Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
akhilesh yadav

Bihar: Information commission raps vigilance boss

Recommended Posts

akhilesh yadav

Information commission raps vigilance boss


Reported by Faizan Ahmad in timesofindia.indiatimes.com on Oct 21, 2012

Information commission raps vigilance boss - The Times of India


PATNA: State Information Commission (SIC) has taken serious exception to the plea of vigilance department's principal secretary A K Chouhan to reconsider its order of August 9, whereby the SIC had warned him of penal action under RTI Act for denying information to a petitioner.


Chouhan, in a memo sent to the SIC through his department's public information officer (PIO) on Monday last, reiterated his earlier stand that the information sought by the petitioner concerned was not maintained by his department and hence could not be provided. The matter pertains to the query of a former legislator and social activist, Umadhar Singh, who had sought to know how many corruption cases were filed and disposed of by the vigilance department during the tenure of the present principal secretary, Chouhan.


Information commissioner Farzand Ahmed, after hearing both the PIO and the petitioner, said in his order, "The review petition filed by the department chief didn't reflect any kind of accountability and transparency in its functioning. In this era of transparency and good governance, everyone is looking at the department with great hope. But the department itself doesn't know how many corruption-related cases are filed. The information sought by the petitioner is in public interest and not related to any individual."


In his earlier order, Ahmed had urged the principal secretary to form a small team of officials to work on the petition and provide the information to the petitioner.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not a court decision. Needs to be shifted to appropriate forum

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • karira
      By karira
      Officials in a fix over Samal report
      HYDERABAD: Officials in the State Vigilance Commission seem to have been caught in the proverbial Catch 22 situation over the controversial ‘Samal report.’
      Whether a copy of this ‘report’ can be obtained under the Right to Information (RTI) Act still remains a million-dollar question. After the 56-page report was released to media by former Vigilance Commissioner R.C. Samal soon after demitting office on September 7, the Vigilance Commission received two petitions under the Act, seeking copies of the ‘report’.
      Official version
      Confirming that a couple of petitioners have sought the copies of the report under the RTI Act, a senior Vigilance Commission official says: “As per the Act, we have to accept every petition and we have done so in these two cases also.”
      No report submitted
      While Chief Minister Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy has admitted that Mr. Samal has not submitted any annual report to the Government, sources say that the report that caused ripples was just a press statement and had no “official sanctity.”
      Interestingly, officials are indeed in a dilemma as to whether or not to classify the report as ‘official’.
      ‘A puzzle’
      A section of officials argue that it cannot be construed as an official report since Mr. Samal has not submitted it to the Government.
      The other argument is that even if it has not been submitted to the Government, the mere preparation of the report by the Vigilance Commissioner should be treated as an official document. That whether Mr. Samal had ‘leaked’ the complete report verbatim or parts of it remains a puzzle.
      Officials in the State Information Commission (SIC), however, feel that a copy of such a report can be given only if it is ‘official’. “We have not received any request so far from any individual,” they say.
      The Hindu : Andhra Pradesh / Hyderabad News : Officials in a fix over Samal report
    • sidmis
      By sidmis
      The Central Vigilance Commission does not want its files opened to public scrutiny under the Right to Information Act.
      The CVC, Directorate General of Income Tax, the Railway Protection Force and a slew of government agencies have sought exemption from the RTI act, India’s transparency law, the government disclosed today.
      Responding to a question in the Rajya Sabha today, minister of state for personnel and training Suresh Pachauri said 16 government bodies had written to the ministry, asking for exemption.
      The armed forces (the army, navy, air force and the coast guard) wanted immunity for security reasons, but their appeal was turned down.
      The office of secretary (security) at the cabinet secretariat and the Bureau of Civil Aviation (security) sought exemption on identical grounds, and were also turned down.
      The Special Protection Group, the Defence Research and Development Organisation, Border Road Development Board and the Financial Intelligence Unit are the only bodies that have been excluded from the act’s purview, Pachauri said.
      New Delhi, Nov. 22
      The Telegraph - Calcutta : Nation


  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy