Jump to content

Report Card on the Performance of Information Commissions in India

According to a “Report Card on the Performance of Information Commissions in India” prepared by Satark Nagrik Sangathan (SNS) and Centre for Equity Studies (CES), transparency is a key to promoting peoples’ trust in public institutions. The assessment found that several ICs were non-functional or were functioning at reduced capacity, despite large backlogs, as the posts of commissioners, including that of the chief information commissioner (CIC), were vacant during the period under review. In many cases, the appointments of information commissioners were found to be set aside by courts due to lack of transparency in the process of appointment and for being in violation of the provisions of the RTI Act and directions of the Supreme Court.
In addition, the Report, says, “By failing to disclose information on their functioning, ICs continue to evade real accountability to the people of the country whom they are supposed to serve. The legal requirement for the central and state information commissions to submit annual reports every year to Parliament and state legislatures respectively, is to make, among other things, their activities transparent and available for public scrutiny. However, very few ICs fulfil this obligation, and even fewer do it in time”. 
As part of the assessment, and in order to access information about the functioning of information commissions, both SNS and CES filed RTI applications with the 28 state information commissions (SIC) and the Central Information Commission (CIC). A total of 169 RTI applications were filed seeking identical information from all the 29 information commissions. The RTI applications were tracked to assess how each information commission performed as a public authority, in terms of maintaining and disclosing information. Three information commissions from Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu did not respond to, or even acknowledge, the RTI applications filed within stipulated time.
"Several ICs, like from Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh rejected requests for information invoking provisions seemingly in violation of the RTI Act. In all these cases, an appeal was filed against the denial of information. However, till the time of publication of this report, the requisite information had not been disclosed," the report says.
Apart from Tamil Nadu, three State Information Commissions (SICs), Odisha, Sikkim and Kerala returned the RTI applications citing procedural deficiencies.
Only 13 out of 29 ICs provided full information in response to the RTI applications filed as part of this assessment. Of the 107 chief information commissioners for whom data was obtained, the overwhelming majority (84%) were retired government servants including 67% retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers and another 17% from other services. Of the remainder, 10% had a background in law (5% former judges and 5% lawyers or judicial officers).

Resistance from banks in revealing Loan details to corporate entities

The RTI query, sent to the Ministry of Finance, sought details on individual exposure of various PSBs to corporate borrowers. The questions that were asked in the RTI query sought information on the loans given to the Reliance Industries, Adani Group, GVK Group, GMR and Jaypee Group. The RTI was first directed to the Finance Ministry, which then forwarded the RTI request to various banks asking them to provide the information. The RTI had questions on the money loaned to big industrial houses by government-run banks. However, all public sector banks except Andhra Bank and Allahabad Bank have refused to divulge information citing either the 'personal nature' of questions or how they don't fit under the provisions of the RTI Act. 
In their reply to the RTI query, the banks have said that the information available with banks under "fiduciary relationship" is exempted from disclosure.
Read about: Fiduciary Relationship under RTI
While Andhra Bank and Allahabad Bank have disclosed the loans given to big corporates, all other lenders refused to do so. Banks which did not disclose any detail in their reply to the RTI query include State Bank of India (SBI), Bank of Maharashtra, Corporation Bank, Indian Bank, Canara Bank, UCO Bank, Indian Overseas Bank, Central Bank of India, Bank of India and Syndicate Bank. Earlier this month, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley informed the Rajya Sabha that loans worth Rs 81,683 crore were written-off by public sector banks (PSBs) in 2016-17.
Country's largest public sector lender, the SBI, said, "The information sought by you under point number three to eight is the third party personal information held by the bank in a fiduciary capacity, the disclosure of which is not warranted for any larger public interest and as such is exempted from disclosure."

Upper limit of Rs 50 imposed on RTI Fee by Supreme Court

The Supreme Court fixed on Tuesday an upper limit of Rs 50 as application fee that government authorities can charge those seeking information under the right to information (RTI) act, the country’s transparency law.
Also, a bench of justices AK Goel and UU Lalit said public authorities cannot ask for more than Rs 5 for each page as photocopying charge, and an applicant need not mention the “motive” while filling out the application form.
The order came on petitions challenging high fees set by different public bodies, including high courts and state assemblies.
The decision can be downloaded from here:

43 years for RTI case finalisation in West Bengal- study

A biennial study conducted by Satark Nagrik Sangathan and Centre for Equity Studies has revealed a grim picture of RTI Act implementation with waiting time at information commissions running in years and commissions in several states becoming non-functional owing to unfilled vacancies. The study has found that if an RTI appeal were to be filed in West Bengal state information commission on November 1, 2017, it would be disposed of in 2060 – after 43 years. In Kerala, it would take six years six months and Odisha 5 years 3 months. The main reason for such a long waiting time is the reduced number of information commissioners that commissions are working with. 
The report has brought out, what it calls a “concerning trend”. The information commissions, which are the last resort for the common man to complain against wrongful denial of information, are increasingly returning cases. The highest number of cases have been returned by CIC, followed by Gujarat, Assam and Uttarakhand.

Govt clueless about death toll of Pandits in the Valley

Recommended Posts


Govt clueless about death toll of Pandits in the Valley


tnl-govt-clueless-about-death-toll-of-pa AS reported in Yahoo News! Sat, Jun 21 01:10 AM


The Centre may have the number of security personnel or militants killed in J and amp;K since the outbreak of violence in 1989, but it does not have any count of the Kashmiri Pandits who fell prey to insurgency. This admission, by the Centre, came in response to an RTI application filed by a Kashmiri Pandit, Aditya Raj Kaul, who wanted to know how many of his community members were killed in the state since 1989.


"J and amp;K Police has not shared information on the killings of Kashmiri Pandits with the Central Government," the Union Home Ministry had said in its reply. Jammu and Kashmir Director General of Police Kuldeep Khoda told HT that sharing of information with the Centre was a routine matter.


"We furnish whatever information is sought from us." The RTI came in the wake of a report, carried by a newspaper recently, and said to have been compiled by the J and amp;K Police for the first time since the outbreak of violence in the Valley.


It said militants had killed 209 Kashmiri Pandits since 1989. The report also said 31 militants were booked for killings in 24 out of 140 cases while killers in 115 cases remain unidentified or untraced.


"Since we contest the numbers of Kashmiri Pandits killed as cited by the report, we wanted to cross check it. The fact that all 31 militants charge-sheeted for killing Kashmiri Pandits were on bail was what prompted me to seek more information about it" Kaul said.


The Ministry said while 20,621 militants had been killed between January 1990 and April 2008 about 5147 security personnel laid down their lives while fighting terrorism. Kaul had filed another RTI with the Home Ministry, seeking details on the Wandhama massacre, in which militants killed 23 Kashmir Pandits on January 25, 1998.


However, the Centre again had no information about the incident. "We wanted to know what real progress had been made in this case and why wasn't it referred to a better agency had the local police failed to make any headway," said Kaul.


Govt clueless about death toll of Pandits in the Valley - Yahoo! India News

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • karira
      By karira
      A letter by Dr Muzaffar Bhat, Convenor, J & K Right to Information Movement, published in etalaat.net on 03 June 2008:
      The Daily Etalaat Srinagar - RTI: What?
      RTI: What?
      Conducting a survey on official handling of queries under the Right to Information act may sound simple.
      Having tried to do it, I can say it is a nightmare. One can be made to run around in circles for three or four days just to get a one-and-a-half page questionnaire filled.
      Could it possibly be that our public servants are afraid to commit themselves on what they have or have not done regarding citizens’ right to information?
      When I, along with two volunteers, went to the director of health services, Kashmir, a few days back, he carefully read the questionnaire and forwarded it to his PA. The PA forwarded it to the Section officer, and then told me to come to collect it the next day.
      When I returned next day, the section officer said he was busy and very coolly told me to come the next day. When I went, he made me wait for hours and still the questionnaire had not been filled. When we went to the Mayor of Srinagar Municipality, he handed the questionnaire to his Private Secretary – who in turn marked it to the Assistant Secretary. It took me two days to get the questionnaire from the Assistant secretary, and still it was incomplete.
      Then the Assistant secretary told me to contact the Joint Muncipal Commissioner. The peon did not allow us to go into his office chambers.
      We were told to meet his PA instead. His PA called the PA of the assistant secretary and told him to forward it to the Joint Commissioner in a proper way. So once again we returned empty-handed. Filling the questionnaire takes hardly five minutes but this doesn’t happen. This is Kashmir!
      This story doesn’t end here. The Deputy Director, Social Welfare said there is no RTI in J&K. I asked him if he had attended any training on RTI. He replied that he had, at IMPA (a government training agency). I told him that in spite of being trained on the RTI, why did he not know that J&K has an RTI Act 2004 in force.
      This conversation took place in the director’s chamber, and the director clarified it to his deputy that J&K state has its own Right to Information Act. The director, who was until recently the special secretary, power at civil secretariat, told us that he had replied to one RTI application while he was the designated officer in charge there under the J&K RTI Act. Still we had to wait for two days to get our questionnaire filled. All these hurdles won’t deflect us from achieving our goal. We will go ahead.
      "Iraadey jinn key pukhtaa ho, nazar jinn ke Khudaa par ho,
      talatum khaiz mojoun sey woh gabhrayaa nahee kartey".
      Those who have strong will power aren’t afraid of high tides.
    • karira
      By karira
      As reported by Neelesh Misra on hindustantimes.com on 18 August 2008:
      Lost in time- Hindustan Times
      Lost in time
      When Wajahat Habibullah once went to Kashmir as India's Chief Information Commissioner, he asked a top official for a copy of the state's best kept secret - J&K's own RTI-type information law that would enable citizens to find out what was hidden from then in the name of national security The official couldn't even find a copy of the law to give to Habibullah. It had, of course, never been implemented.
      Transparency has been in severe short supply for more than 20 years in Kashmir, now hurled back in a simmering cauldron that shows no signs of cooling. So here are the people who should be reading this book this summer: the Prime Minister, the Union Home Minister, the separatist leaders who are egging on Kashmiris to confront the Indian State, the fanatics in Jammu, and the security forces.
      Habibullah, who served long years in Kashmir as an administrator and negotiated the Hazratbal hostage crisis, has straddled and understands both the worlds of Srinagar and New Delhi. My Kashmir offers a sweeping chronicle of what went wrong in Kashmir - a candid look at everything from human rights violations and the Islamisation of a secular paradise to gaping holes in governance and policy misadventures - and what could fix it.
      Habibullah is a soft-spoken man, but is refreshingly straightforward for an Indian official. "If Kashmir is to be treated as an 'inte- gral part' of India," he writes, "India must adhere to its Constitution, and the Kashmiris should be allowed to enjoy the freedom that is guaranteed to them by that Constitution." Of the separatists, he writes: "True freedom in Jammu and Kashmir cannot be won by independence, which would bring even more suffering and would be unacceptable to both India and Pakistan."
      The author raises crucial issues related to governance and government conduct that often is glossed over in 'Kashmir discussion". He writes about, for instance, the tottering health system in the state and the massive unemployment.
      "Kashmir's forests have been among the principal casualties of violence," he writes. "People in the security forces set about felling trees to build their homes in villages across Punjab and Haryana." He also points out how the State Accountability Commission, creat- ed to check government corruption and uphold human rights, "quickly lost steam, possibly because it put political leaders and senior bureaucrats under increased public scrutiny".
      Habibullah's work - the result of a fellowship at the United States Institute of Peace ran into misplaced criticism when he pointed out that the US could play a crucial role as a facilitator in the Kashmir conflict. We can grudge it or welcome it, but it is widely believed that American pressure has been one of the key factors that helped ease the situation in Kashmir until this summer Howevel: the US State Department interestingly told Habibullah that the country "had played no role in the decrease in violence, and the Kashmir issue figured low on the US agenda in talks with Pakistan".
      Habibullah gives interesting details of his meetings with separatist leaders. In a 2003 meeting, Yasin Malik is quoted as saying that American pressure had indeed helped suspend ISI-backed infiltration - and hence put pressure on the Hurriyat Conference (from whom, the author does not say). He writes of a meeting with Mirwaiz Umar Farooq: "He reflected little apprehension of the ISI, a characteristic of previous conversations." The issue of KashmiriPandits is a punctuation mark in the larger story of J&K, but a very crucial punctuation that tells the story of how the fabled 'Kashmiriyat' was ripped.
      Habibullah raises the issue of the Pandits in detail, writing that the exodus of the community was "due to a calculated and cynical effort to convert a movement fuelled by public disaffection on civil issues into a religious insurrection". The authol: who was posted in Anantnag, the hotbed of insurgency, in 1990, describes the day when hundreds of people, led by the brother of separatist leader Shabir Shah, accused the administration of encouraging Pandits to leave so that the army could freely target the remaining Muslim and Sikh citizens. Habibullah told them that it was hardly surprising that the Pandits were leaving, as prominent community leaders had been killed and mosques were being used to announce threats.
      Objective, grounded in facts and peppered with interesting anecdotes, My Kashmir will teach something to all shades of opinion. As also confirming what British historian Vincent H.
      Smith had stated in 1928 and stands true especially today: "Few regions in the world have had worse luck than Kashmir in the matter of government."


Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy