Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
  • 0
drgvrao

Can i ask for 3rd party IT returns

Question

drgvrao

Can i ask for 3rd party IT returns of a person who has undisclosed investments in shares and debentures. He made certain disclosures in a court of law and that does not tally with his known sources of income. He serves in a GOI u/taking. Just let me know.

 

with regards

 

dr g v rao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Atul Patankar

Income tax department has consistently taken view that the information given to them is in fiduciary capacity, and personal in nature. As such, they always deny such information. I think that in case of film financer bharat shah, an exception was made, because there was some 'benami gangster' investment.

 

But if you are speaking about a government employee, he has to make a sworn ststement of assets, including assets held by family members, to their department every year. I think a copy of that statement can be demanded. Then you can match the same with his known sources of income

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
bahl_ajay

Dear Atul,

Declaring of Property Returns is applicable only to Group B and above Govt. officials. What if the Govt servant is of a lower level and still possessing property/assets more than his known sources of income.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • momita
      By momita
      Bengaluru resident T Narsimha Murthy had moved an application under the RTI Act on April 10, seeking information that who all came to meet Salman in the jail during his judicial custody from April 5 to 7 after his conviction by the trial court in the blackbuck poaching case.
      Instead of providing information to the applicant, the jail administration sought permission from Salman, asking him of his opinion! 
      Justifying the move, DIG (jails) Vikram Singh said since the information pertained to a third party, the jail administration required to have his permission before providing the same to the applicant. "Since the information sought by the applicant belonged to a third party , we have sought his (Salman's) permission", Singh said.
      Prima Facie, the information does not seem to be third party information and could have been given in larger public interest. What are your views?
       
    • momita
      By momita
      Instead of providing information to the applicant, the jail administration sought permission from Salman, asking him of his opinion. "Since the information sought by the applicant belonged to a third party , we have sought his (Salman's) permission"
      Bengaluru resident T Narsimha Murthy had moved an application under the RTI Act on April 10, seeking information that who all came to meet Salman in the jail during his judicial custody from April 5 to 7 after his conviction by the trial court in the blackbuck poaching case.
      Instead of providing information to the applicant, the jail administration sought permission from Salman, asking him of his opinion! 
      Justifying the move, DIG (jails) Vikram Singh said since the information pertained to a third party, the jail administration required to have his permission before providing the same to the applicant. "Since the information sought by the applicant belonged to a third party , we have sought his (Salman's) permission", Singh said.
      Prima Facie, the information does not seem to be third party information and could have been given in larger public interest. What are your views?
       

      View full entry

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy