Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
Debashis Basu

Any news on priority given to senior citizens by CIC

Recommended Posts

Debashis Basu

Any news on priority given to senior citizens by CIC ?




Pune, June 01: Second appeals filed by senior citizens and differently abled persons under the Right to Information Act (RTI) will now be taken on a high priority basis, according to a directive of the Central Information Commission (CIC) in response to a petition by city-based activist Vihar Durve.


The commission issued the instruction on June 19, after an email by Durve to the Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah on June 17. “The issue was discussed and agreed upon ahead of the agendas for that day. However, I had also made an appeal to consider people below poverty line which was not looked into,” said Durve.



RTI petitions are first filed with the public information officer and then the first appeal is filed with the first appellate authority; the time limit in case of the reply for both the petition as well as appeal being 30 days.


If the petitioner is unsatisfied with this reply, the next resort is a second appeal with the CIC or the SCIC.


Durve said that the CIC which used to take four to six months to hear Central Government related second appeals and more than one and a half years to hear State related second appeals will now be giving priority to the cases in the two categories.


“The demand was to fix a time limit of 30 days for the second appeal too, but the CIC has not committed to this. There are more than 2,000 second appeals pending before the city information commissioner. At least now it becomes mandatory for the State information commissions to give high priority to senior citizens and differently abled persons,” he said.


Durve had sent the email on the basis of a 1996 High court circular, which said, “precedence would be given by courts for hearing and final disposal of cases wherein one of the parties is of advanced age who has crossed 70 years of age.”


However, Durve said that the petitioners should send their age proof and differently abled medical certificate along with the RTI application.


“For, senior citizens and physically challenged if appeals are already pending with the CIC/SCIC, they should write to the CIC/ SCIC about their status,” he said.


(Acknowledged to Express News Service)

  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Abhinav Bohare

Good Info , as delay and sudden turn are two most permanent problems with RTI query

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Debashis Basu



All states have a SIC and we have entire CIC in Delhi. Can we take little initiative to extract this information and ensure this priority treatment to senior citizens and physically challenged by IC. Thanks in advance.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • crusader
      By crusader
      Times of India Report on 25th:
      NEW DELHI: In just one year of implementation of Right to Information (RTI) Act 2005, your right is already in trouble.
      An examination of appeals pending with Central Information Commission (CIC), the final appellate body for RTI Act, reveals that on an average an applicant has to wait at least seven months to be heard. And experts predict that at this rate within two months, this waiting time is all set to increase to two years.
      If this is shocking, then wait till you see how CIC has been disposing these cases. According to a survey conducted by Parivartan, an NGO, of 568 appeals before CIC, 309 cases were disposed of without even being heard.
      Neither the applicant nor the public information officer (PIO) was called in these cases. This means that over 54% of the applicant were not even heard.
      According to RTI Rules 2005, it is upto the appellant to decide whether he wants to heard in person or in writing or not heard at all. The appeal rules lay down that it is the duty of CIC to give them an opportunity to be heard.
      CIC, however, says that it is not possible to call all appellants. Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah said: "The Commission cannot call everyone.
      If we start calling each appellant, we would not be able to dispose of appeals. We call people when we see the need for it." Legal experts, however, say that this is against the principle of natural justice.
      RTI expert and Magsaysay award winner Arvind Kejriwal said: "Their job is not to dispose appeals but to dispense justice. What would happen if Supreme Court starts saying this?" The disposal system is slowing down.
      The number of appeals are increasing at a very fast pace. On September 4 this year, CIC received 89 appeals in a single day. In the last one year till September 8, 2006, CIC had received 3,059 applications.
      Out of this number, it has disposed only 1,531 cases. The waiting period of applicants varies. While R P Jain, a Delhi resident, had to wait 195 days before his case was disposed, Piyush Mahapatra had to wait for 72 days.
      Habibullah said: "We set ourselves a two month target to dispose one case. I agree, this wait is much longer in many cases. But we are trying to improve our system. We have engaged data entry operators to get a system in order. As soon as a case comes to us, we would feed it in our system.
      We are trying to make some changes." Kejriwal, however, disagrees. "There is a need to impose penalties. Since CIC is not willing to impose penalties, the government officers are not scared to deny information and every case goes to CIC.
      At this rate, the waiting period of each appeal would increase manifold in just two months." Of the 1,531 cases disposed so far, CIC has given two orders issuing penalties against officers.
      While it has already withdrawn one order, it is in the process of withdrawing the second one as well.
      [sourse: TOI 25th Sept 2006]
    • armyguy
      By armyguy
      I believe the RTI act will bring citizens closer to democracy.
      For me an application as such doesnot matter much, nor for many of us. What RTI application in true sense matters is that we tell to Government that we are watching and that it is for us the Government is working for. Thus by this way, RTI will make citizens like me to participate in Government and decision making process.
      May be in transition phase, people will go on asking personal question and distroying the correct thing for what RTI is meant for, and in medium term it will slow down the decision making process of the Government bodies because once RTI roles out, it will generate much fear in Officers taking decisions.
      But in long run, it will bring about correct decision making co-terminous with citizens aspiration and thus will bring empowered citizens closer to democracy.


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy