Jump to content
Abhishek Kumar Choubey

Abhishek Choubey vs chhattisgarh vyavsayik pariksha mandal rti second appeal decision 71 / 2017

Recommended Posts

Abhishek Kumar Choubey

Abhishek Choubey vs chhattisgarh vyavsayik pariksha mandal rti second appeal decision 71 / 2017

New Doc 2018-01-17 (1)_1.jpg

20180117_195020.jpg

IMG_20180117_193431_822.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

Sir,

It is difficult to read such small fonts, and members of the forum are from entire India. If you require precise guidance, just list out important points in decision and seek further guidance . There is only one way as remedy and going for writ in HC depending on the decision. Whether you can afford it or not is not known, and whether it is worth it or not has to be decided by experts in the forum. Please understand the problems involved in posting such images and long orders and follow practical way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • Shree Vathsan
      By Shree Vathsan
      Can the General Diary of the police station where particulars of "All the details in r/o criminals arrested and entry of arrival/departure of all enrolled police officers on duty with nature of their duties, duty performed and places visited etc."   are maintained be inspected and photo copies sought from a particular police station under RTI?
      Is there any particular clause/section that needs to be quoted for inspection under RTI? Any format available for inspection under RTI?
    • Shree Vathsan
      By Shree Vathsan
      The person in the article below is me. I had a corporation official visit my house with the RTI and asking for my whereabouts. However the PIO has sent a reply on 8/5/19  stating that AE Div 170 is the person responsible for inspecting the banners on the particular stretch. It is after finalising this reply that I had got a call from AE Div 170 on 8/5/19 evening and a person visited my house on 9/5/19. The reply sent by PIO dated 8/5/19 was received on 11/5/19.
      Further The AE has stated that he has inspected the stretch and removed illegal banners immediately. However I have material evidence that the banners remained in the same place from afternoon till late night. Only the persons who kept the banner had removed them. So can I penalise the PIO for providing false and incorrect information. 
       

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy