Jump to content

Punjab official fined Rs.20250 for delaying info under RTI

Recommended Posts


Punjab official fined Rs.20250 for delaying info under RTI

GURPREET SINGH MEHAK Wednesday, 10 October 2007


FATEHGARH SAHIB: The Punjab State Information Commission has fined an Executive Officer of Rs 20,250 for not providing information under Right to Information Act.


Information commissioners R.K. Gupta and P.P.S. Gill imposed fine on Sukhdev Singh, Executive Officer, Municipal Council, Rampura Phul in Bathinda district. Bathinda Deputy Commissioner has been asked to recover the amount from the EO’s salary in four equal monthly equal installments and report compliance on Monday of third week of February, 2008.


The case relates to information sought by a lawyer Amandeep Goyal, a resident of Rampura Phul. It was observed by the information commissioners that the complainant has asked for a photocopy of the gazette notification issued by the Punjab Government. It has taken four months for the department in supplying of such a simple information. This does not speak well of the respondent-department. It is also seen that the present incumbent Sukhdev Singh, EO, Municipal Council, Rampura Phul who joined the department on July 3, 2007 has not bothered to appear in person or to deputy any body before the Commission on July 13, August 6 and September 3.


The EO finally appeared before the Information Commission on October 1. The Commission took serious view of such negligence on his part and he is, accordingly, fined at the rate of Rs.250 per day from July 13, 2007 to October 1, 2007 subject to a maximum of Rs.25,000 . The commission observed that as far as supply of information is concerned, the case stands disposed of. Now the EO will have to deposit Rs 20,250 as fine for 81 days at the rate of Rs 250 per day.


PunjabNewsline.com - Punjab official fined Rs.20250 for delaying info under RTI

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • Shree Vathsan
      By Shree Vathsan
      I had sought details of loan and copies of agreement entered with World Bank, JICA etc. of IT Expressway Chennai (created in partnership with Govt of TN) However the PIO has replied that they have moved out of world bank loan and taken loan from other banks details of which cannot be disclosed under 8(1) d of RTI Act citing "commercial confidence".
      However the IT Expressway is a public limited company having entered into agreement with Govt of TN and others for developing and maintaining a particular stretch of road.
      Kindly help me frame a good first appeal.
      Sent from my SM-J510FN using RTI INDIA mobile app
    • shrivar1212
      By shrivar1212
      I require help on co-operative issue. I had filed the RTI with the PIO, Dy registrar of co-op societies seeking information on affairs of society.
      The PIO has replied stating that the information I am seeking is available with co-operative society. My query is:
      1] Can PIO direct an applicant to private body for information?
      2] The society in question comes under the jurisdiction of the PIO, since PIO is public authority and co-operative society a private body, is it not duty of PIO to seek information from society and give it to me? How can PIO direct me back to society? This is RTI application, either I have to appeal or I have to forego. I cannot complaint against reply. So I want to approach FAA, under what grounds can I?
      3] What kind of violation PIO has committed by directing me back to private society? 
      4] Does co-operative society come under the purview of RTI ACt?
      Your views are appreciated. I am fighting lone battle with corrupt system. 


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy