Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
ganpat1956

Orrisa forest officials under scanner

Recommended Posts

ganpat1956

Top officials of the Orissa Forest Department have been rewarded with luxury cars and vehicles for looking the other way and allowing companies or individuals to carry out mining or other illegal activity on forestland.

 

Now, thanks to an RTI filed by an activist, it might become clear where those vehicles really came from.

 

The fleet of cars at Aranya Bhawan headquarters does not belong to the Orissa Forest Department.

 

They come as gifts from various companies, a thank you for allowing them to mine or carry out industrial activity on forestland.

 

The Orissa Forest Department has got 40 such vehicles including luxury cars being used by top officials now.

 

Act of extortion

 

This can be interpreted as an act of extortion under the garb of legality and activists say it's plain and simple - bribing.

 

While forest guards and field officials don't have patrol vehicles, top officials have quite openly asked various companies for air-conditioned luxury cars.

 

This led green activist Biswajit Mohanty to file a petition under the RTI Act.

 

''This is a very incestuous relationship because the department is supposed to be a regulatory agency. This is totally condemnable, this is unethical and I would say this is illegal to a large extent. How can you expect an officer to take action against a mine, which has given him a vehicle?,'' said Biswajit Mohanty, Environmentalist.

 

Fortunately, the new state Forest Secretary is open to investigating the matter.

 

''Yes, I think someone did tell me about it and I shall surely look into it. In fact, when someone told me this I said, no, I will not use that car and I said I would use a government vehicle. So let's see how it's happening and why it is happening,'' said Hrishikesh Panda, Secretary, Forest & Environment.

 

Such practices do raise questions about top officials who decide on whether or not forestland is to be allotted for mining and other industrial purposes.

 

So the least the department can do now is return the cars and make sure it doesn't happen again.

 

NDTV.com: Orrisa forest officials under scanner

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • rohitab
      By rohitab
      I was wondering weather public sector come under RTI?
    • Shrawan
      By Shrawan
      Central Information Commission



      Decision No. 297/IC(A)/2006
      F. No. CIC/MA/A/2006/00663
      Dated, the 21st September, 2006



      Name of the Appellant : Shri S. Gangaiah Nayakar, 3/488, Rajapalayam Salai, T. N.C.Alangulam, District - Virudhunagar-626127
      Name of the Public Authority: Indian Overseas Bank, Customers Service Department, Central office, 763,Anna Salai, Channai-600 002. DECISION
       
      The appellant had sought certain information, which was largely furnished to him.
      The CPIO however denied the information relating to the details of loan accounts of another person and other documents submitted by him. The CPIO contented that the information sought is related to personal information, which is exempted u/s 8(1)(j) of the Act. The appellate authority upheld the decision of the CPIO.
      There is no denial of information to the appellant. The Banks are expected to maintain confidentiality of the accounts of its customers and that the documents submitted by its customers do not fall under public domain. Hence, exempted u/s 8(1)(j) of the Act.
      The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
      Sd/-
      (Prof M. M. Ansari)
      Information Commissioner
      Download the decision from Download Segment



Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy