Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
venufightsforjustice

RTI in reference to cases pending in courts

Recommended Posts

venufightsforjustice

Is it possible to get information under RTI when some cases are pending in courts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wagh7

venu ji,

 

If the matter is in the courts, and you are asking information related to those cases, I think it comes under exemption.

 

rakatkam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
venufightsforjustice

Thanks for your reply Sir,

 

If I can add up to my earlier question, I would like to explain a typical example.

 

A Government Finance Corporation funds a project to a private body and the beneficiary becomes a defaulter. Naturally, the Corporation takes up the matter with the appropriate courts. The cases might be continuing for sometime. However, I did not mean the information regarding the details of the cases pending against the defaulting private body.

 

I am interested to know, if I can ask certain information about the Loan agreement with the Corporation and the private body. I am anxious to know if the Private body has, apart from defaulting, violated any terms, clauses and contions of the loan agreement.

 

I will be glad if you can guide me about the implications of the RTI in such cases. Will it be still subjudice to reveal any information?

 

Thanking you for your prompt answer.

 

Namaste

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Satish Gupta

Dear Venuji:

 

The fact that the Government Finance Corporation has files a case in court, against the defaulting body, has no effect on GFC's obligations under RTI.

 

So if GFC is required to release information under RTI, it must do so, even if GFC is fighting a case in court, about the same project or information.

 

Moreover practically all the papers filed in courts, are in public domain. GFC should provide a copy to anyone who requests these papers, under RTI. The loan agreement is an essential document in the court filings. If you request the court filings you should be able to get the loan agreement.

 

Whether the terms of loan agreement were violated or not, is a different issue. Under RTI, GFC does not have to conduct an investigation or give you their opinion.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
divyachakshu

you will know it very soon enough. let the fuss over sc v. cic at high cout settle down.

 

however, yes you will receive an info that you already know viz. so many hearings have been done and the next one is schedeuled on so & so date.

i will probe this issue and inform youasap

regards

divyachakshu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
divyachakshu

you will know it very soon enough. let the fuss over sc v. cic at high cout settle down.

 

however, yes you will receive an info that you already know viz. so many hearings have been done and the next one is schedeuled on so & so date.

i will probe this issue and inform youasap

regards

divyachakshu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
divyachakshu

tribunals, as against regular legal courts, are quasi judicial body.

what separates it from others is an otherwise excluded clause found nowhere else in judiciary and it states that

 

no complaint against procedure of these bodies before any law court can be challenged that the procedure of 'principles of justice i.e. natural justice' have not been adhered to.

2 questions

 

1. do u consider it morally correct?

2. with respect to RTI act of 2005, do you think it directly affects your right to info as with having info too, you can not do anything as per the clause above?

3. according to you such clauses interefere with democratic principles and affect all of us?

4. how do you suggest to rectify it (if u think it is improper) or how it can be implemented without affecting peoples' rti (if u think the clause is appropriate) .

 

PS : FRIENDS INTERESTING IN PERSUING THIS ISSUE FURTHER ARE WELCOME

REGARDS

 

DIVYACHAKSHU

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
divyachakshu

tribunals, as against regular legal courts, are quasi judicial body.

what separates it from others is an otherwise excluded clause found nowhere else in judiciary and it states that

 

no complaint against procedure of these bodies before any law court can be challenged that the procedure of 'principles of justice i.e. natural justice' have not been adhered to.

2 questions

 

1. do u consider it morally correct?

2. with respect to RTI act of 2005, do you think it directly affects your right to info as with having info too, you can not do anything as per the clause above?

3. according to you such clauses interefere with democratic principles and affect all of us?

4. how do you suggest to rectify it (if u think it is improper) or how it can be implemented without affecting peoples' rti (if u think the clause is appropriate) .

 

PS : FRIENDS INTERESTING IN PERSUING THIS ISSUE FURTHER ARE WELCOME

REGARDS

 

DIVYACHAKSHU

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sngupta

I want to know the meaning of subjudice and where some details of subjudice is available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sngupta

I want to know the meaning of subjudice and where some details of subjudice is available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
taurus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In law, sub judice, Latin for "under judgment," means that a particular case or matter is currently under trial or being considered by a judge or court. The term may be used synonymously with "the present case" or "the case at bar" by some lawyers.

 

In England and Wales, New Zealand, Australia, India, Pakistan and Canada it is generally considered inappropriate to comment publicly on cases sub judice, which can be an offence in itself, leading to contempt of court proceedings. This is particularly true in criminal cases, where publicly discussing cases sub judice may constitute interference with due process.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
taurus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In law, sub judice, Latin for "under judgment," means that a particular case or matter is currently under trial or being considered by a judge or court. The term may be used synonymously with "the present case" or "the case at bar" by some lawyers.

 

In England and Wales, New Zealand, Australia, India, Pakistan and Canada it is generally considered inappropriate to comment publicly on cases sub judice, which can be an offence in itself, leading to contempt of court proceedings. This is particularly true in criminal cases, where publicly discussing cases sub judice may constitute interference with due process.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • Shrawan
      By Shrawan
      Central Information Commission



      Decision No.285/IC(A)/2006
      F. No.CIC/MA/A/2006/00653
       
      Dated, the 20th September, 2006



      Name of the Appellant : Sh. Pradipta Dutta, B-141 Chittaranjan Park, New Delhi – 110 019
      Name of the Public Authority: Directorate of Income Tax (Legal & Research) (DIT), 3rd floor, Drumshaped Building, I.P.Estate, New Delhi- 110 002. DECISION
       
      Facts of the Case:
      The appellant had sought certain information in the form of queries, whichhave been duly responded by the CPIO and the appellate authority as well. Hehas however filed an appeal before the Commission against the reply of theappellate authority and prayed that the CPIO of DIT (L&R) be directed to furnishinformation with respect to his following queries:
      “Kindly inform why ITOs have been posted at DIT (L&R) even though there is no corresponding post in the same pay-scale at ITJSection, CBDT. What functions are the ITOs expected to discharge at DIT (L&R)?
      Kindly inform why ITOs at DIT (L&R) are being forced, under threat of disciplinary action, to perform the functions of an Asstt.Commissioner without being paid officiating pay.”
      Commission’s Decision:
       
      In its oft-repeated decisions, the Commission has advised the informationseekers that they ought not seek the views and comments of the CPIO on the questions asked by them. Yet, in the garb of seeking information mainly for redressal of their grievances, applications from requesters are filed. The CPIO’s in turn, have also ventured to answer them. Thus, the information seekers as providers have erred in interpreting the definition of information.
      A CPIO of any public authority is not expected to create and generate a fresh, an information because it has been sought by an appellant. The appellant is, therefore, advised to specify the required information, which may be provided, if it exists, in the form in which it is sought by him.
      The information sought relate to duties and responsibilities of ITOs deployed at different locations and the salary or compensation paid to them.Under Section 4(1) of the Act, all the public authorities are required to disclose such information as above. Had it been done by the respondent, the CPIO could have informed the applicant about the source where from he could have obtained the information. The need for filing application for information and this appeal could have thus been avoided. In pursuance of the principle of maximum disclosure, as u/s 4(1) of the Act, the CPIO is directed to disseminate the information so that in future, such applications are minimized.
      The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

      Sd/-
      (Prof. M.M. Ansari)
      Information Commissioner
      Download the Decision from Download segment.


       

    • crusader
      By crusader
      I want to know that I have got information from Nagar nigam, Can I use it as an evidence in the court of law? What are the provisions related to that?

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy