Jump to content
vashisthvivek

The o/o Advocate General directed to re-designate PIO and AA

Recommended Posts

vashisthvivek

The office of the Advocate General, Himachal Pradesh has been directed by the Himachal Pradesh Information Commission to redesignate the PIO and the Appellate Authority as per the provision of the RTI Act. The details of the case are that and application filed for information under RTI with the PIO in the o/o of the Advocate General, Himachal Pradesh. The Deputy Advocate General, Himachal Pradesh was acting as PIO. The requisite information was not supplied with the specified time of 30 days. Therefore, the applicant decided to file first appeal. But he was surprised to find out that the other Deputy Advocate General was designated as AA. Sine the AA should be senior in rank to the PIO, therefore, designating other officer of the same rank as AA was not sustainable as per the provisions of the Act. Therefore, the applicant instead of filing first appeal with the AA directly filed appeal with the SIC and also challenged the designation of the D.A.G as AA. The SIC in its order dated 17.08.2007 in appeal No. 46/2007-08 upheld the view of the applicant and not only directed to redesignate the PIO and the AA, but also directed the office of Advocate General to provide the requisite information within a period of 15 days. The SIC further directed the PA to refund the amount deposited by the applicant for obtaining the information.

Now, the biggest point is that when thehighest law knowing office (o/o Advocate General) is not able to interpret the law properly, what will be the position of other P.A.s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rama Sharma

It's really unfortunate that the office like that of AG, which acts as highest office for advising Government on law realted matters has not the knowlege of RTI provisions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
karira
It's really unfortunate that the office like that of AG, which acts as highest office for advising Government on law realted matters has not the knowlege of RTI provisions

 

Rama,

 

Nothing is "unfortunate" in such situations, it is "deliberate".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • nk agarwal
      By nk agarwal
      A RTI Application has been replied by an officer signing for PIO. To my understanding it is only the PIO who has to reply under his signature and name.
      My application and reply copy attached



    • senthil
      By senthil
      Can the Information officer instead of furnishing information direct the applicant to appraoch some other authority insted of himself securing and supplying information from such authority?

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy