Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed

Question

Shree Vathsan
Posted (edited)

 

I had filed 3 RTIs asking for DPR of Madurai Smart City projects. They have denied information saying it has Drawing, Elevation, Plan, Section, DPR, Estimate, Structural Drawing, Note File & Current File , Agreement, Bidder furnished bid document  and is more than 1000 pages and is voluminous information.

However I have specifically asked for information in electronic form like CD. 

They have also quoted a State Information Commission SA-11683/2016 dated 02.02.2017 order stating that information supplying which causes hurdles in day to day functioning of office is exempted.

 

Sent from my SM-J510FN using RTI INDIA mobile app

 

 

 

Edited by Shree Vathsan
added few info including SA appeal no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Prasad GLN
Posted (edited)

Go for First appeal.  The information can not be rejected simply because the information is voluminous in nature, as there was no such exemption stated for denying information in Sec.8 (1).  If the information is really voluminous, they have to state that and offer inspection, and giving opportunity of such noting down relevant information and obtaining specific information in certified copies or using mobile camera to obtain such copies direct, but they can not deny information.

Grounds for Appeal: SPIO can either provide information or deny information stating such exemption in Sec.8 (1) of RTI Act.  In several CIC decisions, it was clearly stated that information voluminous is not the reason for denial of information.  The appellant may be informed of such volumes and an opportunity of inspection should be given permitting for obtaining such copies needed.

As the denial is not in confirmity  with Sec. 8 (1) of RTI Act stipulated for denials, and as the information is for larger public interest and there can not be exemptions, this first appeal.

PRAYER: SPIO may be directed to provide such information as expeditiously as possible without any fees.

You can also mention the following HC decisions in your first appeal;

https://rtiindia.org/forums/topic/146257-cctv-maintenance-first-appeal/

 

Edited by Prasad GLN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Shree Vathsan

Prasad ji I had specifically stated in my RTIs to provide the information sought in electronic form (CD). However the PIO has asked me to visit office and to inspect and take copies.

Why dont they host the DPR in the Madurai Corporation website under voluntary disclosure when they use 1000 crores of public money for these projects?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Prasad GLN
Posted (edited)

As citizens, let us focus on Information alone.  If the information is available in electronic form, they must provide it and they can not state any excuses.  Go for first appeal as there is no option.

In the blog, Madras HC decision link was provided and it serves your first appeal purpose.

Edited by Prasad GLN
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • damodard29
      By damodard29
      I need to know all the RTI laws and sections under which cpio/spio and PIO and also FAA and CIC,  should not reject the information towards the government employee regarding his education qualification details, moveable and immovable property returns as per the record from his govt office to be made public whenever its been seeked by any citizen of India Being suspect to be forged. 
    • karira
      By karira
      Chief Information Officer is not a Court for the purpose of Contempt of Courts Act
      4. First and foremost, I am of the opinion that the Chief Information Officer is not a Court for the purpose of Contempt of Courts Act. Section 18 of the Right to Information Act cloths the said authorities with certain powers of a Court. In Sub-Section (3) of Section 18, it is provided as under:- "18(3) The Central Information Commission or State Information Commission, as the case may be shall, while inquiring into any matter under this section, have the same powers as are vested in a civil court while trying a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in respect of the following matters, namely:- (a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of persons and compel them to give oral or written evidence on oath and to produce the documents or things; (b) requiring the discovery and inspection of documents; (c) receiving evidence on affidavit;
      (d) requisitioning any public record or copies thereof from any Court or office;" Section 20 of the Right to Information Act pertains to penalties, which can be imposed when it is found that the Public Information Officer or the Public Information Officer has, without any reasonable cause, refused to receive an application for information or has not furnished information within the time specified under Sub-Section (1) of Section 7 or malafide denied request for information or knowingly given incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroyed information, which was the subject matter of the request or obstructed in any manner in furnishing information. 
      It can thus be seen that all acts or omissions connected with information which is mala fide withheld or information supplied is incorrect or incomplete or misleading, are dealt with under Section 20 by making such action penal. In this context, if one peruses Section 18, it clearly emerges that Information Commission is entrusted with the powers of Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for specified purposes such as summoning and enforcing attendance of persons and to compel them to give evidence, requiring the discovery and inspection of documents, receiving evidence on affidavit, requisitioning any public record or copies for issuing summons for examination of witnesses or documents. Such powers cannot be construed as converting the said authority into a Court for all purposes much less for the purpose of Contempt of Courts Act.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy