Jump to content
sidmis

Land rights din surrounds airport

Recommended Posts

Land rights din surrounds airport

AS REPORTED by SANTOSH K. KIRO , The Telegraph, June 22 , 2008

 

- Villagers invoke RTI to claim revenue dept records, seek compensation

 

Ranchi, June 21: At a time when the aviation industry is going through a rough patch, the capital’s airport is being drawn into a controversy over land ownership: around 150 villagers now claim their families weren’t adequately compensated for the land on which the Birsa Munda Airport was built way back in 1963.

 

Their claims are based on a set of documents they received from the state revenue department after applying for certain details under the Right to Information Act.

 

The documents — over 1,035 pages — provide acquisition details of 982.44 acres of the 1,568 acres on which the airport is situated. The bone of contention is over the remaining land for which the revenue department could not produce acquisition details, since it pertained to “pre-Independence days”.

 

The villagers, represented by the Visthapit Sangharsh Samiti, are now thinking of moving the High Court against the state government for not parting with all the information.

 

“The state government has failed to provide satisfactory and complete information about land acquisition for setting up the airport,” said Krishna Sahu, the samiti’s general secretary.

 

“It has also failed to give us details of compensation paid to land owners on whose land the airport came up,” said the leader of the samiti formed in 2006 to champion the “cause of the aggrieved families.”

 

The samiti invoked RTI in April 2007 seeking various details about the land — namely, when and from whom it was acquired by the government, how much compensation was paid and to whom. But the information, that too incomplete, reached it only recently.

According to the documents, the then Bihar government had “acquired” 982.44 acres for the airport in the four villages of Hundru, Hethu, Hinoo and Kalyanpur during 1962-63.

 

Ranchi district land acquisition officer Kamal Shankar Srivastava, who provided the information to the villagers, agreed the information was incomplete.

 

“We have been able to provide detailed papers for a part of the land acquired. Rest of the documents aren’t available as it relates to the British period,” he said.

 

The British, he said, was understood to have “requisitioned” the remaining 585.56 acres between 1941-43 and paid farmers “yearly compensation” for the crops, houses, wells and trees that stood on their land.

 

Apparently, during WW II, the British were keen on setting up a military camp/command in the area. And as per its understanding with the villagers, the land would be returned to them after the war.

However, after Independence, the Indian Army continued to occupy the land.

 

None of this is included in the set of documents handed over to the samiti, which was set up by villagers belonging to Hundru, Hinoo, Hethu, Garhatoli, Chotaghaghra, Pakatoli, and Kalyanpur villages.

 

“My land happens to be right in the middle of the airport and I continue to pay revenue. There are many in the village like me. We should be compensated adequately,” said Vijay Wargiya, son of Om Prakash Vijay Wargia, the original owner.

 

State land revenue minister Dulal Bhuiyan, who is aware of the brewing controversy, said he would consult Union ministers.

 

“I have gone through the papers related to the airport land. The land whose acquisition papers aren’t available, may have been requisitioned by the British,” he said, adding he would constitute a representative committee and consult defence minister A.K. Antony and civil aviation minister Praful Patel to find a way to compensate villagers.

 

The Telegraph - Calcutta (Kolkata) | Frontpage | Land rights din surrounds airport

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Files

  • Blog Entries

  • Similar Content

    • By karira
      Recently I booked tickets on Air Deccan and Indigo for my mother.
      The tickets were booked on yatra.com and paid for by Credit Card.
       
      The cost of the ticket was shown as "Passenger Fare" and "Taxes". The taxes are approximately Rs. 1725.00 for each ticket.
       
      From experience, I know that these "Taxes" include Passenger Service Fee, Airport Tax, User Charges, Fuel Surcharge, Additional Fuel Surcharge, Security Charges, etc...."
       
      Due to health reasons, my mother could not make the trip.
      While cancelling the tickets, BOTH the airlines deducted the "passenger fare" part of the cost (which is correct, since the tickets were clearly non-refundable). However, BOTH the airlines told me that for the "taxes" part, they will only issue a voucher that can be used by the same passenger within 180 days and on the same airline.
       
      My thinking is that all these so called "taxes" become payable when a passenger actually travels. These "taxes" are collected by the airline, on behalf of the Government and to be paid to the Government when the passenger actually flies. They cannot collect taxes, not pay to the Government and moreover not refund to the passenger, but ask him to utilize this amount through a voucher which is non-transferable.
       
      Some research showed me that both Air Deccan and Indigo owe the Government huge amounts in taxes which they have not paid and also owe large amounts to the Airports Authority of India (AAI) for parking fees, navigation fees etc, which also they have not paid and are long overdue.
       
      I would like to know the following information through a RTI :
       
      1. When do these "taxes" actually become due ?
      That means , when are the airlines actually supposed to pay to the Government or the appropriate authority ? Are they supposed to pay the Government within a stipulated time period of collecting the amount OR only after a passenger flies ?
      2. Can someone collect taxes on behalf of the Government , not pay the Government and then also not pay back the passenger ?
      3. What are the relevant rules under which, someone who collects money on behalf of the Government and misuses the funds, can be penalised ?
      4. How much do these airlines (and others too) owe the Govt. on "taxes" and AAI on other charges ?
      Since how long are these payments overdue ?
      What action has the Govt. or AAI taken against these airlines ?
      If no action, why not ?
      When will action be taken ?
       
      Whom should I address my RTI application to ?
       
      Ministry Of Finance, Ministry of Civil Aviation, DGCA or AAI ?
       
      Can members please guide me.
       
      I was told that these procedures are in place by most airlines since mid October. Members and guests should bear this aspect in mind before booking tickets and check with the airline before paying for a ticket.
    • By vasu_m_r
      How does one go about finding the breakup of the taxes on our tickets ? I read somewhere that airlines charge it as tax and pocket the money. I would like to know how to find out more about it !
    • By sidmis
      New airport not open to public scrutiny: official
      As Reported By : Swathi Shivanand in The Hindu
       
      ‘Provisions of RTI Act not applicable’
      ------------------------------------------------------------------
      State promoters have 26 per cent stake in BIAL
      ‘It does not amount to substantially financing BIAL’
      ------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      BANGALORE: Soon thousands of people will start using the Bangalore International Airport at Devanahalli. Vast expanses of farmland have been acquired by the State Government to develop the greenfield airport. The State promoters have 26 per cent stake in Bangalore International Airport Limited (BIAL), the company developing the airport.
       
      Yet, the ordinary citizen cannot ask for information about the airport from its promoters apparently because the BIAL is “a company in the private sector,” is not a “public authority” and “provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005 and Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements 1999” are not applicable.
       
      This is the reply that Benson Isaac, an individual who asked for information under the RTI was told by A.R. Rajaram, head, legal, and company secretary of the BIAL. Under the RTI Act, any public authority has to suo motu declare basic information about itself.
       
      In a letter to the BIAL, Mr. Isaac argued that a public authority, as defined by the RTI Act, is any body or institution that is controlled or substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate government. The 26 per cent stake by State promoters in the BIAL, Mr. Isaac contends, is enough to consider the BIAL a public authority and all rules and regulations of the RTI act are applicable to it.
      Airport site
       
      “The Karnataka State Industrial Investment and Development Corporation has provided the airport site to BIAL free from all encumbrances under the Land Lease Agreement. Also a State support agreement of Rs. 350 crore would be made available by the Government of Karnataka to BIAL for the purpose of this project,” Mr. Isaac said, quoting from the BIAL website.
       
      Mr. Isaac also pointed out that in a similar case against the Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL), filed by Lt. Col (Retd) Anil Hebble, the Central Information Commission had ruled that the DIAL with 26 per cent stake of the State promoters, was a public authority. The same holds good for the BIAL too, he said.
       
      Acknowledging his letter, the BIAL, in its reply on April 20, 2007, maintained that it was not a public authority and “the question of furnishing any declaration/information suo motu or otherwise does not arise and we sincerely request you to treat the matter as closed.”
       
      Mr. Isaac has approached the State Information Commission. The BIAL, in its statement of objections before the commission, has disputed Mr. Isaac’s claim. It said that the 26 per cent stake of State promoters does not amount to “substantially financing BIAL;” that the relationship between the parties is that of “a creditor and debtor;” the land has been leased out to BIAL and the company does not own these lands and that the BIAL is required to pay concession fee and is also liable to pay taxes.
       
      On the question of similarities with the case against DIAL, the Bangalore airport promoters say that “the facts to be looked into and appreciated, is totally different from the case of Lt. Col (Retd) Anil Hebble.”
       
      The Hindu : Karnataka / Bangalore News : New airport not open to public scrutiny: official
    • By sidmis
      New airport not open to public scrutiny: official
      As Reported By : Swathi Shivanand in The Hindu
       
      ‘Provisions of RTI Act not applicable’
      ------------------------------------------------------------------
      State promoters have 26 per cent stake in BIAL
      ‘It does not amount to substantially financing BIAL’
      ------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      BANGALORE: Soon thousands of people will start using the Bangalore International Airport at Devanahalli. Vast expanses of farmland have been acquired by the State Government to develop the greenfield airport. The State promoters have 26 per cent stake in Bangalore International Airport Limited (BIAL), the company developing the airport.
       
      Yet, the ordinary citizen cannot ask for information about the airport from its promoters apparently because the BIAL is “a company in the private sector,” is not a “public authority” and “provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005 and Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements 1999” are not applicable.
       
      This is the reply that Benson Isaac, an individual who asked for information under the RTI was told by A.R. Rajaram, head, legal, and company secretary of the BIAL. Under the RTI Act, any public authority has to suo motu declare basic information about itself.
       
      In a letter to the BIAL, Mr. Isaac argued that a public authority, as defined by the RTI Act, is any body or institution that is controlled or substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate government. The 26 per cent stake by State promoters in the BIAL, Mr. Isaac contends, is enough to consider the BIAL a public authority and all rules and regulations of the RTI act are applicable to it.
      Airport site
       
      “The Karnataka State Industrial Investment and Development Corporation has provided the airport site to BIAL free from all encumbrances under the Land Lease Agreement. Also a State support agreement of Rs. 350 crore would be made available by the Government of Karnataka to BIAL for the purpose of this project,” Mr. Isaac said, quoting from the BIAL website.
       
      Mr. Isaac also pointed out that in a similar case against the Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL), filed by Lt. Col (Retd) Anil Hebble, the Central Information Commission had ruled that the DIAL with 26 per cent stake of the State promoters, was a public authority. The same holds good for the BIAL too, he said.
       
      Acknowledging his letter, the BIAL, in its reply on April 20, 2007, maintained that it was not a public authority and “the question of furnishing any declaration/information suo motu or otherwise does not arise and we sincerely request you to treat the matter as closed.”
       
      Mr. Isaac has approached the State Information Commission. The BIAL, in its statement of objections before the commission, has disputed Mr. Isaac’s claim. It said that the 26 per cent stake of State promoters does not amount to “substantially financing BIAL;” that the relationship between the parties is that of “a creditor and debtor;” the land has been leased out to BIAL and the company does not own these lands and that the BIAL is required to pay concession fee and is also liable to pay taxes.
       
      On the question of similarities with the case against DIAL, the Bangalore airport promoters say that “the facts to be looked into and appreciated, is totally different from the case of Lt. Col (Retd) Anil Hebble.”
       
      The Hindu : Karnataka / Bangalore News : New airport not open to public scrutiny: official
    • By sidmis
      MIAL(Mumbai
      International Airport Ltd) is a part of 'state', says HC
      Reported by Anshika Misra June 06, 2008 in DNA
       
      MUMBAI: In a landmark judgment with far-reaching consequences for
      private entities, the Bombay high court has held that Mumbai
      International Airport Ltd (MIAL), though registered as a private
      company, performs a public function and is a "state" as defined by the
      Constitution.
       
      The ruling on Thursday came in a case relating to a contract for the
      new duty-free shopping arcade at the international airport.
      The HC set aside the Rs571-crore retail contract handed by MIAL to
      Hong Kong-based DFS Group to design and manage the arcade.
       
      "Even though it (MIAL) is registered under the Companies Act, its
      functions in operating, managing and developing the Mumbai
      international airport cannot be characterised as 'purely private',"
      Justice DK Deshmukh and Justice ND Deshpande held.
       
      The HC has given the MIAL eight weeks to complete the procedure of
      inviting fresh tenders for awarding the contract.
      The order was passed in a petition filed by Dubai-based Flemingo Duty
      Free, which challenged MIAL's action to deny it participation in the
      tender process.
       
      With the court holding MIAL to be a "state", actions by MIAL can now
      be challenged in court, it comes under the purview of the Right to
      Information (RTI) Act, and it will be subject to the courts' writ
      jurisdiction. (Writs are judicial orders issued to a state or
      government body.)
       
      MIAL, a consortium led by GVK, is supported by the government in
      operating, managing and developing the Chhatrapati Shivaji
      International Airport (CSIA). Airports Authority of India (AAI) has
      leased out the international airport to MIAL for 30 years. The court
      held that MIAL performs statutory functions and exercises statutory
      powers under the AAI Act, 1994. "It (MIAL) is not a simple lessee of
      property," the judgment stated.
       
      MIAL had issued a public announcement in October 2006 inviting
      expressions of interest (EOI) for the duty-free retail contract.
      Located in the international terminal 2C at CSIA, the duty-free
      shopping area will be spread across 24,541 square feet.
       
      MIAL got nine EOIs including one from Flemingo, which was invited to
      make a presentation in November 2006. Eventually, Flamingo was not
      shortlisted. Flemingo challenged MIAL's action in court.
       
      The HC held MIAL's action to be "arbitrary". "Total absence of any
      reasons in any formal document or evaluation, admitted
      non-communication of any reasons to the petitioner (Flemingo) and
      contradictory untenable stands taken in different affidavits by MIAL
      clearly shows that it has acted in an arbitrary manner in
      short-listing entities," the court held.
       
      DNA - Mumbai - MIAL is a part of ‘state’, says HC - Daily News & Analysis
    • Total Topics
      119,587
    • Total Posts
      425,888
    • Total Members
      486,363
    • Most Online
      12,211
      02/21/2018 03:26 AM

    Newest Member
    শাহ্‌ মোঃ বোরহান
    Joined 04/21/2018 09:41 PM

Our Moderators

karira karira Super Moderator
ganpat1956 ganpat1956 Super Moderator
RAVEENA_O RAVEENA_O Super Moderator
ambrish.p ambrish.p Moderators
Sunil Ahya Sunil Ahya Moderators
jps50 jps50 Moderators

About Us

RTI INDIA established in the year 2006, attracts a broad audience of citizens, experts, professionals and Government Officers interested in the latest development in the field of Right to Information. We also boast an active community focused on helping citizens to File RTI, First Appeal and Second Appeals. Our download section contains many sample RTI forms for everybody to use.

Social Links

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy