Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
  • 0
Raja_P

How to seek RTI information from High Court or Supreme Court of India regarding Judgments on Converted Christian Child Adoption from Hindu Parents?

Question

Raja_P

Hello RTI India Activists,

 

RTI Question(needs drafting): How to seek information from High Court or Supreme Court of India regarding the Judgments on Converted Christians Child adoption from Hindu Parents during 1991-1995?

Requesting fellow forum members to help me to get relevant information from High Court or Supreme Court. What is the address of PIO of High Court or Supreme Court? Tips to get information faster. Any suggestions are warmly welcomed.

 

My grandmother wrote a WILL to My Friend's Christian NGO organization. She was converted to Christianity from Hinduism. After she was passed away, One of her close relative was challenging the WILL in High Court as he was her adapted son.

 

NGO is in financial crisis. It can hardly survive not more than 4 months roughly. There are children in the NGO Care, Sick and Old. To overcome the situation. We need to win the case in the court at any cost.

 

Facts about the case

 

1. She was childless

2. Converted Christian

3. During 1991 She had adopted a Hindu grandson of her Younger Sister Son's-Son by the force her close family members using Hindu ritual and registration. He refused to live with the foster parents and left the house to live with biological parents. After her dismissal he came to know about the assets she had possessed earlier.

 

 

Thank you all in advance

Raja

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
karira

Under RTI Act 2005, you can only get information "held" by a public authority.

 

Judgments of High Courts and Supreme Courts are in the public domain.

 

You will have to make your own efforts to search their websites and get the judgments which are relevant to you.

 

The PIOs of the Courts are not going to make that effort for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Prasad GLN

You can get that specific information available on their records in the same form, they can not collect and collate or compile information, because applicant is seeking such information.

In your case as the information has to be collected and compiled in specific format.

When the information is not available in that form, it is not information,

only if they wanted to provide information, exemptions and larger public interest steps in.

Even when there is clear record of one or two sentences, the court SPIOs never care for RTI,

Think of alternatives, as RTI is not useful or serve your purpose with Courts in specific.

 

However you can make google search with key words and can get all judgments required. (Providing reply on the basis of practical experience)

It costs nothing to make a sincere attempt through google search.

 

Any application to HC should be addressed to State Public Information officer. Search website of Individual courts to locate SPIO, format of application and fees which differ from HC to HC.

The same holds good, and you can find RTI rules in SC website.

Even after going through the post several times with all sincerity to really help, unfortunately I could not understand as to exactly member requires as guidance in his issue to suggest alternatives.

 

I could only arrive to only one issue:

Whether the will is legally enforceable under law or not ?

The adverse possession of assets, the nature of assets etc., require thorough knowledge of such religious laws.

Better to post this query in those forums specialized in litigation.

But I can not assure you any response from those forums as experts never participate in such replies like in this forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Raja_P

Thank you for answering my query.

 

I thought RTI information would make my case stronger with valid and approved data from SPIO. I should take a better strategy to arrive at a solution. Earlier I had made great Google searches, found some useful information regarding the other religion adoptions. It is only the information available with me right now.

 

Could you suggest me a better strategy to make my case stronger without getting prolonged another few more years?

 

Regards

Raja

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
sharmajee

Pl engage a good competent lawyer and seek his professional help, in respective high court where 'Will' is under challenge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Prasad GLN

You can file Advancement of hearing petition through advocate, showing the urgency, of orphanage home and include the latest financial statement or bank account statement, the inmates at present.

Definitely the court has to consider and hear your petition out of turn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • Priya De
      By Priya De
      Find here the original Supreme court judgement on Aadhaar.
      (1)        The requirement under Aadhaar Act to give one's demographic and biometric information does not violate fundamental right of privacy.
      (2)        The provisions of Aadhaar Act requiring demographic and biometric information from a resident for Aadhaar Number pass three­fold test as laid down in Puttaswamy (supra) case, hence cannot be said to be unconstitutional.
      (3)        Collection of data, its storage and use does not violate fundamental Right of Privacy.
      (4)    Aadhaar Act does not create an architecture for pervasive surveillance.
      (5)        Aadhaar Act and Regulations provides protection and safety of the data received from individuals.
      (6)        Section 7 of the Aadhaar is constitutional. The provision does not deserve to be struck down on account of denial in some cases of right to claim on account of failure of authentication.
      (7)        The State while enlivening right to food, right to shelter etc. envisaged under Article 21 cannot encroach upon the right of privacy of beneficiaries nor former can be given precedence over the latter.
      (8)        Provisions of Section 29 is constitutional and does not deserves to be struck down.
      (9)        Section 33 cannot be said to be unconstitutional as it provides for the use of Aadhaar data base for police investigation nor it can be  said to violate protection granted under Article 20(3).
      (10)      Section 47 of the Aadhaar Act cannot be held to be unconstitutional on the ground that it does not allow an individual who finds that there is a violation of Aadhaar Act to initiate any criminal process.
      (11)      Section 57, to the extent, which permits use of Aadhaar by the State or any body corporate or person, in pursuant to any contract to this effect is unconstitutional and void. Thus, the last phrase in main provision of Section 57, i.e. “or any contract to this effect” is struck down.
      (12)      Section 59 has validated all actions taken by the Central Government under the notifications dated 28.01.2009    and 12.09.2009 and all actions shall be deemed to have been taken under the Aadhaar Act.
      (13)      Parental consent for providing biometric information under Regulation 3 & demographic information under Regulation 4 has to be read for enrolment of children between 5 to 18 years to uphold the constitutionality of Regulations 3 & 4 of Aadhaar (Enrolment and Update) Regulations, 2016.
      (14)      Rule 9 as amended by PMLA (Second Amendment) Rules, 2017 is not unconstitutional and does not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21 & 300A of the Constitution and Sections 3, 7 & 51 of the Aadhaar Act. Further Rule 9 as amended is not ultra vires to PMLA Act, 2002.
      (15)      Circular dated 23.03.2017 being unconstitutional is set aside.
      (16)      Aadhaar Act has been rightly passed as Money Bill.  The decision of Speaker certifying the Aadhaar Bill, 2016 as Money Bill is not immuned from Judicial Review.
      (17)      Section 139­AA does not breach fundamental Right of Privacy as per Privacy Judgment in Puttaswamy case.
      (18)      The Aadhaar Act does not violate the interim orders passed in Writ Petition (C) No. 494 of 2012 and other Writ Petitions.

    • Priya De
      By Priya De
      In this context a reference was made to the Hon’ble Supreme Court decision in 2011 (8) SCC 497 (CBSE Vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay), wherein it was held as under: 35.....
      “It is also not required to provide ‘advice’ or ‘opinion’ to an applicant, nor required to obtain and furnish any ‘opinion’ or ‘advice’ to an applicant. The reference to ‘opinion’ or ‘advice’ in the definition of ‘information’ in section 2(f) of the Act, only refers to such material available in the records of the public authority. Many public authorities have, as a public relation exercise, provide advice, guidance and opinion to the citizens. But that is purely voluntary and should not be confused with any obligation under the RTI Act.” 

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy