Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
ganpat1956

Distressing news from Tamilnadu

Recommended Posts

ganpat1956

A 67-year old consumer activist from Salem was assaulted by some persons for seeking information under RTI Act.(Reported in "the Hindu" dt 01.12.2006)

 

Mr A Annamalai of FEDCOT sought information under RTI Act about the waiver of loans by a cooperative society in his village. Following this, he was abused and attacked in front of his house.

 

Following a complaint by one of the assailants, Mr Annamalai, a one-time Bhoodhan Movement leader, was taken to the police station and and made to sit on the floor in a corner. He was also abused and treated like a criminal.

 

The police, instead of taking action against the asailants, obtained a commitment from him in writing that he would not file similar petitions in future.

 

=====

 

Only last week, the office of another veteran consumer activist, "Traffic Ramaswamy", was ransacked in Chennai, following which, the Madras High Court has ordered a gun-man security for him. Mr Ramaswamy has filed a number of Public Interest Litigations in Madras High Court (This incident along with an interview was telecast in NDTV on 30.11.2006).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shrawan

This is really bad and immediate steps should be taken to protect Information Seekers. If the atmosphere of RTI is maligned by these activities, it is bound to generate apathy towards the good Law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
maneesh

It a bad precedence should be stopped. I believe nothing can stop an idea whoes time has come.

RTI is one such idea. It will grow stronger with these things rather than getting weak. This all shows that it has been effective in ensuring people discharge there function.

Long live the class of the people like Mr A Annamalai

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
brijeshbhatt

This shows how common man is being opressed and deprived of his rights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MOHANDAS

In T.N so many Govt. Departments/P.A sought exemption from the RTI Act 2005 and the Govt. very gracefully allowed this also in a very liberaly way. From that step we can assess the plight of genuine information seekers in T.N. No wonder all these things are happening under the noose of an elected Govt. and the SIC has become a mute spectator.

 

It is high time that the public should think and vote. Who will bell the Cat ? I am feeling sorry for the plight of those genuine RTI applicants in Tamil Nadue.

 

 

Mohandas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • Shree Vathsan
      By Shree Vathsan
      Can the General Diary of the police station where particulars of "All the details in r/o criminals arrested and entry of arrival/departure of all enrolled police officers on duty with nature of their duties, duty performed and places visited etc."   are maintained be inspected and photo copies sought from a particular police station under RTI?
      Is there any particular clause/section that needs to be quoted for inspection under RTI? Any format available for inspection under RTI?
    • Shree Vathsan
      By Shree Vathsan
      The person in the article below is me. I had a corporation official visit my house with the RTI and asking for my whereabouts. However the PIO has sent a reply on 8/5/19  stating that AE Div 170 is the person responsible for inspecting the banners on the particular stretch. It is after finalising this reply that I had got a call from AE Div 170 on 8/5/19 evening and a person visited my house on 9/5/19. The reply sent by PIO dated 8/5/19 was received on 11/5/19.
      Further The AE has stated that he has inspected the stretch and removed illegal banners immediately. However I have material evidence that the banners remained in the same place from afternoon till late night. Only the persons who kept the banner had removed them. So can I penalise the PIO for providing false and incorrect information. 
       

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy