Jump to content

NRIs demand access to information back home under RTI

Recommended Posts


As reported on thaindian.com on 04 November 2008:

NRIs demand access to information back home under RTI

NRIs demand access to information back home under RTI


New Delhi, Nov 4 (IANS) Non resident Indians in the US have demanded that they be allowed access to information related to public authorities back home under the Right to Information Act (RTI).


NRIs have appealed to the Central Information Commission (CIC) to direct Indian missions abroad to provide information related to public authorities back home under the act. The request from NRIs comes at a time when the country is taking stock of the problems in implementing the RTI Act in the last three years.


“The biggest problem we are facing is that the Indian embassy in the US accepts applications related to the embassy but returns RTI applications related to public authorities in India,” said Arun Gopalan, an RTI activist in the US and member of Association of India’s Development, at the CIC’s annual convention here.


“I have filed several RTI applications to public authorities in India through the Indian embassy in Washington in the last one year and am still awaiting a reply,” added Gopalan, a software programmer in Maryland.


The RTI Act, 2005, does not provide NRIs access to any information related to public authorities in India and they can only seek information related to Indian embassies in their respective countries. The CIC had issued an order in 2007 bringing the Indian embassies abroad under the purview of the RTI Act.


Vishal Kudchadkar, a software engineer from Los Angeles, who had filed an RTI application requesting information regarding the decision of the embassy not to forward RTI applications, said: “I hope the CIC will instruct the Indian embassy to forward RTI applications to other public authorities.”


According to NRIs, they are unable to participate in the transparency and accountability movement that promises to improve governance in India.


“The issue is debatable, as under the RTI Act embassies abroad are only authorised to provide information related to them,” a CIC official said.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Embassy of India, Washington DC infact has a very poor record of implementing the RTI Act. As per the Embassy website http://www.indianembassy.org/newsite/RTI.asp:


1. There is no Sec 4 suo-motu disclosure

2. The information is provided only to "Indian Citizens" and it requires the applicant to provide proof of citizenship.

3. There is a extensive note about Sec 6 (3) to pre-empt anyone from filing RTI applications pertaining to any other Public Authority.


I have filed 2 Complaints under Sec 18(1)(f) to the CIC against the Embassy of India, Washington DC and the High Commission of India, London for blatantly violating the RTI Act. The copies have been uploaded in the "Directory" section of the forum.


RTI Directory


Let us see what does the CIC try to do.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • nk agarwal
      By nk agarwal
      A RTI Application has been replied by an officer signing for PIO. To my understanding it is only the PIO who has to reply under his signature and name.
      My application and reply copy attached

    • avdhesh
      By avdhesh
      New Delhi: On the basis of the information obtained under the RTI Act, a special court in Indore, directed state government to register a case of corruption, forgery and cheating against MP DGP.
      The information provided three months ago, led to a complaint alleging that Ex. DGP had filed a false certificate in order to obtain admission for his son in 2001, under 'NRI-sponsored quota' in an engineering college of MP. It led to a series of events, forcing government to take action against the DGP.
      June 9: On an RTI application filed by a journalist, the public information officer of Govindram Sakseria Institute of Technology and Schiece, registrar Mahipal Singh, said that a police officer's son, was given admission in 2001 under NRI-sponsored quota and, accordingly, he paid fees of $16,500 or its equivalent in rupees in five years.
      June 16: Responding to Kheriwal's second application seeking further information, On the basis of the two RTI replies obtained by Kheriwal, Mahesh Garg, a former BJP corporator, filed a complaint before Indore special judge, Akhilesh Pandya, for criminal proceedings against DGP.


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy