Jump to content
Atul Patankar

Dalit RTI petitioner faces BSP politico's wrath

Recommended Posts

Atul Patankar

As reported at dnaindia.com on August 16, 2010


Uttar Pradesh may be ruled by a Dalit chief minister but poor Dalits in the state's rural areas continue to suffer under the oppression of upper caste politicians. One such case is that of a 50-year old dalit,Budhai Ram of Sidhauli village in Sitapur district, 80 kilometres from Lucknow.


Budhai Ram apparently made the mistake of filing a Right to Information petition at the office of the Sitapur district magistrate seeking details of sub-standard building material in the construction of government buildings in his village by contractors.


He received no reply to his petition. What he did receive, he alleges, were threats from the chairman of the Sidhauli nagar panchayat, an upper-caste politician considered close to a top-leader of the ruling BSP. He says he was asked to stop his enquiries and keep his mouth shut.


The leader's henchmenoffered him a "settlement" but when he approached the state Lok Ayukta with a complaint of corruption, they attacked him and his wife.


"On May 15 this year, body of my five-year old daughter was found in the pool of my village. I was threatened that I will also meet the fate of my daughter but Police did not provide any protection to us. On August 8, about 15 armed goons beat me and my wife mercilessly at my home. I escaped and called the police station, the circle officer and the ASP but to no avail," Budhai told PTI.


When contacted, Sitapur superintendent of police, Jyoti Narayan termed it a dispute between neighbours and denied that there had been any attack on the family of Budhai.


"We have investigated his case at least thrice. On all these occasions the complaints were found to be without any basis," he said. Narayan said a new officer has been asked to re-investigate.


RTI activists have been the target of violence in several cases and nine of them have been killed in different parts of the country this year forcing the Centre to consider offering protection to them under the whistleblowers category.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • maneesh
      By maneesh
      The recent report of the CSE regarding the use of high levels of pesticides in soft drinks has now prompted a group of well-known names from various fields to go the RTI route.
      On Friday, several activists including Prof Yashpal (former chairman UGC), Aruna Roy (RTI activist), Arundhati Roy, Shanti Bhushan, Arvind Kejriwal and Sandeep Pande (both Magsaysay winners) were present at the inauguration of the RTI kiosk in Jantar Mantar.
      Prof Yashpal and Aruna Roy proceeded to file requests for information under the RTI Act to several government agencies on the occasion.
      The questions addressed to the Central Ground Water Board, Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Food Processing, covered a gamut of issues, including how much water is being extracted by the soft drink bottling plants, whether the ministries had knowledge of sludge containing various chemicals in discharge of several soft drinks as well as if the government knew the amount of caffeine and aspartame being used in the colas.
      Activists file RTI on cola row- The Times of India
    • ganpat1956
      By ganpat1956
      A Chennai based consumer activist has been waging a battle for more than six months to get information from the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI), Nagpur, under the Right To Information Act.
      The petitioner, Dharmesh Shah of Besant Nagar, Chennai submitted his application to the NEERI, a Central Government Undertaking, on June 14, 2006, seeking information pertaining to the projects undertaken by the institute between 1998 and 2006.
      According to the petitioner, the NEERI failed to furnish the information much beyond the prescribed period of 30 days, following which he made an appeal to the Appellate Authority in the same organisation.
      Only later, the NEERI chose to reply, but that too, refusing to provide the information sought for.
      The institute also claimed that it had received the application only on September 1, while the application was actually submitted in June.
      In its reply, the NEERI said, "Any information pertaining to sponsored/consultancy projects is of confidential nature and is not to be disclosed from NE ERI's side." Aggrieved, the petitioner moved the Central Information Commission seeking to direct the NEERI to furnish the information he sought for under the RTI Act.
      "The NEERI denied me information quoting some rule of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). But neither the public information officer of the NEERI nor the CSIR could clarify or explain the rule to me. It is a grave violation of the RTI Act," Dharmesh Shah said in his appeal before the Central Information Commission. The appeal is to yet to be heard by the Commission.
      Source: The New Indian Express, Chennai Edition (Dec.19,2006)


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy