Jump to content
  • 0
prashant.kumar

Help regarding RTI at PGIMER Chandigarh

Question

prashant.kumar

I had applied for some information at PGIMER Chandigarh on 21 June 2011. I had submitted the RTI application by hand in the format available from PGIMER RTI office and paid the RTI fee of Rs 10 and obtained cash reciept. The required information is detailed as follows.

 

1 In the recently conducted interviews for selection of faculty members at PGI Chandigarh, were there any structured objective criteria for selection.

 

2 How much weightage is given to post graduate education and patient care done by individual faculty members when deciding upon selection by the selection committee. Kindly provide documents proving this.

 

3 Have any faculty members including the Professors been selected at PGI Chandigarh without appearing for the interview physically. On how many occasions has this happened before. Was any faculty member at PGI Chandigarh selected at recently held interviews during December 2010 to April 2011 at PGI without haven appeared for the interview. Kindly provide documents proving the same.

 

4 What was the basis for such selection where the faculty member was not present for the interview. Kindly provide documents for this.

 

5 In the previously held interviews for selection to the post of faculty members, is there a provision for getting the selection process reviewed or reevaluated.

 

6 Has such selection process reevaluation or review happened after the declaration of results of such interview ever before. What were the basis and outcome of the review or reevaluation process if they were done. Kindly provide document proving this.

 

The RTI office assigned RTI number 3381 to this application.

 

I did not recieve any reply from CPIO PGIMER even after 30 days. I submitted first appeal to the FAA at PGIMER Chandigarh on 28 July 2011 stating the above facts. The CPIO replied with the following reply.

 

1 In the recently conducted interviews for selection of faculty members at PGI Chandigarh, were there any structured objective criteria for selection.

 

This information is not available with the recruitment cell.

 

2 How much weightage is given to post graduate education and patient care done by individual faculty members when deciding upon selection by the selection committee. Kindly provide documents proving this.

 

This information is not available with the recruitment cell.

 

3 Have any faculty members including the Professors been selected at PGI Chandigarh without appearing for the interview physically. On how many occasions has this happened before. Was any faculty member at PGI Chandigarh selected at recently held interviews during December 2010 to April 2011 at PGI without haven appeared for the interview. Kindly provide documents proving the same.

 

No

 

4 What was the basis for such selection where the faculty member was not present for the interview. Kindly provide documents for this.

 

This information is not available with the recruitment cell.

 

5 In the previously held interviews for selection to the post of faculty members, is there a provision for getting the selection process reviewed or reevaluated.

 

This information is not available with the recruitment cell.

 

6 Has such selection process reevaluation or review happened after the declaration of results of such interview ever before. What were the basis and outcome of the review or reevaluation process if they were done. Kindly provide document proving this.

 

This information is not available with the recruitment cell.

 

Obviously the CPIO is hiding all facts and does not want to provide information.

 

I request for help from the moderators and other members of this forum to kindly guide me as to what I can do further for getting the required information from PGIMER Chandigarh. I shall be highly obliged.

 

With regards,

 

Prashant Kumar

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
jps50

You should again file "second first appeal based on quality and quantity of information supplied" by CPIO. If information is not available CPIO should have sucked such information from any other location in PGIMER and supplied to you. Every CPIO is CPIO of entire organisation and not a particular cell. Please refer:

 

 

Transfer of application:

http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/blogs/jps50/1220-transfer-application-within-public-authority.html

 

FIRST APPEAL GUIDE [CENTRAL]

http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/blogs/jps50/18-first-appeal-central-govt-guidelines.html

 

 

FIRST APPEAL FORMAT [CENTRAL]:

http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/blogs/jps50/17-first-appeal-central-govt-format.html

 

 

 

If you are required to file second appeal please do include in prayer:

 

"If information is not available, CPIO should be ordered to supply me notarised affidavit to this extent"

 

You should avoid asking questions under RTI but seek information or record copies. Please also peruse:

 

 

Make effective:

http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/blogs/jps50/93-how-make-rti-application-effective.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • Shree Vathsan
      By Shree Vathsan
      I had sought details of loan and copies of agreement entered with World Bank, JICA etc. of IT Expressway Chennai (created in partnership with Govt of TN) However the PIO has replied that they have moved out of world bank loan and taken loan from other banks details of which cannot be disclosed under 8(1) d of RTI Act citing "commercial confidence".
      However the IT Expressway is a public limited company having entered into agreement with Govt of TN and others for developing and maintaining a particular stretch of road.
       
      Kindly help me frame a good first appeal.
       
      Sent from my SM-J510FN using RTI INDIA mobile app
       
       
       
    • shrivar1212
      By shrivar1212
      Hello,
      I require help on co-operative issue. I had filed the RTI with the PIO, Dy registrar of co-op societies seeking information on affairs of society.
      The PIO has replied stating that the information I am seeking is available with co-operative society. My query is:
      1] Can PIO direct an applicant to private body for information?
      2] The society in question comes under the jurisdiction of the PIO, since PIO is public authority and co-operative society a private body, is it not duty of PIO to seek information from society and give it to me? How can PIO direct me back to society? This is RTI application, either I have to appeal or I have to forego. I cannot complaint against reply. So I want to approach FAA, under what grounds can I?
      3] What kind of violation PIO has committed by directing me back to private society? 
      4] Does co-operative society come under the purview of RTI ACt?
      Your views are appreciated. I am fighting lone battle with corrupt system. 
       

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy