experience of RTI.

Govts want to give charity to citizens in a democracy, as they think that we as citizenry are not mature enough for right based rights after 68 years of Independence.

 

None the less, we could get improvement in functioning of RTI in last 10 year like:

 

1. Video hearing by CIC and some other SICs

 

2. e-filing of RTI applications and appeals for Central Govt and in Maharashtra [only Mantralaya depts at present]

 

3. Advertisement for appointment of ICs at CIC, but we are yet to get adequate non-babus as ICs.

 

4. e-filing of second appeals/complaints at CIC and few SICs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MANOJ B. PATEL

R/sir, you are correct that "If ICs are prompt in penalising PIOs the inflow will reduce and PIOs and FAAs will discharge their duties properly". So far Gujarat is concerned i have seen that these PIOs and FAAs are not at all interested in properly disposal of the RTI applications/appeals as per provisions of Act.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

If there is a will there is a way. They may have to work hard for one or two months. Segregate the appeals priority wise, incase of deemed denials give SCN immediately to provide information and also seek explanation for not providing the information within stipulated period , and prepare office notes where appellant and PIO differ, they can also segregate those exemption applications and take a decision on basis of facts and ready with home work when they come up for hearing and by focussing only on such differences, they can reduce the appeals atleast by 50% within a month.

Now each and every IC takes down the name and hears what was stated in appeal, without doing any home work and prepared with that issue which is contended, the recording process, repetition of names, slow writing etc.consumes long time, and the time for arguments is less and by that time IC is exhausted of such writing and shows impatience and irritation after 5 minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • Latha Ramesh
      By Latha Ramesh
      Report on Monthly Disposal of Cases Year Month Opening Balance Receipt Disposal Closing Balance 2006 April 489 248 97 640 2006 May 640 414 203 851 2006 June 851 495 257 1089 2006 July 1089 509 283 1315 2006 August 1315 492 374 1433 2006 September 1433 486 324 1595 2006 October 1595 349 280 1664 2006 November 1664 513 293 1884 2006 December 1884 731 565 2050 2007 January 2050 608 297 2361
      Officers and Friends,
       
      I got the above figures from CIC. Every month opening balance is increasing more and more...
      Why is this happening? What can be done to reverse this?
       
      Please share your opinions in this thread.
      Thanks.
    • ganpat1956
      By ganpat1956
      MUMBAI: If you have filed a complaint with the Chief Information Commission (CIC) under the Right To Information Act, seeking details about, say, your income tax refunds, there is every possibility that you may have to wait for several months altogether to get a response.
       
      The CIC is the final forum of appeal for thousands of pending complaints under the RTI Act. Under the act, CIC has powers to direct various central government bodies, including income tax, customs, railways, CBI and PMO, to provide information to applicants across the country.
       
      Data available reveals that as many as 3,171 complaints and appeals were pending with the CIC till the end of March 2007. A pendency of over 200 complaints has been building up every month over the last one year even though the CIC has been clearing nearly 400 complaints and appeals in the same period.
       
      In January this year, the number of complaints received was 743, the number of complaints disposed of was 353, and the number of pending appeals and complaints tallied up to 2,425. Incidentally, the CIC has five information commissioners to hear appeals and complaints, which is considered an adequate number to tackle the workload.
       
      The information commission does not have any legal binding to dispose of second appeals and complaints within a specific time period, but RTI activists say that if the commission itself delays in giving orders, then it will have no moral authority to impose time limits on public information officers in various government departments and appellate authorities.
       
      "The public information officer usually has other duties besides answering RTI queries and so does the appellate authority. Yet, the RTI act states that they must do their duty within 30 days. The sole reason for the existence of the information commission is to ensure that the RTI Act delivers the promise to the citizens," RTI activist Shailesh Gandhi said.
       
      Gandhi has now written to chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah for resolving bottlenecks and clearing up appeals on an urgent basis. "Applicants are finding it tough to get information due to huge pendency," Pratap Shah, an RTI applicant, said.
       
      The statistical forecast, according to Gandhi, indicates a likelihood of a pendency of 6,837 cases by the end of December 2007. "The solution lies in stricter action against defaulting PIOs and a faster disposal of cases," he said.
       
      Over 3,000 RTI appeals pending-Mumbai-Cities-The Times of India

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy