Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Shrawan

      Bookmark your favourites   03/14/2018

      Bookmarks is an easy and convenient way to save and bookmark content that you want to find later: Want to save a long topic for later reading? Don't want to lose your spot in an interesting topic? Need to mark something for moderator review?   Curious about other people's favorite bookmarks?   Bookmarks at RTI INDIA saves you the hassle of rummaging through multiple pages, searching, and navigating to find that one post you wanted to later review. With one click, you can save any post as a bookmark.  It offers a convenient way to compile, store, and organize your most favorite posts from around the community into your own set of bookmarks. This is especially helpful for those helping others, so they can refer those important posts, blog, page, thread and post it in the new thread they are replying. FEATURES Bookmarks offers the following features: Public Bookmarks - Public bookmarks are viewable by other members and guests on a tab on the member's profile page.   Private Bookmarks - Private bookmarks are viewed only by yourself.  This is perfect for the posts you secretly love to return to!   Unlimited Bookmarks - Let your users save as many bookmarks as they want!   Notifications - The content creator can get a notification when somebody bookmarks his content Bookmarks works with the following content items: Topic Posts Blog Entries Blog Comments Download Files Download Comments Gallery Images Gallery Comments Gallery Albums New Articles FAST & FRIENDLY Bookmarks is designed to be super fast and user-friendly.  You can add or remove the bookmark, the bookmark is instantly removed without reloading the page - giving an instant and seamless transition to you. Some Screenshots
Sign in to follow this  

Receipt and Dispatch for RTI cases to be clearly defined in office

Recommended Posts



Appeal No. CIC/WB/A/2006/00342 dated 5/5/’06


Right to Information Act 2005 – Section 19

  • Appellant: Shri Jai Kumar Jain
  • Respondent: Delhi Development Authority



Applicant Shri Jai Kumar Jain, Joint Secretary, DDA Market Association,

Rohini, Delhi made an application on 16.2.06 to PIO Shri Pankaj Kumar, Jt.

Director (Lands), DDA seeking the following information:

  1. Photocopy of page Nos. 10 to 29 and from page No. 56 to date of File No. F-93(234)2000/CE
  2. Is there any difference between Built up property and property constructed on plot purchased from DDA. If so what and why.
  3. How many shops are lying vacant in each of scheduled caste and unreserved category in CSC No. 2, Sector 2, Rohini. Why allotment of vacant shops for scheduled castes is not being made or tender issued.
  4. For how many years tender for shops meant for scheduled caste in CSC No 2 Sector No. 2 has not been issued.
  5. In how much time the dispute in property Dep’t. of DDA is settled by the DDA. If not settled, then what action is taken by DDA.
  6. DDA is supposed to issue reply in respect of property cases within 15 days. But some officers of various Depts. do not reply in time. In such cases whether any action is to be taken by Senior Officers or not.

On not receiving any response, applicant made an appeal on 16.3.06 to the

Appellate Authority and on still not receiving a response he has appealed before this Commission.

The matter was heard on 15.9.06. The following are present:-

1. Shri Jai Kumar Jain

2. Shri Yash Pal Garg, Dir (CL)

3. Shri Bharat Mehta, Dy. Dir. (CE)

4 Shri Pankaj Kumar, Dy. Dir. (CL) 2




It stands established that the information sought vide application of 16.2.06

has been agreed to be provided by the Commercial Lands Department of DDA only on Sept. 7, 2006. The issues, therefore, are two:-

  • Fixing of a specific time schedule for allowing appellant Shri Jai Kumar Jain to inspect the files and take photocopies of the required notings, and
  • whether penalty will lie u/s 20(1) of failure to supply the information for the above period.

In regard to (1) above, Shri Yash Pal Garg, Director, Commercial Lands and PIO has agreed to dispatch photo copies of the concerned file notings by speed post to appellant Shri Jai Kumar Jain at his postal address: Shop No. 3, CSC No. 2, Sector-2, Rohini, New Delhi on 18.9.2006. Photocopy of the dispatch receipt will be submitted to this Commission on that date for inclusion in the record.

Regarding (2) above, it seems that Shri Bharat Mehta, Dy Director (C.E.)

had in fact responded to the application indicating that the required information could not be supplied under clause 8(1)(j) and 2.2 of the RTI Act. Both grounds are fallacious and would not have stood the first appeal. As discussed above, appellant Shri Jai Kumar Jain states that he had in fact filed the first appeal on 16.3.06, a copy of which was also submitted vide his second appeal. However, the date entered in the copy of our files is 16.2.06, which is obviously not possible since the original application was made on that date. It is this copy of our record, which was sent in the appeal notice to the PIO, who, therefore, has been unable to respond as to what became of the appeal.


Now that PIO Shri Yash Pal Garg has agreed to provide the information

sought by appellant Shri Jai Kumar Jain and appellant has in fact already filed first appeal to which there has been no response for reasons not known, no purpose will be served by directing Shri Jai Kumar Jain to again file first appeal. PIO Shri Yash Pal Garg is instead directed to enquire into what became of the first appeal, and if received, what action was taken thereon, within 15 working days of the 3 issue of this order, and if received, fixing responsibility for the appeal not having been entertained.


From the above case, it is clear that there has been confusion both in

receipt and dispatch of correspondence concerning RTI on the part of the Commercial Land Branch of DDA. It is admitted that in the early stages there was some confusion in the handling of applications received under the new Act. The situation has improved over the past months but Commercial Land Branch is cautioned to ensure that in future no such confusion, as demonstrated in this case, reoccurs. Because of this, it is not possible for us to identify the person specifically responsible for the delay in providing information on the application by Shri Jai Kumar Jain with the Department having been convinced that they have supplied the information asked for vide their lett er dated 13.3.06 while appellant convinced that his application or his appeal has been ignored.


The matter is disposed of accordingly.


Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.


(Wajahat Habibullah)

Chief Information Commissioner


Download the Decision from Download Segment

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

  • Files

  • Blog Entries

  • Similar Content

    • By jayeshwagh
      Dear Members,
      For the past few month I have been trying to get some information through https://rtionline.maharashtra.gov.in from the Maharashtra State and Dhule city administration regarding Sewage system of Dhule City. 
      The request to the Collector office was forwarded to the Pollution Control Board. No reply was received from the board.
      The request to the Municipal Corporation, Dhule received a reply to contact Water Supply and Sanitation Department, Maharashtra (WSSD).
      The request to WSSD was forwarded to Urban Development Department, Maharashtra (UDD).
      Today I received a reply from UDD that the request has been forwarded to Municipal Corporation, Dhule
      I have attached the list of questions asked and replies received from all the departments.
      Request you to please suggest future course of action. 
    • Guest Ravi Goswami
      By Guest Ravi Goswami
      In Gujarat, at Ahmedabad fake Doctors doing very wrong practice and they play with poor people's life and making money. They have no ragisterd equivalent degree.
      And also they are daily drunk in Hospital and doing very bad activities and also doing Physical harrasment with Poor women.Police does not taking any action. Police take money from there all time. I want to strict action against to this scam.
      Sent from my A1601 using RTI INDIA mobile app
    • By ashakantasharma
      International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention
      ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714
      www.ijhssi.org Volume 2 Issue 2 ǁ March. 2013ǁ PP.11-22
      Since came into force on 15th June, 2005 Right to Information act has been successfully working in most of the Indian states. The act is enacted by the state government of Tamilnadu (1997), Rajasthan (2000), Delhi (2001), Maharashtra (2002), Karnataka (2002), Assam (2002), Madhya Pradesh (2003), and Jammu & Kashmir (2004). Research studies shows that in their operation area the Right to Information act has been facing many severe challenges.
      These are as follows:-
      (a) Low level of awareness among people is the major challenge before successful implementation of Right to Information act. People, particularly in remote areas are not concerned with the Right to Information act. The research studies observe that the major sources of awareness are - (1) Mass media like- television channels, newspapers, magazines, journals etc. (2) Word of mouth. The nodal agency specifically the state government has not taken any potential step to promote Right to Information act.
      (b) Illiteracy and poverty is another major challenge before successful implementation of Right to Information act. Right to Information act has does not have any meaning for a Persons who does not have enough money to live, who is not educated and who does not have freedom. In fact, their first requirement is the right to live (right to eat, right to work and right to shelter) and then Right to Information.
      (c) Most of the uneducated even educated peoples do not have the proper knowledge about public Information officers, the procedure of paying fees and to get information.
      (d) Non-availability of user guide is another main challenge before successful RTI act implementation. Absence of user guide creates difficulty on the part of the Information seekers to gather knowledge about the process for submitting a RTI request.
      (e) Lack of commitment in efficient record management both state and central government instructions posing challenge before successful implementation of RTI act.
      (f) Due to the lack of efficient record management system, the public Information Officers face difficulty to get accurate and easy access of information from the concerned department, so that it can be provided to information seekers.
      (g) The non-cooperation from the part of bureaucracy is another major hurdle before RTI act implementation in India. The ―Babu type mentality (colonial mindset) makes them to use information as their own prerogative. Sometimes for their vested interest or to show their superiority, the bureaucrats do not want to disclose the basic information to citizens.
      (h) Bureaucracy also hides information for fear of criticism and to give a good image of them before public.
      (i) Lack of effective coordination and cooperation among state information commissioners and the non cooperation of departments with PIO hinder the process of smooth implementation of RTI act.
      (j) Lack of monitoring and review mechanism also hampers in successful implementation of RTI act in India.
      (k) The limited use of technology has hindered effective implementation of RTI act. Except in a few states no effective IT system have been establish to monitor and report on the disposal of application by public authorities.
      (l) The implementation of RTI act is uneven. It is not equally implemented to all the states. Therefore, awareness level also differs from state to state. In states like Arunachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Punjab the awareness level about RTI act is high, on the other hand awareness of people in Gujrat, Madhyapradesh, Jharkhand and UP is not high. Moreover different rules for different states especially on fees and costs make the RTI filing ineffective.
      (m) Generally, it is observed that retired bureaucrats are being appointed for the post of highest level of RTI officials i.e. the information commission at the central and state levels. These commissions are the independent of the government. Activists are of the opinion that these officials often show sympathetic attitude towards their fellow babus.
      (n) Non-availability of basic infrastructure is another serious hurdle before RTI implementation. The smooth implementation of RTI act requires the Public Information Officers (PIO) to provide information to the applicant through photocopies, soft copies etc. Though these facilities are easily accessible at districts level, but it is a challenge to get information form the block/Panchayat level. PIO claims that lack of infrastructure blockade RTI implementation at block level.
      Recommendations/Suggestions for effective implementation of RTI act-
      (a) As stated above due to ignorance, most of people have not heard about RTI act. To tackle this issue government should allocate huge fund for publicity budget of RTI act. However, this fund should be spent through central Information commission.
      (b) Publicity is very essential for RTI implementation. NGO‘s and civil society groups can take initiative to make massive awareness campaign to educate citizen about RTI act. This awareness programme may be at national, state and block level. Before making awareness programmes, the NGO‘s and CSC groups must identify the target i.e. vulnerable categories of citizens specifically- women, farmers and families, middle and working class. In this regard media and newspaper can play an effective role.
      (c) Children are considered resources for the future health of a nation. Therefore, RTI act should be added in the school syllabus to arouse curiosity of children about RTI at the grass-root level.
      (d) As the nodal administrative authority at the district level, every deputy commissioner and district collectors must be given responsibility of monitoring and implementation of RTI act by various departmental authorities within the respective district.
      (e) State Administrative Training institute can organize appropriate training intervention for the stakeholders.
      (f) There should be efficient and scientific record keeping agency so that applicants can get accurate information. Without modernizing and digitizing management of information and record providing information would take several days often exceeding the legal deadlines. 
      (g) Government departments should be entrusted responsibility to make the implementation of RTI easy for applicants seeking information rather than tough procedures.
      (h) Inculcation of political will is necessary for judicious working of RTI act. The Bureaucrats must come forward to help the aggrieved citizens.
      (i) It is the moral responsibility of the government to protect RTI activists and users and to take legal action against the attackers.
      (j) There is also need strong and robust monitoring and evaluation system. It will help periodically review implementation of the law and provide feedback to government agencies to address the shortcomings.
      (k) There should be proper coordination among state information commissioner and departments for the effective implementation of RTI act.
      (l) It is a recognized fact that for enabling and effective implementation of RTI act, the central and state information commissions need to strengthen their technical and IT capability.
      (m) Fast action to be taken to integrate different websites of all information commissions through a common IT gateway or national portal on RTI. This will prove to be grateful to common citizens.
      (n) Chief information commissioners should have frequent interaction with all information commissioners so that approach of all information commissioners may be similar in dealing with appeals/complaints before them.
      (o) According to the act it is mandatory to provide the information in the given time frame of 30 days. Since the information system is not integrated, therefore it becomes difficult to provide information in the given time. Moreover, many departments could not prepare themselves to respond according to the act.
      (p) Exemption provides under section 24 to the security and intelligence agencies are irrational and contrary to national interest. This exemption should be removed not by amendment of the act but by withdrawing the list of notified agencies in the 2nd schedule of the RTI act.
      (q) Training of officials of all departments and representatives of public authorities is essentially required so that they are made aware of their duties and obligations under the act.
      (r) Government of India should set up a National RTI council, which has members, people from various states, so that problems in implementation the RTI can be monitored regularly.
      (s) Last but not the least, political influence may anomalies in the functions of high level officials, so they have to maintain integrity by ignoring the vested interest.
      Thus it can be rightly mentioned that Right to Information act is an agent of good governance. It makes
      administration more accountable to the people. It makes people aware of administration and gives them an opportunity to take part in decision making process. It promoted democratic ideology by promoting openness and transparency in the administration. It reduces the chances of corruption and abuse of authority by public servants. Since the act is prepared for people‘s interest, hence it success also depends on how they exercise the act. Moreover, there is need active participation from people, NGO‘s, civil society groups, coordination among RTI officials, integrity among government departments and political will from government and elected leaders.
    • By ashakantasharma
      Which was the first country in the world to adopt a law giving individuals the right to access
      information held by public bodies?
    • By ashakantasharma
      Our Rights to Information was also recognized by the Supreme Court of India four decades ago in State of UP v/s Raj Narain AIR 1975 SC 865 by Justice K K Mathew in the following words-
      “In a government….where all the agents of the public must be responsible for their conduct, there can be but few secrets. The people….have a right to know every public act, everything that is done in a public way….. The responsibility of officials to explain or to justify their acts is the chief safeguard against oppression and corruption.”
    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
    • Total Members
    • Most Online
      02/21/2018 03:26 AM

    Newest Member
    manu naik
    Joined 03/22/2018 10:02 AM

Our Moderators

karira karira Super Moderator
ganpat1956 ganpat1956 Super Moderator
ambrish.p ambrish.p Moderators
Sunil Ahya Sunil Ahya Moderators
jps50 jps50 Moderators

About Us

RTI INDIA established in the year 2006, attracts a broad audience of citizens, experts, professionals and Government Officers interested in the latest development in the field of Right to Information. We also boast an active community focused on helping citizens to File RTI, First Appeal and Second Appeals. Our download section contains many sample RTI forms for everybody to use.

Social Links


Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy