Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
Atul Patankar

PIO asks for application on prescribed form, reprimanded

Recommended Posts

Atul Patankar

As reported by Jasneet Bindra at indianexpress.com on January 8, 2010

 

Chandigarh : A PIO of the office of Director, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Punjab, got an earful from a Punjab State Information Commissioner for denying information to a retired employee of the department on the ground that his RTI application was not filed on a prescribed form. The case concerns retirement benefits of complainant Brij Lal Sharma of Barnala that have not been released by the Food and Civil Supplies Department as a case involving loss of wheat worth Rs 60,817 in 2002-03 was stated to be pending against him.

The complainant had filed an application under the RTI Act, asking for an attested copy of any notice, if it was issued, for this alleged shortage, and a copy of evidence showing that it was delivered to him.

The respondent wrote to the complainant, saying that he should file the application on the prescribed form and also send the amount required to be spent on photocopying the information and sending it by post.

Displeased over the response, SIC P K Verma said, “This reply of the respondent suffers from two defects. Firstly, it has been held by the commission in various cases that if an application is made on plain paper and application fee has also been sent, the information cannot be refused merely on the ground that the plea was not made on the prescribed form. Secondly, the amount required to be sent by the complainant as fee was not intimated to him. The complainant nevertheless sent Rs 100, after which the respondent directed the superintendent of the Shortage and Excess Branch to supply the information to the complainant, which has still not been done.”

While directing the respondent to ensure that copies of documents sought by the complainant are given, Verma said, “Supply of information has already been delayed. The respondent has also ignored the notice issued by the commission and is not present either personally or through any representative. It is clear that if these orders are not complied with, steps would be taken for imposition of penalties under Section 20 of the RTI Act.”

 

 

 

Source: PIO asks for application on prescribed form, reprimanded

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • shrivar1212
      By shrivar1212
      HI,
      I had filed a complaint with Dy. Registrar for gross violations in our society, even the redevelopment was carried out by blatantly ignoring Govt. Directives. In my letter I had exposed various deficiencies in the working of the society, and demanded inquiry under section 83 but no action was taken by Dy. Registrar. The complaint was filed on January 11, 2019. No Response till date.
      On 26th Feb, I escalated the matter to District Deputy Registrar, and filed the complaint who on March 7 issued an order directing Dy. Registrar of co-op societies to conduct an inquiry under section 83, but till date nothing has been done. I have copy of the order.
      I want to file an RTI in the office of District Deputy Registrar seeking information on the action taken on order issued by them to Dy. Registrar, I want to draft the application in most effective manner and probably in strong legal words.
       
      I want to seek following information:
      Status of the order dated ________ reference no _______ issued by them.
      The procedure/file noting/officer responsible to oversee the implementation of the order issued by District Dy. Registrar
      The procedure in District Dy. Registrar's office after issuing the order to Dy. Registrar to take action.
      If no such procedure is laid down to implement the said order, then guidelines/directions for implementation of the same.
      whether follow up is required from District Dy. Registrar's office after issuing the order, if YES, what is procedure for follow up? If NO reasons for lack of procedure
      Timeframe for Dy Registrar to take action on order
      Can you please help me draft the RTI on above points in clear and concise manner so that it won't be rejected on flimsy grounds.
       
    • momita
      By momita
      The latest directive assumes significance as some RTI activists have been killed in different parts of the country allegedly for seeking information related to some potential scams or irregularities in government departments.
      Transparency watchdog Central Information Commission (CIC) will now decide appeals and complaints even after the death of an appellant or complainant, the government has said.
      The Right to Information (RTI) Act allows information seekers to approach the CIC to lodge second appeal and complaint in case they are aggrieved with government departments over disposal of their application filed under the law.
      As per rules finalised in 2017, the proceedings pending before the CIC shall abate on the death of the appellant or complainant.
      The latest directive assumes significance as some RTI activists have been killed in different parts of the country allegedly for seeking information related to some potential scams or irregularities in government departments.
      Also, many RTI activists have opposed provisions of the 2017 rules, including the one that allows no action on appeals in case of the death of the appellant, saying they were aimed at diluting the Act.
      “Instances have occurred wherein appellant/complainant dies before their case is considered by the Commission,” said a statement issued today by the Personnel Ministry, the nodal department for RTI matters.

      View full entry

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy