DDA, Delhi Police top list of RTI queries in capital
AS reported in Economic Times, Jun, 2008, 1109 hrs IST, IANS
NEW DELHI: People in the capital seem to be most unhappy with the ways
of the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and Delhi Police, if the
number of applications made under the Right to Information (RTI) Act
is any indication.
According to figures compiled by Kabir, an NGO working on RTI, the
capital's land management agency received 12,970 RTI applications from
October 2005 to December 2007 and Delhi Police 12,229 during the same
"We filed RTI applications in various departments of Delhi to
understand the growth and trend of the RTI Act in the national capital
since it was notified in 2005," Neeraj Kumar, who works with Kabir,
"Delhi Police and DDA received maximum applications, which clearly
implies that people face maximum problems at these places," he said.
The other top government bodies in Delhi that received a large number
of RTI applications are the education department (4,175), the food
supplies and consumer affairs department (2,535), the Delhi Jal Board
(1,698) and the office of the commissioner of industries (1,496).
"The process of getting this data was not smooth at all. Several
departments didn't give us any data and we have filed a first appeal.
We are still pursuing those applications," Kumar added.
As far as the lowest number of RTI applications is concerned, the chit
fund department got only 13 applications. Other departments receiving
fewer applications are planning (17), archaeology (25), Home Guards
and civil defence (34) and public works department (57), the data
According to the RTI Act, if an applicant does not get the required
information, he or she can file a first appeal in the same department
with a senior official. However, if he is not satisfied with that
reply, he can file a second appeal at the Information Commission.
In cases that needed first appeals, Delhi Police topped the list.
"Delhi Police received the highest number of first appeals at 1,177
followed by the education department (447), Delhi Jal Board (260), DDA
(258), the department of training and technical education (251) and
the transport department (122)," said Kumar.
Delhi Police were again leading the list of cases where second appeals
The number of second appeals filed against Delhi Police, DDA, the
education department, the department of training and technical
education, Delhi Jal Board and the food supplies and consumer affairs
department are respectively 135, 81, 59, 45, 20 and 14.
"We analysed the data and found that departments like Delhi Police,
DDA, the education department and Jal Board are those where a common
man in Delhi faces maximum problems," said Kumar.
On data regarding RTI applications before the Municipal Corporation of
Delhi, Kumar said: "We have received some data from MCD and a part is
awaited. It is huge and will take a lot of time in compilation."
DDA, Delhi Police top list of RTI queries in capital- Politics/Nation-News-The Economic Times
As reposted in zeenews.com
CIC pulls up MCD for not responding to notice, summons
New Delhi, July 22: The Central Information Commission (CIC) has pulled up the MCD for not responding to a notice issued to it over a petition seeking details on appointments made in the civic agency on compassionate grounds.
"This Commission takes an adverse view of the MCD failing to respond both to our appeal notice and summons for appearance in hearing," Central Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah said.
The Commission has decided to proceed with the hearing of a case without the presence of MCD officials.
It's observation came while hearing a petition filed by Mahinder Kaur of Haryana seeking information on MCD employees who were appointed on the compassionate grounds.
She said that the full information has not been provided to her by MCD.
The Commission directed the MCD to give the petitioner information pertaining to appointments made on compassionate grounds along with the criteria adopted in the process.
The CIC also ordered the MCD to upload the information sought on its website and kept it up-to-date every time such an appointment is made.
It asked the MCD to complete its updation within a period of 20 days.
The Commissioner ordered the Health Officer of the MCD to explain the delay in furnishing the information and asked why a penalty of Rs 8,000 should not imposed on him.