Jump to content
Atul Patankar

Under Right to Information Act, Scarlett’s mother questions murder probe

Recommended Posts

Atul Patankar

As reported at www.thaindian.com on 12 March 2009


Panaji, March 12 (IANS) Fiona Mackeown, the mother of slain British teenager Scarlett Keeling, has filed a Right to Information (RTI) application seeking details of the Goa police’s investigation into her daughter’s mysterious death February last year.


The application was received by the police early this week. Police authorities, who have been target of Fiona’s criticism for bungling the investigations into Scarlett’s murder, are not sure how the RTI application should be handled.


A senior police official maintained foreigners do not have the right to apply under the Right to Information Act. “Only citizens can ask queries under RTI. Foreigners cannot. Plus she has sent it across from UK by e-mail without paying the mandatory court fees,” the official said.

The preamble to the RTI Act clearly says that it can be used only by Indian citizens, the official added.


Confirming the receipt of the RTI query from Fiona, Superintendent of Police (North) Tony Fernandes Thursday said: “We have received the RTI application. In all likelihood, we’ll forward it to the Central Bureau of Investigation, because they are investigating the case now. “I have brought the matter to the notice of my superiors, who will take a final call.”


Source: Under Right to Information Act, Scarlett’s mother questions murder probe

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • sidmis
      By sidmis
      BCCI not covered by RTI law
      Press Trust of India
      Friday, January 25, 2008 7:42 PM (New Delhi)
      Reported by NDTV.com: BCCI not covered by RTI law
      The country's apex cricket governing body BCCI could not be made accountable to provide information to citizens under the Right to Information law, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held.
      In a recent order, the CIC rejected a citizen's plea to seek from the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) certain information about its affairs.
      Nagpur-based Anil Chintaman Khare in his RTI application had submitted that BCCI was registered under the Societies Registration Act and should be termed a "public authority" for the purposes of making it accountable under the transparency law.
      The BCCI, however, contested the applicant's claim stating that despite being registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, it was not constituted under the Constitution or any law made by the Parliament or any state legislature.
      Concurring with BCCI's stand, Information Commissioner Padma Balasubramanian said: "Registration under an Act is different from being established under it. Merely because BCCI is registered under the Societies Registration Act, does not bring it under the purview of RTI Act."
      In its arguments before the Commission, the BCCI had contended that it did not receive any funds, directly or indirectly, from the Centre and also did not have on its board any nominee from any government.
      The applicant said BCCI received a lot of tax benefits from the government and hence should be made answerable to the people of the country.
      The Commission came to its decision after finding that BCCI did not fall under any of the categories required to bring any public office under the RTI Act.
    • karira
      By karira
      Maharashtra Gas Limited (MGL) which supplies pipeline gas to Mumbai has been ruled as a Public Authority.
      The full decision of the CIC is attached to this post.
      It has many arguments for and against being a Public Authority - will be interesting for members to note for future references.
      The appellant was Mr Semlani, a RTI Activist, who passed away recently in Mumbai at the age of 72.


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy