Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
karira

Disclosure of IIT-JEE Key and Answer sheets allowed ?

Recommended Posts

karira

In a recent decision/order, CIC seems to have allowed the disclosure of IIT-JEE key and the answer sheets.

 

The order is not very clear.

 

It is attached to this post.

 

Members can read it and decide for themselves.

OK-15052008-20.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
colnrkurup

TheCIC in their full bench decision of 23-4-2007 dispossing complaint No.CIC/WB/2006/0023, Appeal Nos.CIC/WB/A/2006/00469 & 00395 and Appeal No.CIC/OK/A/2006/00266/00058/00066/00315 has given a very detailed order on the subject. The order has unnecessarily gone heyward. One has to red at lest thrice to grasp. Though many may not agree with me, I am fully satisfied with the contention of the CIC.

 

This order categorically state that " the disclosure of the answersheets shall be the general rule but each case may have to be examined individually to see as to whether disclosure of evaluated answer sheets would render the system unworkable in practice. If that be so, the disclosure of the evaluated answer sheets could be denied but not otherwise. However, while doing so the concerned authority should ensure that the name and identity of the examiner, supervisor or any other person associated with the process of examination is in no way disclosed so as to endanger the life or physical safety of such person"

 

The arguements till its para 38 establish that this does not fall under the exemptions given in 8(1)(e), viz., fiduciary relationship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
colnrkurup

I am surprised to note that hardly anyone gave attention to one of the good decisioins of CIC's referred to on this topic I recommend to all members of this forum to read the CIC's decision of 7 cases decided on 23-4-2007. This is available in CIC's site. It need at least 3 reading to grasp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
colnrkurup

Canvassing:

 

Please read this post. It is an important decision of cic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • Shrawan
      By Shrawan
      BANGALORE: In a landmark decision, the Karnataka Information Commission (KIC) has ruled that evaluated answer scripts should be made available to anybody who wishes to see them and cannot be kept confidential for the benefit of the examiners.
       
      The commission has ordered the Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC) to make available the answerscripts free of cost to applicant E Ramamurthy, who sought copies of four answer scripts of the Gazetted Probationers Examinations, 1998.
       
      State chief information commissioner K K Misra and state information officer K A Thippeswamy have rejected the KPSC's plea, which said that answer scripts cannot be made public as they are exempted under Sec 8 (i) (e) and 8 (i) (j) of the RTI Act, 2005.
       

      KIC observed.  
      More importantly, it has rejected the Central Information Commission's decision under Section 8 (i) (j) saying that seeking evaluated answer papers either his/her own or others is purely personal and has no relationship to any public interest or activity. "This view does not appear correct to this commission.
       
      Although the applicant is not to be asked the purpose for seeking information, in the present case, providing the information would ensure the impartiality, objectivity, and fairness of the evaluation by examiners appointed by public services commissions whose purpose incidentally is of utmost concern to the people," it stated.
       

      the KIC has held.
       
      [sourse: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/NEWS/India/Go_public_with_answer_scripts/articleshow/461240.cms]
    • ganpat1956
      By ganpat1956
      As the three-day Pan IIT-2006 meet concluded on Monday, nation-building still the overriding theme, alumni spelt out firm plans for campaigns touching on reforms in education and widening the ambit of the Right to Information facility.
       
      To scale up the Right To Information campaign, IITians will also lobby for including civilians in an auditing process on RTI. Impressed by a move to install a special phone line in Bihar that allows citizens to register RTI requests for Rs 11, IITians will also work towards scaling it up in other states.
       
      IITians unveil plan-Mumbai-Cities-NEWS-The Times of India

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy