- NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
- shows RTI
- RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
- 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
- The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
- Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
- Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
This topic is now closed to further replies.
My parents have been trying to get their names into the electoral rolls but inspite of having tried for three consecutive years, they have failed. I want to use RTI to know what are the essential documents actually needed and why their names were not included. Can I ask this information or this information not even recorded? To whom should this application made? If I want to pay by demand draft, in whose name should I draw it?
EC decision on plea under RTI questioned
"The proceedings are quasi-judicial"
NEW DELHI: The Election Commission's decision denying information regarding petitions filed against the Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee and other MPs in the office of profit cases has shocked the person who sought it under the Right to Information Act.
In its communication to Amit Sen Gupta, the Commission said it could not supply copies of documents like the petition submitted to the President through which the question of disqualification of MPs in the office of profit issue was raised.
Dr. Sen Gupta had sought a copy of the petition filed by Mukul Roy, general secretary of the All India Trinamool Congress, against Mr. Chatterjee, Mohammed Salim, Hannan Mollah, Nilotpal Basu, Tarid Baran Topdar and other Communist Party of India (Marxist) MPs. He wanted authenticated copies of all documents including the petition; records in this connection in possession of the Commission; and orders made by it.
Having filed it with the requisite fee under the Right to Information on March 27, Dr. Sen Gupta said he saw "no logic" in his request being rejected by the Commission on April 13 on the plea that in such cases it has to give its opinion to the President alone after conducting such enquiry as considered necessary. "The proceedings in such reference cases are quasi-judicial in nature." "What about transparency?" he said.
The Commission said that the copies of documents, decisions or pleadings related to such reference cases cannot be supplied until opinion was tendered and the President's order in the matter was published.
Dr. Sen Gupta said what was surprising was that he was denied information by the Commission that the Chief Election Commissioner otherwise shared in a press conference. He said the CEC had referred to Mr. Roy's petition as also the one against Rashtriya Lok Dal MP Anuradha Chowdhury from a Muzzafarnagar advocate.
In that, the CEC said adequate information needed to issue a notice was not there.
So it decided to ask the petitioner to furnish all these details to enable the Commission to proceed with the petition. Dr. Sen Gupta said he now planned to appeal against the Commission's decision.
The Hindu : National : EC decision on plea under RTI questioned