Jump to content

Report Card on the Performance of Information Commissions in India

According to a “Report Card on the Performance of Information Commissions in India” prepared by Satark Nagrik Sangathan (SNS) and Centre for Equity Studies (CES), transparency is a key to promoting peoples’ trust in public institutions. The assessment found that several ICs were non-functional or were functioning at reduced capacity, despite large backlogs, as the posts of commissioners, including that of the chief information commissioner (CIC), were vacant during the period under review. In many cases, the appointments of information commissioners were found to be set aside by courts due to lack of transparency in the process of appointment and for being in violation of the provisions of the RTI Act and directions of the Supreme Court.
In addition, the Report, says, “By failing to disclose information on their functioning, ICs continue to evade real accountability to the people of the country whom they are supposed to serve. The legal requirement for the central and state information commissions to submit annual reports every year to Parliament and state legislatures respectively, is to make, among other things, their activities transparent and available for public scrutiny. However, very few ICs fulfil this obligation, and even fewer do it in time”. 
As part of the assessment, and in order to access information about the functioning of information commissions, both SNS and CES filed RTI applications with the 28 state information commissions (SIC) and the Central Information Commission (CIC). A total of 169 RTI applications were filed seeking identical information from all the 29 information commissions. The RTI applications were tracked to assess how each information commission performed as a public authority, in terms of maintaining and disclosing information. Three information commissions from Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu did not respond to, or even acknowledge, the RTI applications filed within stipulated time.
"Several ICs, like from Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh rejected requests for information invoking provisions seemingly in violation of the RTI Act. In all these cases, an appeal was filed against the denial of information. However, till the time of publication of this report, the requisite information had not been disclosed," the report says.
Apart from Tamil Nadu, three State Information Commissions (SICs), Odisha, Sikkim and Kerala returned the RTI applications citing procedural deficiencies.
Only 13 out of 29 ICs provided full information in response to the RTI applications filed as part of this assessment. Of the 107 chief information commissioners for whom data was obtained, the overwhelming majority (84%) were retired government servants including 67% retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers and another 17% from other services. Of the remainder, 10% had a background in law (5% former judges and 5% lawyers or judicial officers).

Resistance from banks in revealing Loan details to corporate entities

The RTI query, sent to the Ministry of Finance, sought details on individual exposure of various PSBs to corporate borrowers. The questions that were asked in the RTI query sought information on the loans given to the Reliance Industries, Adani Group, GVK Group, GMR and Jaypee Group. The RTI was first directed to the Finance Ministry, which then forwarded the RTI request to various banks asking them to provide the information. The RTI had questions on the money loaned to big industrial houses by government-run banks. However, all public sector banks except Andhra Bank and Allahabad Bank have refused to divulge information citing either the 'personal nature' of questions or how they don't fit under the provisions of the RTI Act. 
In their reply to the RTI query, the banks have said that the information available with banks under "fiduciary relationship" is exempted from disclosure.
Read about: Fiduciary Relationship under RTI
While Andhra Bank and Allahabad Bank have disclosed the loans given to big corporates, all other lenders refused to do so. Banks which did not disclose any detail in their reply to the RTI query include State Bank of India (SBI), Bank of Maharashtra, Corporation Bank, Indian Bank, Canara Bank, UCO Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Bank of India, Bank of India and Syndicate Bank. Earlier this month, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley informed the Rajya Sabha that loans worth Rs 81,683 crore were written-off by public sector banks (PSBs) in 2016-17.
Country's largest public sector lender, the SBI, said, "The information sought by you under point number three to eight is the third party personal information held by the bank in a fiduciary capacity, the disclosure of which is not warranted for any larger public interest and as such is exempted from disclosure."

Upper limit of Rs 50 imposed on RTI Fee by Supreme Court

The Supreme Court fixed on Tuesday an upper limit of Rs 50 as application fee that government authorities can charge those seeking information under the right to information (RTI) act, the country’s transparency law.
Also, a bench of justices AK Goel and UU Lalit said public authorities cannot ask for more than Rs 5 for each page as photocopying charge, and an applicant need not mention the “motive” while filling out the application form.
The order came on petitions challenging high fees set by different public bodies, including high courts and state assemblies.
The decision can be downloaded from here:

43 years for RTI case finalisation in West Bengal- study

A biennial study conducted by Satark Nagrik Sangathan and Centre for Equity Studies has revealed a grim picture of RTI Act implementation with waiting time at information commissions running in years and commissions in several states becoming non-functional owing to unfilled vacancies. The study has found that if an RTI appeal were to be filed in West Bengal state information commission on November 1, 2017, it would be disposed of in 2060 – after 43 years. In Kerala, it would take six years six months and Odisha 5 years 3 months. The main reason for such a long waiting time is the reduced number of information commissioners that commissions are working with. 
The report has brought out, what it calls a “concerning trend”. The information commissions, which are the last resort for the common man to complain against wrongful denial of information, are increasingly returning cases. The highest number of cases have been returned by CIC, followed by Gujarat, Assam and Uttarakhand.
  • 0

Kakching Municipal Council, Manipur demands higher amount of Security Deposit



I am an owner of a wooden stall shop allotted by Kakching Municipal Corporation, Kakching, Manipur and have been running since about 30 years. Recently the corporation starts to build up a new pucca shop (area size 11 x 8.5' ) nearby the wooden shops and the councillors of the corporation informed me to pay an amount of Rs. 5.37 lakhs as deposit for shifting to the new pucca building when after completion of the pucca shop and they will destruct the old wooden shops. I have no enough money to pay the deposit. They never consult me / us (owner of the wooden stalls) before starting build up the pucca, if I / we can afford or not for a the pucca shop. The construction is not under any government plan or sanction, only the aim is they will get profit from the allottees by collecting more amount over the necessary security deposit. In this matter, I want to know from the concern authorities that what are the rules of deposits for any government properties or assets which are allotted to the public individuals. And I want to face the councillors profit earning acts.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Sunil Ahya

File a RTI application with the Public Information Officer of the Kakching Municipal Corporation and seek a photocopy as follows:


Description of Information Required:


1. Please provide a certified photocopy of Rules, Regulations, Circular, Policy, Guidelines, Government Resolution (GR), Provision in an Act or any other such provisions in a law for the time being in force, wherein has been noted the criteria & procedure for destruction of old wooden shops and construction of new pucca shops.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Prasad GLN

First stop worrying. Contact a local banker, and ask him to advance for the deposit to corporation as a loan repayable with 8% rate of interest as you are an artisan and wants it towards capital and ask him to deduct interest alone in monthly installments and give the Bank an undertaking that if at all the deposit is refundable it will be refunded by Corporation to Bank. The bank can easily provide this facility and they can demand corporation to issue a receipt in the Name of Bank a/c artisan.

For example if SBI is willing to advance that amount, they will directly pay to corporation in your name, and collects such receipt from corporation and the receipt will be issued in the name of SBI A/c...Ibotombi...

Thus there is no loss for you, for the corporation and for the bank. You have to pay only interest and if you can pay in 120 monthly installments entire deposit is yours as saving and helps your children to continue the shop.

Always take everything in a positive angle and make prior planning for better prospects.


If you have any problem in understanding my reply, get a hard copy and show it to Manager of any Bank.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • archakam
      By archakam
      I have Received A replay from TTD Tirupati saying they are exempted from RTI. How a institution reciving thousands of cores from public exempted from RTI and can they be exempted from answering the queries from the people who contribute to them. On what grounds they are exempted if they are exempted. If we want to make them to come under RTI what to be done pl replay and thanks in advance
    • narendra daklia
      By narendra daklia
      pl. guide procesure/format for complaint in cic


Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy