- NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
- shows RTI
- RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
- 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
- The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
- Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
- Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
I have given my LL.B 5th sem. exam and after declaration of result i was not satisfied (GOT ATKT in 1 sub. But my paper was good) with my result so I fill an rti to provide photocopy of my answesheet but they refused by saying that university will only give answercopy by filling their on answer copy request form other then they can't. Also the form should be fill under 1 week declaration of result.
After this I fill 1st appeal but the result was same. Now what should I have to do, I know you will say that go to 2nd apeal.
But what is more beneficial in my case Complaint under section 18 or 2nd apeal under 19. Actually I have re-exam after 6 months and it takes almost 1 to 2 year disclose of my appeal. So what is best option
What is best option for me for fast result appeal or complaint
It's official. A student studying under any Government-run University or College anywhere in India can now opt to view their corrected answer sheets by applying for it like they would file any RTI petition.
The Central information Commission (CIC), the body that governs the working of all Information Officers within government departments and agencies, has now upheld the Supreme Court in 2016 that said that a student's exam paper was a piece of information, a manuscript, and should be up for scrutiny.
This may effectively sound the death knell for re-evaluation and photocopy fees — which are known to range from a few hundred rupees to Rs 1500 and more. In fact, it was the excessive levy of this fee that led to a suit being brought before the SC against the CBSE, eventually leading to the ruling.
Universities complain that it increases work for them
The respondents in the case, University of Delhi, said that the decision would hinder the mechanism that is already in place to deal with this issue. They said the process would become cumbersome since they (the evaluation committees/ institutes) would be required to maintain two separate mechanisms — one for providing the hard copy as per their own regulation and another for inspection of answer sheet as per the RTI Act. They were also worried that the inspection process could lead to students taking digital images of their answer scripts.
However, the commission felt that the issue involved a larger public interest affecting the student's future which would affect their right to life and livelihood. The order further noted, "The marks obtained by the student would affect their future career prospects which in turn would ostensibly affect their life to life and livelihood. Deprive a person of his right to livelihood and you shall have deprived him of his life."
The Commission also trashed the excuse that the decision would make the process cumbersome since "timely access to information is the essence of the provisions of the RTI Act and denial of such information could prejudice a student's future career prospects and right to their livelihood." With regard to students misusing the answer sheets, the commission felt that the issue can be dealt with the appropriate public authority and that was no reason to stop the students from gaining access to their papers.