Jump to content
News Ticker
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
RBCHAVAN

2nd appeal

Recommended Posts

RBCHAVAN

I had asked for the copy of the construction permission with plan of my adjoining property. The first appeal was dismissed as the third party ( adjoining property owners) had not given the consent to provide the information which was accepted by the  appellant authority.In the 2nd appeal the commission order was as follows" In future the respondent must provide the information as asked by the applicant except the information as in section 8(1) of the RTI act 2005 and by asking the applicant to pay the fees as per section 7(3)(a). Information must be provided after receiving the necessary fees. in case the information is not available in your office the same has to be transferred under section 6(3) within 5 days and to inform the applicant , it is directed. Also it is warned that in future  all applications must be handled as per RTI rules and the matter is closed"  No where has the commission directed  the PIO to furnish the information.  It appears as the commissioner has explained the rules of the act to the PIO. The order is not as speaking one . what is the use if such orders are passed after waiting for such a long time.My appeal no. was KIC10960APL2018.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

The order though stated specifically to provide information has warned PIO to provide the information except exempted under Sec. 8 (1) which means that as there is no exemption of this public record, the orders are for providing you copy of the plan approved by the authority which is within the custody of PIO.  The following as per your post is relevant.

 In future the respondent must provide the information as asked by the applicant except the information as in section 8(1) of the RTI act 2005 and by asking the applicant to pay the fees as per section 7(3)(a). Information must be provided after receiving the necessary fees

Immediately write to FAA for directing PIO to provide the information as a sanctioned copy by authority is not exempted under Sec.8 (1) and also mark this to SIC.

Wait for a month and then make complaint to SIC stating that PIO has continued his old attitude and violating RTI rules and regulations.

The plan submitted to Public authority by a citizen is a public record and there is neither invasion on the privacy of any third party nor it is personal information exempted under RTI.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RBCHAVAN
Posted (edited)

I wrote to the FAA on 24/01/2019 as told above. After 30 days I wrote (request not complaint) to the SIC where I received a letter from the Under Secretary KIC informing me that my request cannot be considered and the matter(2nd appeal ) has already been settled on 20/12/2018 as ordered by SIC. Will I be able to get the information.                             

Edited by RBCHAVAN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

Have you written on the top as heading Noncompliance of SIC Orders Complaint  If not send it once again to SIC.

Before

Karnataka State Information Commission, Bangalore

Decision No:

Against: State Public Information Officer,..............

Complainanant:............................

Complaint on Non compliance of SIC orders.

 

Appellant submit that SPIO, has not implemented the orders of SIC as referred above, inspite of sending such non compliance notice.  Appellant prays for directions to SPIO to provide the information as expeditiously as possible.

 

{lace

Date                                                                                                                                                    Appellant.

I have read the post and noted your concern.  But it is not proper to point out the mistake of IC, hence let them realize the mistake in their orders through this complaint.  Also file fresh RTI Application and state the SIC  decision.  Mark this complaint to spio and enclose a copy of RTI Application relevant to that SIC decision.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy