Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
karira

TN: Denial of RTI info amounts to deficiency in service: Forum

Recommended Posts

karira

As reported by Jeeva in timesofindia.indiatimes.com on 18 February 2011:

Denial of RTI info amounts to deficiency in service: Forum - The Times of India

 

Denial of RTI info amounts to deficiency in service: Forum

 

CHENNAI: Applicants can now approach consumer courts (apart from the state or central information commission) for compensation in case they are denied information by a public authority to applications under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

 

Delivering a landmark order to this effect recently on a complaint filed by R Rajakumar of Pudukottai, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in Thoothukudi asked a constituent college of Manonmaniam Sundaranar University to pay Rs 20,000 compensation to the complainant for failing to reply to his RTI application.

 

In October 2009, Rajakumar filed a petition with the university under the RTI Act seeking information pertaining to the copy of applications of women BSc computer science students received by St Mary's College, a constitutent of the university, in 2006-07. He affixed a court fee stamp of Rs 10 towards the application fee but didn't get a reply within the stipulated 30 days.

 

He then moved the district consumer forum saying he had paid the prescribed fee and hence he should be treated as a consumer. And the failure to reply to his queries would amount to deficiency in service, he argued and prayed for compensation under the Consumer Protection Act.

 

The university said the complainant could not be considered a consumer as the fee paid by him was fixed by the government for information under the RTI Act. The consumer forum did not have the jurisdiction to hear the complaint, it said adding that the complainant could only prefer an appeal with the appellate authority under the RTI Act.

 

The university also said it had forwarded Rajakumar's RTI application to St Mary's college but that the college said the information had already been furnished to the complainant in May 2009 and hence it wasn't necessary to give it again.'

 

Forum president M Ramachandran and members GP Bhadra Thulasi and S Leonard Vasanth said they had the jurisdiction to hear the complaint since it was a case of deficiency in service.

 

The National Consumer Disputes Redessal Commission had already made a ruling to this effect in SP Thirumala Rao Vs Municipal Commissioner, Mysore City Municipal Corporation case, they added.

 

Holding the college liable for deficiency in service, the forum said it had to provide the information even if the same had already been provided as the complainant had filed a fresh RTI application with the prescribed fee.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
karira
Guest pcbali

Please post link to download order of Consumer Forum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • jps50
      By jps50
      As per news items appearing in last week of June 2009, National Consumer Commission [NCDRC] has ruled that Consumer Protection Act is applicable to RTI applications also, if the applicant fails to get information sought. This was decided in S P Thirumala Rao, a consultant physician of Mysore vs. the Municipal Commissioner, Mysore City Municipal Corporation.
      Can some one put actual decision on this portal for the benefit of members?
    • jgambhir
      By jgambhir
      Hi
      My case in a Distt Consumer Redressal Forum New Delhi against a Phone and Internet service was dismissed despite the fact that it falls under Deficiency of Service. (My phone /Internet services withdrawn without any prior notice and even after paying the bill amount)
       
      I had provided the court with enough documentary evidence in support of my claim.
       
      The reason given in the Judgment for dismissal is irrelevant and baseless. I met the President and tried to explain him the case but he was not willing to listen anything and rudely told me to leave. (Jago garahak jao) .
       
      It seems that Mr. President was defending the service provider and did not even look to my documents.
       
      Can I file RTI to know the reason why my case was dismissed even after providing all documents? Why this is not a case of Deficiency in service?
       
      Can you guide me where to file RTI?
       
      and
       
      How to file appeal with State Consumer Commission?
       
       
      Thank you!

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy