Jump to content
  • 0

Details of applicant



Is appilcants information and details sought confidential?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0


Are details of RTI applications confidential?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

RTI itself is a regime of transparency. RTI Act has no provision that the name and address or personal information of an RTI Applicant is required to be protected from public disclosure. The Act only says that an applicant need not give any reason or personal details for seeking information from a public authority. Once the application is made and details are given voluntarily by the applicant, that cannot be said to be protected from disclosure under any of the exemption provisions of the Act. The proceedings under the transparency law must be transparent and known to all, else the very purpose of RTI Act shall stand defeated.


Kalkota High Court in WP No. 33290 decided on 20.11.2013 held as under:


"In case, the authority would find any difficulty with the post box number, they may insist upon personal details. However, in such case, it would be the solemn duty of the authority to hide such information and particularly from their website so that people at large would not know of the details."


A mere reading of the directives issued on 20-11-2013 by the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in WP 33290 would reveal that the directives to maintain secrecy is with respect to the personal details obtained by the public authority, in such cases, where the Applicant used Post Box or hidden his address, but the department subsequently obtained the details from him.


Thus the force of the Calcutta High Court judgment applies only in respect of those applicants who have hidden their address or personal details, and which the department obtained subsequently. It has no universal application to other applications / applicants who have clearly mentioned and disclosed their addresses or personal details in RTI Application itself.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Prasad GLN

They are not confidential but must be voluntarily uploaded in websites with all relevant details as per DOPT directives, unless applicant specifically requests PIO to keep his details confidential for his personal safety.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • maneesh
      By maneesh
      The recent report of the CSE regarding the use of high levels of pesticides in soft drinks has now prompted a group of well-known names from various fields to go the RTI route.
      On Friday, several activists including Prof Yashpal (former chairman UGC), Aruna Roy (RTI activist), Arundhati Roy, Shanti Bhushan, Arvind Kejriwal and Sandeep Pande (both Magsaysay winners) were present at the inauguration of the RTI kiosk in Jantar Mantar.
      Prof Yashpal and Aruna Roy proceeded to file requests for information under the RTI Act to several government agencies on the occasion.
      The questions addressed to the Central Ground Water Board, Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Food Processing, covered a gamut of issues, including how much water is being extracted by the soft drink bottling plants, whether the ministries had knowledge of sludge containing various chemicals in discharge of several soft drinks as well as if the government knew the amount of caffeine and aspartame being used in the colas.
      Activists file RTI on cola row- The Times of India
    • ganpat1956
      By ganpat1956
      A Chennai based consumer activist has been waging a battle for more than six months to get information from the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Nagpur, under the Right To Information Act.
      The petitioner, Dharmesh Shah of Besant Nagar, Chennai submitted his application to the NEERI, a Central Government Undertaking, on June 14, 2006, seeking information pertaining to the projects undertaken by the institute between 1998 and 2006.
      According to the petitioner, the NEERI failed to furnish the information much beyond the prescribed period of 30 days, following which he made an appeal to the Appellate Authority in the same organisation.
      Only later, the NEERI chose to reply, but that too, refusing to provide the information sought for.
      The institute also claimed that it had received the application only on September 1, while the application was actually submitted in June.
      In its reply, the NEERI said, "Any information pertaining to sponsored/consultancy projects is of confidential nature and is not to be disclosed from NE ERI's side." Aggrieved, the petitioner moved the Central Information Commission seeking to direct the NEERI to furnish the information he sought for under the RTI Act.
      "The NEERI denied me information quoting some rule of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). But neither the public information officer of the NEERI nor the CSIR could clarify or explain the rule to me. It is a grave violation of the RTI Act," Dharmesh Shah said in his appeal before the Central Information Commission. The appeal is to yet to be heard by the Commission.
      Source: The New Indian Express, Chennai Edition (Dec.19,2006)



Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy