Jump to content
avdhesh

RTI application seeks info regarding DGP Madhya Pradesh in his Son NRI Quota

Recommended Posts

avdhesh

New Delhi: On the basis of the information obtained under the RTI Act, a special court in Indore, directed state government to register a case of corruption, forgery and cheating against MP DGP.

 

The information provided three months ago, led to a complaint alleging that Ex. DGP had filed a false certificate in order to obtain admission for his son in 2001, under 'NRI-sponsored quota' in an engineering college of MP. It led to a series of events, forcing government to take action against the DGP.

 

June 9: On an RTI application filed by a journalist, the public information officer of Govindram Sakseria Institute of Technology and Schiece, registrar Mahipal Singh, said that a police officer's son, was given admission in 2001 under NRI-sponsored quota and, accordingly, he paid fees of $16,500 or its equivalent in rupees in five years.

 

June 16: Responding to Kheriwal's second application seeking further information, On the basis of the two RTI replies obtained by Kheriwal, Mahesh Garg, a former BJP corporator, filed a complaint before Indore special judge, Akhilesh Pandya, for criminal proceedings against DGP.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shrawan

On the follow up, the Indore bench of High court on Monday issued orders to quash the FIR registered by the Economic Offence Wing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
crusader

I heard that there was some fish play in not filling an FIR. Is that a fate of RTI exposed case!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Vinay

The issue was quite technical it was o decide if FIR under article 156 should be there or investigation should be there in article 202. Nothing changes really. Infact EOW coonfirmed everything gathered under RTI act. Corruption forgery even hawala as per the affidavid filed in High Court by EOW.

 

SO THE SUCCESS IS as bright as ever

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
abagmat

let me tell you that in this case it was ... a a bunch of very high ranking IPS officials involved.....

the court had given orders to lodge a 202 , which is a private complaint and not a 156(3) , which requires an FIR ....

the FIR was quashed in october 06, the complaint has already been dismissed on the 22jan 2007 by the honourable court.....

 

there are a number of current matters lying with the EOW under 156(3) for years and no action (FIR ) has been taken against them....!!!

there was never a case lodged in this matter after quashing of the FIR by the high court.....but the hype which was purpously created for ....everyone knows what

whatever happened to accountability .....

 

case has already been dismissed...!!!

there was no blood relation ship criteria for admission under NRI-sponsered quota and nor was there ant Hawala defined in june 2001 when the admission took place...!!!!

all money was paid thru bank drafts....and income tax paid for....all evidance has been presented to the court!!!

 

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shrawan

Clean chit to Swaraj Puri

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed the case pertaining to former Director General of Police(DGP)with Madhya Pradesh Government Swaraj Puri.He was facing a law suit for allegedly giving false information to get his son admitted in an Engineering college. However,Indore bench of MP High Court has dismissed the suit againt 1969 batch IPS officer Puri who retired as DG Home Guards on August 31,2007.The verdict was pronounced by Honorable Justice Shri. W.A.Shah.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Abhinav Bohare

I would like to add that there was some internal cold enmity, as some people in the circles opine was the cause of the entire episode ...Some officer also wanted to shadow the said officer....

 

This may be incorrect but , there were these true speculations around

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Debashis Basu

Dear Kushal

 

Read your comments

 

I can well imagine the fury of young officer from such false accusations who has been harassed because he or mone can choose his parents !!!!!! When we will learn to keep away our professional / personal rivalry away from our next generation !!!!!!

 

Regards

Debashis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest harshitp

I should add that if this could happen to IPS officer where do other stand. I am an aspirant of Civil Services and such facts discourage us.

 

Thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Vinay

Dr Kushal Pathak and others

 

Pls hold back until you read the judgement order, I have not yet read the same but what I heard was there a relative if defined as someone with one you are emotionally linked and therefore a NRI business man can be called the maternal grandfather and he can pay the fees on behalf of a senior IPs officer!!!!! This speaks very low of things around if we still feel it is a conspiracy, I believe it is corruption reeking from some other source

 

If people in lure of post retirement benefit can go to such abysmal levels we have no option but to carry out life with the expression of Sachin Tendulkar when he was declared out last evening against England in last match

 

But fortunately all of for us there is a Supreme Court whenrean appeal can be filed and is being filed

 

Let us separate corruption from rivalry, may be rivalry would lead to expose' on corruption that does not wipe out blatant corruption but exposing corruption is NOT a conspiracy

 

Aspiring IPS please be understan, Truth is exposed because of rivalry if you are honest everyone respects you and you need to fear nothing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
colnrkurup

As RTI Activists, the follow ups after obtaining the information should not bother us much though we stand deprived of the fruit of RTI by dismal follow-up.. The RTI has done its job and showed its power. Even known hard-core criminals engaged in anti-national activities are let off on various grounds by judiciary. We cannot help it. But RTI has succeded in expossing the true facts. Good enough ! Was this possible before 12 October 2005 ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shrawan

It is beyond the purview of this Portal to discuss about individual cases, sub-judice. The only purpose of the thread was to make aware about the RTI usage and it has already served the purpose.

 

Also this thread seems to name the person, and hence had been suitably edited and moderated and we apologize for the delay in noticing this.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Similar Content

    • Shree Vathsan
      By Shree Vathsan
      I had sought details of loan and copies of agreement entered with World Bank, JICA etc. of IT Expressway Chennai (created in partnership with Govt of TN) However the PIO has replied that they have moved out of world bank loan and taken loan from other banks details of which cannot be disclosed under 8(1) d of RTI Act citing "commercial confidence".
      However the IT Expressway is a public limited company having entered into agreement with Govt of TN and others for developing and maintaining a particular stretch of road.
       
      Kindly help me frame a good first appeal.
       
      Sent from my SM-J510FN using RTI INDIA mobile app
       
       
       
    • shrivar1212
      By shrivar1212
      Hello,
      I require help on co-operative issue. I had filed the RTI with the PIO, Dy registrar of co-op societies seeking information on affairs of society.
      The PIO has replied stating that the information I am seeking is available with co-operative society. My query is:
      1] Can PIO direct an applicant to private body for information?
      2] The society in question comes under the jurisdiction of the PIO, since PIO is public authority and co-operative society a private body, is it not duty of PIO to seek information from society and give it to me? How can PIO direct me back to society? This is RTI application, either I have to appeal or I have to forego. I cannot complaint against reply. So I want to approach FAA, under what grounds can I?
      3] What kind of violation PIO has committed by directing me back to private society? 
      4] Does co-operative society come under the purview of RTI ACt?
      Your views are appreciated. I am fighting lone battle with corrupt system. 
       

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy