Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed

Convene periodic conferences/seminars to sensitize, familiarize and educate the PIO about RTI

Recommended Posts


The Commission instructs the Respondent to convene periodic conferences/seminars to sensitize, familiarize and educate the concerned officials about the relevant provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 for effective discharge of its duties and responsibilities.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

The consolidation of all good court judgments and earlier decisions.

The most important thing that has to be understood from thee comprehensive decision is even when public authorities deliberately provided misleading information stating that it is their record, IC can not proceed against PIO stating that PIO has provided incorrect, false and misleading informatin.

He is concerned with as to whether information was provided or not, and if PIO states that it is his record. So RTI is not the ultimate remedy if PIO prefers to play games with applicants by feeding deliberately incorrect, false and fraudulent information to mislead the applicant. Generally it happens with power rich Public Sector undertakings, who are endowed with plethora of advocates, who charge exorbitant fees for devising such ways in misleading such PSU.

Coming to the point, the pertinent decision part is as follows:

The purport of the RTI Act is to enable the appellants to effectively pursue the said dispute. The question, as to what inference if any is to be drawn from the response of the PIO of the respondent Bank to the RTI application of the appellants, is to be drawn in the said proceedings and as aforesaid the proceedings under the RTI Act cannot be converted into proceedings for adjudication of disputes as to the correctness of the information furnished.”

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy