Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
nk agarwal

Violation of Provisions of RTI Act-2005

Recommended Posts

sppataskar
On 9/11/2019 at 2:07 PM, nk agarwal said:

Does the Section for delay in RTI Act-2005 speaks to prove malafide ?    Yes,it is must.  As per Section 20(1) of the Act, malafidely denied the  request for information or knowingly given incorrect,  incomplete information.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
koteswararaonerella

This comes in APPELLATE STAGE  and not in ORIGIONAL STAGE 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Deepak Dang

OTS accepted by bank for Rs.50000/= in 2003 but prooceds deposited in 2004 without closing the account.  The applicant asked for “No dues Certificate”.  It was refused.  The Bank took the possession of Car under SARFAESI Act-2002 & sold it.  The customer was not informed the facts.  He considered that the car was stolen & filed claim with Insurance co. The Co. Finalized claim & deposited it to A/C holder’s account. Again the fact was not informed.  A civil Suit was filed on wrong affidavit concealing the facts.  It was also informed to court that documents demanded by A/C holder were destroyed as per policy.  On this affidavit the case was dismissed.  The applicant asked information/ documents of the account including account statement in 2012 which was provided in July 2019 at the stage of IInd appeal with CIC.  The destruction of record & other facts pleaded by Bank were taken seriously by CIC & a  show cause notice was issued alongwith penalty of Rs. 25000/= was imposed.  The CPIO was advised to provide all the information within 10 days.  Thus violation of provision was proved by inordinate delay & concealing information.  The A/C holder/ Applicant received OTS without further payment. RTI IS A POWERFUL WEAPON.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

I have yet to hear such gross negligence and irresponsible attitude of the bank and members will be thankful if a link of such CIC decision is provided.

What about compensation for harassment and refund etc ?

The bank should not be left like that for harassing a consumer .

The final lesson is be prompt in repaying the loans and avoid highhandedness of the bank .  Authorities view defaulters as criminals while deciding the cases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy