Jump to content

Rejected in IAS due to disability

Recommended Posts

New Delhi: Admission to the Indian Administrative Services (IAS) is the dream of hundreds of thousands of Indians every year.


However, Kumar Avikal Manu's dream turned into a nightmare when after clearing the exam, he was rejected by an insensitive bureaucracy because of a partial disability in one hand.


The 30-year-old would have been a part of the elite civil services today as an officer of the Indian Revenue Service but fate, and an insensitive Government dealt him a cruel hand.


Avikal had cleared the UPSC exams in 2004 and in May 2005, he received a letter from the Department of Personnel and Training. The letter stated that he had cleared his civil services exams and was being considered.



But things took a turn for the worst when he did not hear a word from the Government after August 2005. He is still wondering what the 48 per cent disability in his right hand got to do with DOPT becoming mute.


"Because of this attempt of DOPT, I have suffered mental and psychological harassment, and loss of valuable time," says Avikal.


Gradually losing hope, Avikal approached the Central Information Commission (CIC) in October 2006.


In December last year, the CIC pulled up DOPT for its lackadaisical approach. But with the DOPT continuing to be silent on this case, the CIC is now contemplating even more serious action.


The commission now believes that this case is important and deserves a rare full-bench hearing.


Only half a dozen cases have been heard by a full bench so far. It can only mean that the CIC is now going to give the DOPT an earful.


"The matter has been referred to the full commission to give its own judgement on the issue," says Information Commissioner MM Ansari.


Interestingly, the DOPT is the nodal agency for the implementation of the RTI act and every effort to get in touch with the department and secure their version of the story has not yielded results.


There is no explanation why the DOPT is making this discrimination and this is not the first time when successful but physically challenged candidates have leveled such an allegation against the department.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe as per law all the citizen has equal opportunity. Parliament has enacted




in all fairness to ensure the rights of the disabled.


Lets hope with RTI this will be implemented in right spirit.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Friends,


I wonder why Vikal has been made to undergo all that. The following press-release of the Govt. of India that came some time in July 2007 speaks volumes of the efforts that are intended to be put in. Has any one got some update on the present scenario? Has Vikal got his due?


Here is the Press release:


Friday, April 27, 2007



To improve access and increase the representation of the physically challenged persons in the Civil Services under the central government, the government has decided that any physically challenged person, selected on the standards as applicable to the non-disabled candidate of his category, will be counted over and above the quota fixed for physically challenged persons. This would be exactly on the lines as it happens for SC/ST/OBC candidates.


It has also been decided that the physically challenged persons belonging to the General Category shall be eligible for seven attempts as against existing four attempts. The physically challenged persons belonging to the OBC Category and SC/ST category would continue to be eligible for seven and unlimited attempts respectively. Additional relaxation of 10 years in the upper age limit for physically challenged persons will be continued.


The Government has also decided that while reservation for the three categories of disability (visual impairment, hearing impairment and locomotor disability or cerebral palsy) shall be made separately, the interchange in the vacancies among the three categories would be possible in case of non-availability of persons of a specified category. A specially constituted Medical Board with experts in the area will examine physically challenged persons so that fair, consistent reports are available.


To ensure the full utilisation of quota for physically challenged persons, it has been decided to treat the backlogs with respect to physically challenged persons in the same way as backlogs for the SC/ST categories.


Union Public Service Commission will recommend physically challenged candidates after ensuring that they meet the prescribed eligibility criteria in terms of abilities/disabilities for identified services where vacancy exists. The eligibility for availing reservation against the quota for physically challenged persons would be the same as described in the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Specific eligibility criteria as set by the Government for identified services/posts would have to be met by physically disables candidates. The implementation of these decisions shall be with prospective effect.



Source: PIB Press Release



SC Vashishth

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The health ministry and UPSC are still insensitive to physically challenged. Here is an example quoted in DNIS:


Dr Satendra Singh, a disabled Assistant Professor of Physiology at the University College of Medical Sciences (U.C.M.S.), Delhi University, applied for the post of Assistant Professor (Physiology) in the Teaching Specialist Sub-cadre of Central Health Service. However, Dr Singh did not receive any interview call from U.P.S.C.

“It is not easy to gather information at U.P.S.C. desk-counters and one is allowed to talk only on their intercoms. When I contacted their recruitment cell, they told me that as I am a disabled person, I am not fit to apply for such posts,” informed Dr Singh.


This is not the first instance where a disabled person has been subjected to such “arbitrary” behaviour. “I explained that I am already working on the same post in U.C.M.S. and my disability is no hindrance. But, to this they said that U.P.S.C. is only a recruiting body and as per Health Ministry’s notification their hands are tied,” said Dr Singh.


On Dr Singh’s complaint, National Centre for Promotion of Employment for Disabled People (N.C.P.E.D.P.) investigated the matter and as suspected, it was found that the said post was not ‘identified’ even for people with orthopaedic disability!


N.C.P.E.D.P. then brought the matter to the urgent attention of the Health Ministry. Thanks to the speedy intervention made by Additional Secretary, Keshav Desiraju, the matter was resolved well within time.


A fax was sent by the Health Ministry to U.P.S.C. stating, “It has been decided that Dr Singh and other similarly placed candidates, if any, may be called for the interview. A detailed clarification in this regard will follow shortly”.


The sole responsibility for this episode rests on the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (M.S.J.E.). It is they who are responsible for this ugly business entitled “identification of jobs”. How many lives have been adversely impacted and how many disabled people have lost out on jobs and even promotions is anybody’s guess.


What is extremely surprising and distressing is that even the new draft law has not moved away from the concept of identification of jobs. As long as this concept stays, hundreds and thousands of discriminatory incidents like this one will continue to happen.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Files

  • Blog Entries

  • Similar Content

    • By rohitgoyal_asn
      Hi All,
      I have sent an application to Cuttack Municipal Corporation and they have rejected my application mentioning photo identity proof of the applicant is not attached. Are they allowed to do so???
      I wish to know that is it necessary to disclose the information of the applicant for filling an RTI application??
    • By karira
      SIC no to making service books of 164 officers public
      The Madhya Pradesh State Information Commission has quashed the order of first appellate officer in which it was directed topublic information officer to provide free of charge information of service books of 164 officers and employees. Generally, the citizens make second (final) appeal to the Commission against appellate officer and public information officer.
      In a rare case, a public information officer lodges second appeal against the appellate officer.The Commission in its hearing by its commissioner Atmadeep accepted the appeal and rejected the order of the first appellate officer. The rejection of the order will lead to a stop on making personal information public of more than 150 officers and employees along with principal of Govt. Kamlaraja Girls PG Autonomous College, Gwalior.
      Read More: SIC no to making service books of 164 officers public - Free Press Journal
    • By leo544
      Hello Sir,
      I filed an rti asking for some information regarding a newspaper article on encroachment of land.
      The questions are shown below
      1. Under section 2(f) of the RTI Act 2005, kindly provide information from records of your office about the day, date when encroachment came to the notice of the Tahsildar.
      2.Under section 2(f) of the RTI Act 2005, kindly provide information from records of your office about the the survey number, extent of land under encroachment.
      3.Under section 2(f) of the RTI Act 2005, kindly provide information from records of your office about the time period of encroachment and details of the encroacher.
      4.Under section 2(f) of the RTI Act 2005, kindly provide information from records of your office about the action taken against the encroacher.
      5.If the govt has evicted the encroacher and taken back the kunta(tank) land, please share me a copy of the detailed report mentioning that kunta (tank) land is taken back by govt from encroachers and public can freely enter into that land.
      I received reply stating that " your application is rejected,because there is no provision under rti to answer to the questions asked". Even though questions were asked,pio is simply rejecting.
      I asked the information from the records of the office about the date on which the encroachment came to the notice of the officer and details of the land under encroachment and details of the encroacher and action taken against encroachment.
      Actually the matter has come to the officials notice by the means of
      1. newspapers
      2. representations submitted by villagers so many times.
      3. inspection notes/reports by the field level staff, etc.,
      I think all the above mentioned documents comes under section 2(f). Are newspapers also comes under this?
      PIO should either provide info from the above mentioned records or he should tell that records are not availabe, instead HE REJECETED THE APPLICATION STATING QUESTIONS CANNOT B ANSWERED.
      I have decided to go for FAA, by highlighting the above mentioned points.
      So please help me in framing the grounds/reasons for the appeals.
      Thanks in advance
    • By anshuraju
      I am a scheduled caste student, my scholarship application is rejected just because High school passing year is mistakenly entered 2010 instead of 2008. But I have attached all relevant documents hard copy with my application. Is I am able to receive scholarship by any means after this. Thank you
    • By silverbullet
      Hello experts,
      I am from Tamilnadu, I have given for transfer of patta several months back, every time some one call from office and ask to come in person and then say it is pending in 'X' office or "Y's" office
      So i filed an RTI applicationto get to know details, ..
      I pasted 5 nos of 2 Rs Court stamp in the application next to the sender's address along with all the proof of applications for transfer of patta. They responded after 30 days saying the village and survey number is not clearly stated so we cannot reply to your questions
      Even though its clearly evident in initial application, I responded to their reply stating the survey number and village in words (This time since its a reply, there were no stamps affixed by me)
      After 30 days of my reply, i have received a response saying that your application is rejected since you did not attach the receipt of RS 10 court fees ! !
      Do i have to attach court fees stamp every time ?
      If the stamp was missing, the PIO should have stated that in his first reply right ? instead he said survey number and village is not clear !
      How do i proceed ?
      Kindly advice
    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
    • Total Members
    • Most Online
      02/21/2018 03:26 AM

    Newest Member
    শাহ্‌ মোঃ বোরহান
    Joined 04/21/2018 09:41 PM

Our Moderators

karira karira Super Moderator
ganpat1956 ganpat1956 Super Moderator
ambrish.p ambrish.p Moderators
Sunil Ahya Sunil Ahya Moderators
jps50 jps50 Moderators

About Us

RTI INDIA established in the year 2006, attracts a broad audience of citizens, experts, professionals and Government Officers interested in the latest development in the field of Right to Information. We also boast an active community focused on helping citizens to File RTI, First Appeal and Second Appeals. Our download section contains many sample RTI forms for everybody to use.

Social Links


Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy