Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
  • 0
Sumatha Gomasta

about outside employment and noc by psu company

Question

Sumatha Gomasta

Hello,

Are a psu company made own rules and regulation to giving noc to his employee for another outside employment?a public sector company name Hindustan copper limited notice that employee E0 to E8 if apply for noc...no application will be granted for noc at least four years after joining...If he promoted then another three years wait for noc....?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
RAVEENA_O

Yes, the company can formulate its own HR regulations. Attrition is a major constraint in public sector industries. Best talent is recruited, trained in specific technological fields and after gaining experience these talents are coaxed by private sector offering lucrative salary and perks. Sudden depletion in highly technical or skilled manpower shall be detrimental to Man Power Planning (MPP) and smooth functioning of such units. There is nothing wrong in such policies. Such policies are formulated to attract only those best, who want to remain in the industry. Those who want to switch-over should avoid joining such PSUs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
MANOJ B. PATEL

It is fully at the discretion of your employer to allow NOC for better prospects though as per Govt. guidelines PSU employees should normally be allowed to move from one PSU to another to facilitate free mobility.Further, in order to motivate such movement,Govt. has allowed continuity in service without any break and transfer of retirement benefits to the transfere company provided the application was forwarded through proper channel.Further, normally Bond have no legal validity, since it is a violation of Article 19 of the Constitution,which guarantees Fundamental Right to all citizens to carry on any profession,trade or business.All agreements in restraint of profession are also void U/s 27 of the Indian Contract Act.

Accordingly,you may serve a legal notice asking them to issue the release order immediately and simultaneously lodge a complaint before the Grievance officer of the concerned Administrative Dept.for not issuing the NoC/Release order inspite of Govt. Guideline in this regard.

Please take above actions through a competent lawyer to stregthen your case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Prasad GLN

But Sec.27 is not applicable in a case where specialised training was imparted (employment is also training) and for those agreements that was entered with mutual consent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • Shrawan
      By Shrawan
      Central Information Commission


       
       

      Decision No.292/IC(A)/2006
      F. No.CIC/MA/A/2006/00588


       

      Dated, the 21st September, 2006


       
       

      Name of the Appellant : Sh. Sharabh Dubey, 11/7 Civil Lines, Kanpur –208 001. (U.P.)
      Name of the Public Authority: The British India Corporation Limited, 14/136 Civil Lines, P.B. 77, Kanpur-208 001.
      DECISION
       
      Facts of the Case:
       

      The appellant is an employee of the respondent. He was transferred to another Unit of the company. The office order was challenged by him in the Court, which adjudicated on the matter. Subsequently, he has filed a few more petitions on service related matters in the Court. In this backdrop, he has sought documents relating to the legal opinion obtained by the respondent, file notings by the senior officials on the issue of transfer, letters/correspondence with other officials, etc.
      The CPIO has denied the information and sought exemption u/s 8(1)(d) & (g) of the Act.
      The case was heard on 12.9.06. The appellant could not be present. The CPIO and the appellate authority were present. In the course of hearing, the CPIO showed a copy of the petition filed by the appellant in the Court, whic hcontained almost all the documents asked for by him. The CPIO contended that the documents asked for by the appellant relate to the various petitions filed by him in the Court. He, therefore, pleaded that the disclosure of the documents might adversely affect the disputed cases. Hence, the relevant documents are treated as confidential.
       
      Commission’s Decision:
       

      There is a dispute between the appellant and the company on service matters, including transfer of the appellant to another unit. The matter is pending before the Court for adjudication. There is every possibility that the appellant would get opportunity for his effective defense. The information sought is in the interest of the seeker. And, as such, there is no overriding public interest, u/s 8(1)(j) of the Act, for disclosure of the information.
      The appeal is therefore dismissed.
       

      Sd/-
      (Prof. M.M. Ansari)
      Information Commissioner


    • ganpat1956
      By ganpat1956
      If you are under the impression that RTI Act is for the betterment of the common man, it is time that you changed your perception and wake up to the reality around you. I came across the following report while surfing the web:
       
      " Using the Right to Information Act to access Ministry files and armed with petitions from MPs, Congress MP Naveen Jindal is campaigning for the Railways to purchase rails from his Jindal Steel and Power Limited (JSPL) but the Ministry isn’t buying. "
       
      Full details of this story are available in the online edition of The Indian Express dated November 28, 2006.

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy