Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
smbhappy

Rti effect - high court quashes puda's scheme for its employees

Recommended Posts

smbhappy

RTIFED NEWS

03 FEBRUARY 2012

 

Please find attached herewith a complete judgment in PIL case CWP-12628 of 2011 where in the Advocate H.C. Arora (President of the RTIFED) was petitioner. This Judgement was delivered by the the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court on 25 January and appeared in the section of the print media too, for your ready reference and benefit of the general public at large.

 

The petition was filed for quashing clauses (4), (7) and (9) of the office order dated 24.9.2010 (P-1) because the same prescribes for allotment of identified residential plots exclusively to the employees of Punjab Urban Development Authority-respondent Nos. 2 and 3 (for brevity, ‘PUDA’) at reserve price. Those employees of PUDA who have already owned residential plots/houses/flats either by purchasing in auction or from open market or by availing house loan facility from PUDA etc. are also eligible. The primary ground of challenge is that the impugned scheme is aimed at enrichment of employees of PUDA as also profiteering by the said categories of employees at the cost of taxpaying public, thus, opposed to public policy.

 

Brief facts of the case were that the petitioner, a public spirited person and the State President of RTI Activists Federation Punjab and also convener of ‘Action Group Against Corruption’ acted on a news report appeared in all the leading newspapers about the scheme floated by the PUDA for allotment of residential plots to its regular employees including those who already owned residential plots/houses or flats at reserve price. This prompted the petitioner to seek information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 from the Public Information Officer of PUDA. As per the information received by the petitioner under the RTI Act it transpired that the PUDA has framed a scheme for allotment of residential plots to the officers/officials of PUDA and its Directorate, vide office order dated 24.9.2010. Glaring information about those officers/employees who already own residential houses at various places like Ludhiana, Patiala, Jalandhar, Bathinda, Amritsar, Barnala, Panchkula, Mohali etc. but yet submitted applications for allotment of one more residential plot at SAS Nagar, Mohali. Petitioner also placed on record lists of those Class-I and Class-II officers who have submitted applications for allotment of 14 marla plots despite the fact that they own a residential house in their own name or in the name of their spouses. In nut shell, the petitioner has sought to raise an issue of public importance that whether the respondent PUDA, which is State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution being an instrumentality of the State of Punjab, could make allotment of plots to a selected class of employees out of the land acquired at the public expense for a public purpose.

 

While allowing the writ petion and thus quashing the PUDA's Scheme/office order dated 24.9.2010, the high court noted that "In support of our view we place reliance on the judgment rendered in the case of Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology v. State of Punjab, (1997) 2 SCC 65, Hon’ble the Supreme Court set aside the reservation to the extent of 2% of seats for wards of employees of the Thapar Institute and 5% seats for wards of employees of the Thapar Group of Industries and the same was regarded as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. In view of the above, the writ petition is allowed. The sheme or any other similar scheme is hereby quashed".

 

Click here to read/download the High court Judgement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
digal

Bhanot ji

Please find attached herewith a complete judgment

Site shows"Document cannot be Displayed. Pl. try again!!!"

 

However, your description about brief fact clarifies the matter. Well done ‘Action Group Against Corruption’ & RTI Activists Federation, Punjab!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
smbhappy

Site upgraded. Please visit now. And thanks for pointing out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy