Jump to content
News Ticker

Time now to enforce RTI: CIC

Recommended Posts


JODHPUR: The effectiveness of the country's 18-month-old path-breaking transparency legislation, the Right to Information Act, came under review for two days ata workshop on RTI over the weekend in the Sun City of Jodhpur.


There were complaints of lack of interest on the part of State Governments in creating the necessary infrastructure for disseminating the information under the Act but the speakers -- who included Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah and pioneer of the movement Aruna Roy and CICs of Andhra Pradesh and Rajasthan -- hailed the new law as one of the "outstanding legislations" in the world and "unprecedented" in the country going by the public response.


Even while cautioning the public against assuming that the new law would act as a "jadui chhadi" (magic wand) to solve all the problems, Mr. Habibullah conceded that enough time had been given for the system to get attuned to the provisions of the new law. "The period training has ended. Now for denial of, or for delay in, providing information there should be a serious reason; otherwise penal action will have to be initiated," he said.


The time was up not for the country's adamant bureaucracy alone. "It had been a training period for all of us. Now we have to move forward and give people what is theirs by right," Mr. Habibulah said. "This is an Act the people have accepted and adopted as theirs."


"No better law could have been possible to curb corruption in the country," noted Congress general secretary Ashok Gehlot, convener of Bharat Sewa Sansthan.


The workshop, meant to train youth in RTI and NREGA, was the first public programme at the newly inaugurated Rajv Gandhi Sewa Sadan premises of the Bharat Sewa Sansthan.


"It is for the Governments to spread awareness on the application of the legislation. A certain amount could be earmarked for educating the public on the law," Mr. Gehlot suggested. He expressed happiness over the passage of the State level Right to Information Act in 2002 when he was the Chief Minister of Rajasthan.


"Unless the penalty factor is not put into use the information will not come out," said Aruna Roy, whose Rajasthan-based Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan pioneered the public movement for the law. "Punish three; three thousand will fall in line," she said.


Even after the legislation many officers continued to deny information to the seekers, she noted. "We need to put pressure on the State CICs to truthfully implement the Act," she added, pointing out that the offices of the State Commissions, including that of Rajasthan were forced to function under limited resources. Ms. Roy suggested a bold stance from the CICs. "The Commissioners should not be cowed down by the Government in power," she said.

Giving an update on the law and its implementation, Nikhil Dey of the MKSS said there had been "tremendous input from the people" on the Act in the first year of its being.


(The Hindu, Dec.19,2006-online edition)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • Shree Vathsan
      By Shree Vathsan
      Can the General Diary of the police station where particulars of "All the details in r/o criminals arrested and entry of arrival/departure of all enrolled police officers on duty with nature of their duties, duty performed and places visited etc."   are maintained be inspected and photo copies sought from a particular police station under RTI?
      Is there any particular clause/section that needs to be quoted for inspection under RTI? Any format available for inspection under RTI?
    • Shree Vathsan
      By Shree Vathsan
      The person in the article below is me. I had a corporation official visit my house with the RTI and asking for my whereabouts. However the PIO has sent a reply on 8/5/19  stating that AE Div 170 is the person responsible for inspecting the banners on the particular stretch. It is after finalising this reply that I had got a call from AE Div 170 on 8/5/19 evening and a person visited my house on 9/5/19. The reply sent by PIO dated 8/5/19 was received on 11/5/19.
      Further The AE has stated that he has inspected the stretch and removed illegal banners immediately. However I have material evidence that the banners remained in the same place from afternoon till late night. Only the persons who kept the banner had removed them. So can I penalise the PIO for providing false and incorrect information. 


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy