Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
RBCHAVAN

decision in 2nd appeal

Recommended Posts

RBCHAVAN

Sir, 

     In one case (2nd appeal)  I had asked regarding the status of the applications given for sub division of land.The SIC gave notice under section 18(3)(a) & (d) for 4 times to the PIO & FAA . Also the SIC asked why a fine of Rs.25000/- under section 20(1)should not be imposed in every notice for their non attendance and not furnishing the information. Inspite of the 4 notices the PIO & the FAA never turned up for the hearing.In one notice prior to the decision date the SIC had informed me (by ordinary post )to appear for the hearing.As I did not appear the SIC dismissed my appeal saying that the appellant had no  interest  in receiving the information as I had not replied to the notice regarding the information received or not  nor appeared  before the SIC. Also no fine was imposed on the PIO. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

Being a regular member, you are aware as to the opinion of several experts that appellants should evince keen interest to bring a logical end to an issue and attendance to personal hearing is most essential to get a favourable decision.  Either you can approach the HC or write a grievance to IC clarifying your stand for reopening the case. as no decision was delivered after personal hearing.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy