- NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
- shows RTI
- RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
- 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
- The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
- Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
- Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
I am a new member & my name is swami. Can I get the answers for the following queries:
1. Does the citizen of India can have access to the personal information (revenue details) of other citizen?
2. If the Citizen cannot access, then who has the right to access it?
3. Under what conditions govt authorities can access to personal information of the citizens of India?
It would be of great help if the above issues are explained with reference to a case law.
Please enlighten me on the above issues.
Thanks & Regards,
Who are the landowners who have been exempted from the Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Actâ€™s (ULCRA) land acquisition clauses that they build houses for â€˜the weaker sectionsâ€™ of society? What are the housing schemes that have come up as a result?
Member of non-governmental organisation National Alliance for Peoples Movements Simpreet Singh (27) has asked the government to give him these details about the controversial ULCRA lawâ€™s implementation under the Right to Information Act.
Under pressure from the Centre and the World Bank, the state government is set to repeal ULCRA in the upcoming legislative session.
The three-decade-old socialist land acquisition and housing measure was brought in during the Emergency by Indira Gandhiâ€™s government, placing a ceiling on owning land beyond 500 sq metre, and acquiring the â€˜excessâ€™ for public purposes, most notably low and middle-income housing. But if the officers are to be believed, the government doesnâ€™t have ready answers to the above questions.
Responding to Singh, the Public Information Officer (PIO) of Urban Development, V Jadhav dashed off a rejection, claiming â€œthe information is too voluminous to give.â€
The PIO at the Collectorate, S Dhaigude, went a step further and sent Simpreet a bill for Rs 16.27 lakh if he wanted the information.
Dhaigude told HT: "We have over 20,000 files. Each file contains upto six pages. Certified copies cost Rs 26 per page. Hence Rs 16.2 lakh. If the citizen has a problem, he can go and appeal."
Singh has now filed a complaint with the State Information Commision, where over 5,000 information appeals against the government are pending.
He believes the government is demanding the astronomical sum because it does not want to reveal the information since it will show up the non-implementation of the Act.
â€œI neither asked for entire files, not certified copies. I only want the list of landowner exemptions, and the names of the housing schemes where the land, which should otherwise have come to the government, has been used.â€
Singh pointed out that the government had informed the Bombay High Court that 1,800 acres - or 45 Nariman Points - of excess land in Mumbai had been exempted under ULCRA. â€œHow can they not know how this land was used if they have decided to repeal it?â€
Section 4 of the RTI Act also states that state departments should keep all their records catalogued and indexed to help citizens access information. But 15 months after the Act came into force, the Urban Development department, headed by Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh, is yet to do it.
Jadhav said, â€œWe do not have the time to do all this organising.â€
UD secretary Ramanand Tiwari said that charge was justified. â€œRTI prescribes a fee, and in this case the information has to be culled out,â€ he added.
But state Information Commissioner Suresh Joshi, who is yet to hear Singhâ€™s complaint, said the state wasnâ€™t implementing the sunshine law adequately.
â€œI met the Chief Minister and the Chief Secretary two weeks ago about the need for all departments to implement the suo moto disclosure clause and organise their records. Over a year has passed and we have a more refined sense now of what citizens want to know, so it should be done, especially with regard to policy matters.â€
He added the state had promised to convene a meeting of all secretaries to ensure their departments fall in line, and he would pursue the matter with the government.
The Hindustan Times - Indian Newspapers in English Language from three editions