Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
dr.s.malhotra

Compiled List - Successful Consumer Complaints in RTI Cases

Recommended Posts

jps50

Great Efforts for compilation. Now members can quote may decisions.

 

Following links will be useful:

 

 

Additional Remedy

http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/blogs/jps50/719-additional-remedy-information-seekers.html

 

Consumer Notice

http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/blogs/jps50/1217-notice-under-consumer-protection-act-right-information-act.html

 

Consumer complaint draft and guide

http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/blogs/jps50/2114-consumer-complaint-rti.html

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
skmishra1970

Dear Malhotra Sahab Ji,

 

First many many congratulation to win a fight against your right. Secondly to nice post of the various judgements of DCDRF and NCDRC. Really it will be very usefull for the forum member. I feel shortage of words to give you thanks for this usefull post. Thank U so much.

 

SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

1224, SEC.19, PANCHKULA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
skmishra1970

Dear Mr. Malhotra,

 

Thank you for the usefull post of order dated 13-9-2011 of DCDRF Mohali. This will help me to plead my case effectively before DCDRF Chandigarh-I and as well as other member of this forum too. Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest pcbali

Thanks Dr. Malhotra and appreciations for your efforts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest pcbali

These are 9 files in total, are their more orders too? If their are, will you please provide the links for those to male a complete and up to date directory?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
skmishra1970

Congratulations Malhotra Sahab for your winning journey and greatfull efforts. Thanks again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jps50

I am attaching decision dated 30-11-2011 of Consumer Forum, Bangalore II additional ordering supply of information and compensation also.

DCDRF BANLOR II.doc

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bhandaridilip

Thanks for providing such valuable information.

 

I was not aware that an RTI applicant can be treated as a consumer under the CPA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dr.s.malhotra

With reference to post #10 :

it is a day of great satisfaction . An official from O/o Ld. Deputy Commissioner Ludhiana today visited me at Mohali and delivered the requested information [ albeit with a minor glitch] and a Demand Draft for Rs.1000/- .

 

I am closer to my target .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jps50

Salem [Tamilnadu] Dist Consumer Forum has ordered on 29-12-2011 supply of information and payment of compensation of Rs.5000/- to RTI applicant for non-supply of information. It is posted at

 

file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Administrator/Desktop/DCDRF%20SALEM%20291211-INFO%20AND%20COMPEN.htm

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
karira

Deleted. Posted by mistake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
skmishra1970
With reference to post #10 :

it is a day of great satisfaction . An official from O/o Ld. Deputy Commissioner Ludhiana today visited me at Mohali and delivered the requested information [ albeit with a minor glitch] and a Demand Draft for Rs.1000/- .

 

I am closer to my target .

 

Dr. Malhotra, Congrats. for your winning journey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bhandaridilip

Congratulations ! for your successful winning. With this win you have opened a new door for the RTI Act from which on can go to The Consumer Forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dr.s.malhotra

It is too early to form a final opinion .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dr.s.malhotra

the news on this Order was reported on forum by Sh. Ganpat and link to the file was provided to this Order / file by Dr. Prasanna ......thanks to them , both .

DCDRF DRIPURAMBANGALORE 30-11-2011.pdf

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jps50

Pune Dist Consumer Forum Main has ordered payment of compensation of Rs.15000 and expenses of Rs.1000 on 29-11-2011 in CC No. 564/2010 to Shri Haribhau Kakade. Order is in Marathi. In this case, SIC had ordered supply of information on 14-05-2010. Compensation was for mental agony due to deficiency of service by PIO.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
karira
Pune Dist Consumer Forum Main has ordered payment of compensation of Rs.15000 and expenses of Rs.1000 on 29-11-2011 in CC No. 564/2010 to Shri Haribhau Kakade. Order is in Marathi. In this case, SIC had ordered supply of information on 14-05-2010. Compensation was for mental agony due to deficiency of service by PIO.

 

Even if it is in Marathi, please upload a copy here so that all such orders are in one thread.

At least members will be able to refer to the numebrs/names, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
skmishra1970

Thank U JP Sir for your usefull post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bhandaridilip

Hon’ble District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forums as under have ordered supply of information and compensation to applicants of RTI Act 2005:

 

a. Decision dated 30.11.2011 of II Addl Bangalore in CC/1714/2011

b. Decision dated 19/05/2011 of Faridkot in CC/102/2011.

c. Decision dated 09/11/2011 of Ludhiana in CC/ 662/2011.

d. Decision dated 25/03/2011 of Tuticorin in CC/59/2010.

e. Decision dated 29/04/2011of Vizianagaram in CC/ 116/2010

f, Decision dated 08/09/2011 of Mohali in CC/249/2011

g. Decision dated 28.05.2009 of IInd Addl. Bangalore in CC/162/2009.

h.Decision dated 20/04/2010 of Mandi, H.P in CC/14/2009.

i. Decision dated 21/05/2009 of Mumbai South in SMF/MUM/301/2009.

j. Decision dated 24/05/2011 of Nizamabad in CC/41/2010

k. Decision dated 29/11/2011 of Pune in F/564/2010

l. Decision dated 07/01/2011 of Guntur in CC/204/2010

m. Decision dated 08/09/2011 of Mohali in CC/249/2011

n Decision dated 29/12/2011 of Salem in C.C. NO.54/2011

o. Decision dated 03/02/2011 of Tuticorin in CC/57/2010

p. Decision dated 24/08/2011 of Medak in CC/10/2011

q. Decision dated 02/12/2010 of Nagpur Addl in CC No. 140/ 2010

[order in Marathi]

r Decision dated 27/12/2010 of Vizianagaram in CC/ 118/2010

s. Decision dated 21/01/2011of Vizianagaram in CC/ 124/2010

t. Decision dated 11/05/2011of Naupada in CC/ 08/2011

v, Decision dated 07/04/2011of Coimbatore in CC/ 399/2010

–com Rs.5000 + cost Rs.1000 [order is in Tamil ]

 

All orders can be accessed at Computerization and Computer Networking of Consumer Forums in Country( Confonet)

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • jps50
      By jps50
      As per news items appearing in last week of June 2009, National Consumer Commission [NCDRC] has ruled that Consumer Protection Act is applicable to RTI applications also, if the applicant fails to get information sought. This was decided in S P Thirumala Rao, a consultant physician of Mysore vs. the Municipal Commissioner, Mysore City Municipal Corporation.
      Can some one put actual decision on this portal for the benefit of members?
    • jgambhir
      By jgambhir
      Hi
      My case in a Distt Consumer Redressal Forum New Delhi against a Phone and Internet service was dismissed despite the fact that it falls under Deficiency of Service. (My phone /Internet services withdrawn without any prior notice and even after paying the bill amount)
       
      I had provided the court with enough documentary evidence in support of my claim.
       
      The reason given in the Judgment for dismissal is irrelevant and baseless. I met the President and tried to explain him the case but he was not willing to listen anything and rudely told me to leave. (Jago garahak jao) .
       
      It seems that Mr. President was defending the service provider and did not even look to my documents.
       
      Can I file RTI to know the reason why my case was dismissed even after providing all documents? Why this is not a case of Deficiency in service?
       
      Can you guide me where to file RTI?
       
      and
       
      How to file appeal with State Consumer Commission?
       
       
      Thank you!

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy