Jump to content
News Ticker
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
  • Sign in to follow this  

    Guest Teacher gets 125% more of his remuneration by RTI as compensation for delay


    rtiindia

    Guest TeacherA senior citizen was made to wait for three years to get his due remuneration of working as Guest teacher in a school. When confronted by Central Information Commission, Dte of Education agreed that the Guest teacher was entitled for the remuneration.

     

    The Commission found this delay as a serious lapse on the part of the Public Authority, who indulged in unnecessary correspondence among various officers of the same Department, instead of making payment to a senior citizen like the RTI applicant of the age of 69 years, who has been made to wait for 3 years.  Not only CIC directed the Public authority to pay within a week but also ordered to pay 125% more than the remuneration apart from the remuneration and interest, within 3 weeks from the date of receipt of the order for the delay in information supplied. At our forums we have a lot of discussions on School & RTI and if you have any questions to ask regarding RTI please go ahead and post it here!

     

    In this case the CIC went further ahead and directed the PIO/APIO(NW)/Principal of the GBSS School and the DDE (Planning) North­West District to show cause why penalty cannot be imposed on them for the inordinate delay in furnishing the information about the payment of dues to the RTI applicant.

    Guest Teacher

    Mr. Attar Singh Kaushik aged 69 years submitted that he is seeking information through his RTI application dt. 3­9­2012 regarding the non­payment of his salary for the relevant period he worked as guest teacher. PIO replied on 14­9­2012 saying that the payment of appellant’s salary is the responsibility of the concerned Head of the School. Being unsatisfied with the reply of PIO, the appellant preferred First Appeal dt. 27­12­2012. As he could not receive any order from the FAA in the prescribed time, he approached the Commission with the 2nd appeal.

     

    Decision: (Verbatim as per CIC decision)

     

    Commission heard the submissions. "The appellant is entitled to remuneration as a guest teacher for the teaching and relating work for the period from 7­3­2011 to 31­3­2011. The Principal of the school calculated the amount as Rs.7,200/­ to be paid to the appellant. He has quoted sanctions from Planning section, etc. and presented papers for non­payment of the dues to the appellant. The Commission finds this delay as a serious lapse on the part of the Public Authority, who is indulging in unnecessary correspondence among various officers of the same Department, instead of making payment to a senior citizen like the appellant of the age of 69 years, who has been made to wait for 3 years. The respondents agree that the appellant is entitled to receive the payment. The Commission, therefore, directs the respondent authority to inform by what date the payment of Rs.7,200/­ will be released, within one week along with interest on the same, from the date it was due to be paid till the date on which it is being paid at a simple interest prevailing in the banks.

     

    The Commission also directs the respondent authority to pay the appellant a compensation of Rs.9,000/­ apart from the remuneration and interest, within 3 weeks from the date of receipt of the order for the delay in information supplied. The Commission also directs the PIO/APIO(NW)/Principal of the concerned School and the DDE(Planning) North­West District to show cause why penalty cannot be imposed on them for the inordinate delay in furnishing the information about the payment of dues to the appellant."

    The decision is available here at CIC website: Mr. Attar Singh Kaushik Vs. Dte. Of Education, Delhi 

    Sign in to follow this  


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy